Skip to main content

Nokia Bell Labs tests internet connection 1,000 times faster than Google Fiber

Google Fiber Portland
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Don’t get too excited, Nokia’s test was just that: a laboratory test. Conducted in conjunction with Deutsche Telekom T-Labs, and the Technical University of Munich, Nokia Bell Labs used a new transmission technique to achieve a transfer rate close to the theoretical “Shannon” limit.

These blazing fast speeds, which are around 1,000x faster than the fastest fiber optic internet connections in the U.S., were achieved by using a technique called Probabilistic Constellation Shaping, or PCS, according to ZDNet.

Recommended Videos

PCS can achieve this level of speed because it handles data transmission in a fundamentally different way. By essentially stacking signals inside the fiber optic cable, instead of transmitting them back-to-back, researchers at the aforementioned labs were able to very nearly scrape the surface of the theoretical limit of signal transmission via fiber optic cable.

The theoretical limit, the glass ceiling which Nokia Bell Labs managed to scuff with their 1Tbps test, was first discovered in 1948 by Claude Shannon, a pioneering engineer at Bell Labs.

That is, of course, a vast oversimplification of a very complicated process, but the end result is a massive increase in transmission speed. While you’re not going to see a 1Tbps internet connection any time soon, the fact that the Nokia’s Bell Labs were able to reach that speed in a laboratory setting, using a novel transmission method, will have far-reaching implications.

“Future optical networks not only need to support orders of magnitude higher capacity, but also the ability to dynamically adapt to channel conditions and traffic demand,” said Marcus Weldon of Nokia Bell Labs in a press release.

High-speed data connections are, of course, an area of great interest as online communications demand more and more from existing hardware. Advancements in the field aren’t uncommon, but the Nokia lab test completely surpasses what’s capable with current technology. If it becomes feasible for everyday use, it could lead to a huge leap in bandwidth.

Jayce Wagner
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A staff writer for the Computing section, Jayce covers a little bit of everything -- hardware, gaming, and occasionally VR.
How to know which Mac to buy — and when to buy it
The M4 Mac mini being used in a workplace.

If you’re in the market for a new Mac (or Apple display), there’s a lot of choice ahead of you. Maybe you're interested in a lightweight MacBook Air from the selection of the best MacBooks -- or maybe one of the desktop Macs. Either way, there’s a wide variety of Apple products on offer, including some external desktop monitors.

Below you'll find the latest information on each model, including if it's a good time to buy and when the next one up is coming.
MacBook Pro

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This fps-doubling app is now even better than DLSS 3
Cyberpunk 2077 on the Sony InZone M10S.

Lossless Scaling is a $7 Steam app that's flipped the idea of frame generation on its head this year. Similar to tools like Nvidia's DLSS 3 and AMD's FSR 3, Lossless Scaling offers frame generation. However, it works with any game, and with any graphics card, and it can triple or quadruple your frame rate with this frame generation. And now, the app is going further with a feature that even DLSS 3 and FSR 3 don't have.

The developer posted the 2.12 beta to Steam on Wednesday, and it adds a couple of new features. The big one is a resolution scale for LSFG, the tool's own machine learning-based frame generation algorithm. This allows you to decrease the resolution of the input frames, leading to a very minor quality loss in exchange for a fairly large performance boost. The resolution of the game doesn't change at all. You're basically giving the frame generation algorithm slightly less information to work with.

Read more