Skip to main content

T-Mobile’s parent company is developing an anti-drone defense system

deutsche telekom anti drone system flying with camera on the sky
Image used with permission by copyright holder
There’s no denying that drones — the remote-controlled quadcopters quickly nearing ubiquity — hold incredible value. They can coordinate a spectacular light show, deliver small packages across challenging terrain, and provide breathtaking aerial views of wonders both man-made and natural. But the pilots behind them aren’t infallible. Drones have impeded firefighting efforts, interfered with first responders, and triggered the lockdown of federal buildings. It’s those latter cases that T-Mobile’s parent company, Deutsche Telekom, is attempting to address with a new anti-drone security system.

The system, which Deutsche Telekom is actively developing ahead of a planned launch later this year, is intended to prevent nefarious (or just plain ignorant) drone pilots from flying within the boundaries of airports, government installations, stadiums, and other venues where congested air traffic might present a problem. Car manufacturers are interested, too, reportedly because of a recent rash of journalists who’ve employed remote-controlled quadcopters to capture images of pre-production cars.

Recommended Videos

According to Dutch publication Welt am Sonntag, Deutsche Telekom’s system is purely visual, which is to say that it doesn’t actually prevent drones from entering restricted airspace. Instead, it’s comprised of an amalgamation of sensors, including ultrasound audio detectors, frequency scanners, and cameras, that help detect unwanted remote-controlled aircraft up to half a mile away.

The company completed a successful demonstration of the technology this past summer, in July, for which it invited a number of drone defense firms including U.S.-based Dedrone, Norway’s Squardhead Technology, Airbus’s Rohde & Schwarz, and Australia’s Droneshield.

In some ways, Deutsche Telekom’s solution falls short of the anti-drone efforts that have come before it. The SkyWall 100, a shoulder-mounted net launcher pioneered by a group of English engineers, uses a smart scope to automatically calculate the targeted drone’s distance and vector. Batelle’s DroneDefender rifle, meanwhile, knocks drones offline by emitting a series of high-intensity electromagnetic waves in rapid succession. And the U.S. Army’s new anti-UAV defense system, an an-drone weapon devised by engineers at Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey, first 10-round burst of bullets from two 50mm Bushmaster cannons mounted atop a tactical vehicle.

But it’s well-suited for use in countries where incapacitating a trespassing drone remains a legally grey practice. Germany, for instance, forbids remotely deactivating a trespassing drone, but doesn’t forbid forcing it to return to its launch site by jamming its signal. Shooting down drones in the United States, meanwhile, remains illegal, and furthermore punishable by up to 20 years in prison, according to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration ruling.

Some drone makers, including DJI, have implemented geofencing systems that prevent operators from flying and landing in locations designated as “off limits.” But those systems are platform dependent; platforms like Deutsche Telekom’s are effective against drones of all models.

At least one party has already expressed interest in deploying Deutsche Telekom’s system: soccer club FC Bayern. Reuters reports that the sporting outfit has been “looking for a system to fend off drones during soccer matches,” and that it previously talked to defense group Rheinmetall about the firm’s electromagnetic technologies.

Presumably, it’d be preferable to the Dutch police’s method of disabling errant drones: trained eagles.

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more