Skip to main content

Designer Roland Sands evokes ’70s California with Ducati Scrambler Mach 2.0

When artists work with motorcycles the results are often impressive, and that is particularly true in the case of Ducati’s recently announced Scrambler Mach 2.0, created in collaboration with California designer Roland Sands.

Sands is an avid motorcyclist and high-level amateur flat track racer. His firm, Roland Sands Design, has worked with several other motorcycle companies on special editions in the past. Sands continues to help boost Hooligan and Super Hooligan Racing, the amateur version of American Flat Track professional racing, with specially modified Indian FTR750s. The designer has worked with custom Harley-Davidsons, with the BMW’s Concept 101, and teamed previously with Ducati with a XDiavel.

Recommended Videos

The Roland Sands Design edition Ducati Scrambler Mach 2.0 is not Ducati’s first experience with scrambler art. Earlier this year Ducati paired with tattoo artist Grime on another scrambler bike, the one-off Ducati Grime Scambler Maverick.

The Mach 2.0 design was inspired by a Bell Cross Idol helmet from Ducati’s Scrambler 2017 apparel collection, more of Sands’ work. The colors of the helmet and the Mach 2.0 were chosen by Sands to evoke the world and ambiance of the U.S. West Coast in the 1970s.

The Ducati Scrambler Mach 2.0 carries on the name of the Ducati Scrambler Mach 1 250 from the 1960s. In keeping with scrambler tradition and with Sands’ own riding interests, the Mach 2.0 has a low variable cross-section aluminum handlebar, a Flat Track Pro seat, black exhaust cover, and café racer brushed fins.

Power for the Mach 2.0 is provided by an L-twin Desmodromic air-cooled 803cc engine that produces 73 horsepower at 8,250 rpm and 49 pound-feet of torque at 5,750 rpm. The bike has electronic throttle ignition, a two-into-one exhaust system with a stainless steel muffler, and an aluminum silencer cover. A six-speed transmission moves through the gears.

A tubular steel Trellis frame with upside down Kayaba forks in-front and an adjustable Kayaba rear shock comprise the chassis. The bike rides on an 18-inch front wheel and 17-inch rear wheel.

With a 56.9-inch wheelbase and 31.1-inch seat height, the Mach 2.0 weighs 410 pounds wet, meaning topped off with fluids and with a full 3.7-gallon fuel tank. The starting price for the Ducati Scrambler Mach 2.0 is $10,595.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more