Skip to main content

8 times that movie and TV sci-fi got the future right

You only have to note the fact that we’re not all wearing glittery jumpsuits and driving flying cars everywhere to realize that the future painted by science fiction isn’t always in line with what the real world has to offer. (We’re guessing that’s down to the pesky “fiction” part.)

Nevertheless, it only takes a cursory look at some of the genre’s most notable movies and TV shows to see that sometimes sci-fi can get it very right indeed. Without further ado, then, here are our picks for eight predictions that turned out to be right on the money.

Recommended Videos

Back to the Future Part II (1989)

Back to the Future Part 2 (5/12) Movie CLIP - The Future McFlys (1989) HD

Considering that it’s not remotely close to being hard, serious sci-fi, Back to the Future Part II sure did get a lot right. We’ll ignore the near-continuous efforts to make real-life self-lacing shoes and hoverboards for a second, because those are obviously inspired by the movie rather than predictions that happened to come true, but there’s still plenty to choose from.

The above scene depicts the McFly family using VR headsets that could easily be Oculus Rift or Microsoft Hololens to control their smart home. While it’s not exactly the same, the rehydrating oven also isn’t a million miles away from the various food-related 3D printing projects we keep hearing so much about. Who knew a sci-fi comedy would get 2017 so right? (We’re not entirely sure how happy to be about that!)

Total Recall (1990)

Total Recall - Johnny Cab

Given how star-studded Paul Verhoeven’s 1990 Arnold Schwarzenegger movie Total Recall is, it’s amazing the extent to which Johnny Cab — the robot taxi driver who ferries Arnie around — steals the show.

Here in 2017, we may not yet have colonized Mars or figured out a way to successfully implant complex false memories into people’s brains (although people are working on both of these problems), but self driving cars are another thing.

Most notable is Uber, which has been field testing its fleet of autonomous robo-cabs since last year. Sadly they don’t quite have Johnny Cab’s personality. Or his driving skills, apparently.

Minority Report (2002)

Minority Report 's gesture-based user interface

In some ways, it’s no surprise that 2002’s excellent Minority Report got so much right. Unlike some of the more whimsical entries on this list, director Steven Spielberg purposely sought out real futurists and asked them to extrapolate what was happening in research labs at the time, and how this tech might look in the future.

Nonetheless, for a 15-year-old movie, it remains impressive just how accurate it is. The two big predicted innovations are gesture-based interfaces of the kind a number of researchers have tried to build, and personalized advertising which changes depending on who’s looking at it.

Just don’t get us started on predictive policing

RoboCop (1987)

ROBOCOP Original Trailer - 1987 Movie (HD)

Another Verhoeven movie (can you tell we’re fans?) that makes our list is RoboCop. Sure, you can argue that the use of drones and other robotic gadgetry employed by today’s military and law enforcement qualifies this flick for the list, but as far as we’re aware, no one has yet built a half man, half machine (all cop) cyborg to patrol the streets.

The technology which therefore counts? Facial recognition, which RoboCop uses to identify thug Emil Antonowsky following an encounter at a gas station. What seemed crazy futuristic in 1987 seems somewhat less so in an age in which facial recognition tech can unlock our smartphones.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

HAL 9000: "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that"

For this entry, we’re leaving out the thorny question of whether AI is on its way to turning malevolent and killing us all, and instead focusing on the technologies which very much exist here in the present day.

The most obvious of these in 2001: A Space Odyssey is HAL 9000 the smart AI assistant, which is capable of communicating with people using conversational commands — and is the clear antecedent of tools like Siri, Alexa, Cortana, and others.

There are also appearances from a strikingly iPad-like device, and a scene in which the character of Dr. Heywood R. Floyd makes a Skype-style video call to his family. (Although neither Arthur C. Clarke nor Stanley Kubrick apparently predicted the smartphone, based on the fact that he has to step into a special videophone booth in order to do so.)

WarGames (1983)

WarGames Official Trailer #1 - Dabney Coleman Movie (1983) HD

If you’re old enough to have watched WarGames anywhere close to its 1983 release date, you’ll remember just how amazing it was to think that one day we might be playing online games over what turned out to be the internet.

While this movie doesn’t exactly have to the carefully-researched realism of 2001: A Space Odyssey or Minority Report, it did get one thing very, very right: the major role that hacking and cyberwarfare would play in the future. That’s obviously not such a great prediction to have gotten right.

Star Trek (1966-)

Hoshi Sato Explaining the Universal Translator to School Children

It doesn’t matter which Star Trek incarnation you pick, all have included some variation of the Universal Translator: a device that’s capable of translating between languages in real time. Particularly in a utopian world like Trek’s, the Universal Translator held the promise of a future world in which people of any species could communicate with one another.

Here in 2017, devices like the Google Home can translate between languages — and even do so with convincing pronunciation. Next up? Real-time translating earbuds, apparently. Kirk would be proud!

The Jetsons (1962-)

Cinecrisis Reviews - The Jetsons Meet the Flintstones (1987)

Let’s be honest: As great as some of the technologies on this list undoubtedly are, the tech we really wanted as kids was a robot to pick up our room for us. Futuristic cartoon family The Jetsons had one and, by gum, we wanted one too!

Jump forward to the present day, and you can get cleaning robots like the Roomba that will vacuum your apartment when you’re out, ones that’ll clean your gutters, and ones that will do the weeding in your garden. What a glorious time to be alive!

Luke Dormehl
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more