Skip to main content

Uber will shell out $20M to settle claims it misled drivers over wages

uber lawsuit underpay drivers 3 million driver stepping out
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Uber has agreed to pay $20 million over claims made by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that it recruited drivers with false information about how much they could earn in the job.

The FTC alleged that Uber claimed on its website that the annual median income of Uber drivers in New York City exceeded $90,000, but the consumer protection agency insisted the figure was instead $61,000. In another city, this time San Francisco, Uber put earnings at more than $74,000, while the FTC claimed a more accurate figure was $53,000.

Recommended Videos

In reality, less than 10 percent of drivers in the two cities earned the kind of money that Uber claimed, the FTC said.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The agency also alleged that the ride-hailing giant exaggerated the potential hourly rate in job listings in a bid to lure new drivers.

But that wasn’t all that the FTC had to say about Uber’s business practices, claiming it also gave erroneous information to drivers regarding the financing or leasing of cars.

For example, Uber told drivers they could “own a car for as little as $20/day” ($140/week) or lease a car with “payments as low as $17 per day” ($119/week), and “starting at $119/week.”  But the FTC alleged that from at least late 2013 through April 2015, the figures were more likely to be around $160 and $200, respectively.

Uber also claimed its drivers could receive leases with unlimited mileage through its program, but in reality the leases came with mileage limits, the FTC alleged.

Uber has at no time admitted to, or denied, the FTC’s allegations, but has promised not to misrepresent the potential income figures for drivers, and to ensure its terms and conditions for leasing vehicles are accurate.

“Many consumers sign up to drive for Uber, but they shouldn’t be taken for a ride about their earnings potential or the cost of financing a car through Uber,” Jessica Rich, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a release. “This settlement will put millions of dollars back in Uber drivers’ pockets.”

Indeed, the $20 million will be used to provide refunds to affected drivers across the U.S., the FTC confirmed.

Responding to Wednesday’s developments, Uber said in a statement that it was “pleased to have reached an agreement with the FTC,” adding, “We’ve made many improvements to the driver experience over the last year and will continue to focus on ensuring that Uber is the best option for anyone looking to earn money on their own schedule.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Location data for 800,000 cars exposed online for months
VW logo.

A data leak led to around 800,000 Volkswagen (VW) electric vehicles (EVs) having their location exposed online for several months, according to a report by German news magazine Der Spiegel.

The global incident impacted owners of EVs from VW, Audi, Seat, and Skoda, with real-time location showing for the affected vehicles, whether they were at home, driving along the street, or, in the words of Der Spiegel, parked “in front of the brothel.”

Read more
Faraday Future could unveil lowest-priced EV yet at CES 2025
Faraday Future FF 91

Given existing tariffs and what’s in store from the Trump administration, you’d be forgiven for thinking the global race toward lower electric vehicle (EV) prices will not reach U.S. shores in 2025.

After all, Chinese manufacturers, who sell the least expensive EVs globally, have shelved plans to enter the U.S. market after 100% tariffs were imposed on China-made EVs in September.

Read more
Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs. Tesla Model Y: Does electric SUV beat the bestselling EV?
Hyundai Ioniq 9 driving

The long-awaited Hyundai Ioniq 9 is finally on the way, after months of waiting for what many hope will be a  true competitor to the Kia EV9. The electric SUV is likely to be one of the go-to options for those who want a larger EV at a lower price than the likes of the Rivian R1S. But, while it's larger than the Tesla Model Y, it's also likely to be a little more expensive.

The two vehicles are a bit different when it comes to things like performance, range, and charging. Is the Hyundai Ioniq 9 worth the extra cash, or should you go for the cheaper, yet smaller car? We put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The overall designs of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Tesla Model Y are pretty different, and that may be enough to sway your buying decision. The Ioniq 9 is a true SUV; it's big and boxy, and while it looks a little sleeker than some SUVs thanks to its curved roofline, it's clearly larger than the Tesla Model Y. At the front of the Ioniq 9 is a long light bar separated into pixel-like blocks that helps give the vehicle a unique design motif. At the rear of the Ioniq 9, you'll also find pixel lights curving around the sides and top of the trunk. The Ioniq 9 measures 199.2 inches long, 78 inches wide, and 70.5 inches high.

Read more