Skip to main content

Swing and a miss: 6 ambitious tech ventures that failed miserably

firefox 58 may be first major browser to block canvas fingerprinting a furniture store posts  going out of
PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images
We love technologists for thinking big or, to use an old Apple slogan, “thinking different.” Daring to bust paradigms, a willingness to defy conventional wisdom, and a desire to push the envelope beyond what is currently technologically possible is the stuff that separates Steve Jobs from… well, some other guy named Steve who you’ve never heard of.

But just because a project sounds bold or overly ambitious doesn’t necessarily guarantee success. Here are six spectacular tech flops that might’ve been game changers, but never materialized in any meaningful way.

Recommended Videos

The fastest computer in the world

IBM STRETCH: A Technology Link Between Yesterday & Tomorrow

In 1956, IBM engineers set out to create the fastest supercomputer that had ever been built. Five years later, they had developed a machine called the IBM 7030, a.k.a. “Stretch,” which held the record of world’s fastest computer until 1964. So why is this project on a list of notable failures then?

One notable reason is that IBM had promised the Los Alamos National Laboratory, who the project was designed for, a computer that would be 100x faster than the machine it was meant to replace. When completed, it was only 30-40x faster. Because of this, IBM had to slash the machine’s price from $13.5 million to $7.8 million, which meant it lost money on every unit built.

In the end, IBM only built nine IBM 7030 machines, and the project was considered an ambitious failure.

What we got instead: The IBM 7030 may not have lived up to IBM’s ambitions, but it lay the groundwork for plenty of later tech advances in areas like memory protection, memory interleaving, and other innovations which have helped build faster and better machines.

Computers… in the Victoria era?

The greatest machine that never was - John Graham-Cumming

Charles Babbage is rightly considered one of the fathers of the computer industry, but you wouldn’t know it from looking at the machines he actually “shipped.” In the 1840s, he designed an enormous automated calculator called the Difference Engine, although it was never built due to the project’s enormous cost and size.

He then designed the Difference Engine No. 2, which improved capabilities while reducing the number of parts — although this too went unbuilt. One other project called the Analytical Engine (which had programs written for it by programming pioneer Ada Lovelace) also remained unbuilt in his lifetime.

What we got instead: Well, computer history as we know it. Babbage helped lay the groundwork, and while we were deprived of these steampunk marvels, things seem to have turned out pretty well. In 2002, 153 years after Babbage designed it, engineers did manage to build the world’s first complete Babbage Engine — thereby proving that the innovative design works.

Projecting the Google logo onto the Moon

moon, weirdest space missions, strange space missions, outer space
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Compared to the world’s first or fastest computers, this is a bit of an odd one, although it certainly shows off Google’s willingness to dream big. Back in 1999, when Google was just starting to gain momentum, it hired a new vice president of marketing named Scott Epstein. When Epstein sat down with Google’s founders, he found that they wanted to do something a lot more ambitious than traditional marketing — with one notable idea being to project a laser image of the Google logo on the Moon. So, you know, everyone would know about it.

We’re not sure how far this idea ever got, but as anyone who has ever looked up at night will know, it didn’t wind up happening.

What we got instead: There’s no Moon-based advertising if that’s what you’re asking. But Google did revolutionize adverts with its AdWords concept. That’s a lot more lucrative than lunar ads, although arguably less exciting.

Apple-themed eateries

Scott Olson/ Getty

Apple was a very different company in the 1990s to the tech giant that’s closing in on a trillion dollar valuation today. Before Steve Jobs made his triumphant return in 1997, Apple was suffering the negative effects of mismanagement, Microsoft dominance, and products that just didn’t seem to hit in the marketplace.

From developing games consoles with toymaker Bandai to launching a string of PDAs (personal data assistants), Apple seemingly tried everything. One of its most ambitious ideas for changing how we thought about Apple as a company? Planning the launch of a string of giant high tech Apple-themed restaurants in London, Paris, New York, Tokyo, and Sydney.

“The time is right,” Apple’s senior vice president of marketing said at the time. “Cybercafés are in … This will be a place to showcase our products in the real world.” Alongside healthy food, the cafés would feature iPad-like kiosk screens built into the tables for ordering, along with videoconferencing to other diners. Apple’s co-investors ultimately fled the deal.

What we got instead: Other than at its own headquarters, Apple has never got into the café business. The idea of chic Apple-branded stores has turned out to be an enormous success, though. Although quite possibly because they sell iPhones instead of Mac-themed beefburgers.

Project Xanadu

Ted Nelson demonstrates Xanadu Space

Compared to some of the other big names on this list, there’s a chance that you haven’t heard of Project Xanadu or its creator Ted Nelson. Regardless of that, Project Xanadu is among the most ambitious projects here, and could have changed the world far more than an Apple Café ever would.

First hypothesized about in the 1960s, when Nelson was a Harvard student, the idea was to create a massive multi-language program that could store and display editable documents, all connected through the use of hyperlinks. Consider it a cross between Wikipedia and the internet as a whole — although before word processing, hyperlinks and, well, the internet was an actual thing.

The project gained momentum in the 1970s and 80s, but ran into continual problems. Several iterations of the idea have been shown off over the years, but never enough for this to be considered a successful completed project.

What we got instead: The World Wide Web, whose emergence caused a bit of upset for the folks working on Xanadu. They accuse Tim Berners-Lee of stealing their idea, and call it a ″bizarre structure created by arbitrary initiatives of varied people,” with a “terrible programming language.”

Viewtron

AT&T Archives - The Viewtron System and Sceptre Videotex Terminal (1983)

Plenty of folks never saw the internet coming, but there were other technologists — like the aforementioned Ted Nelson — who did predict a time when we’d gather all our information from vast online archives. Viewtron was another ahead-of-its-time creation which hoped to be the World Wide Web (or, rather, the Florida Wide Web) before the real thing arrived.

Launched by Knight-Ridder and AT&T in Miami in 1983, Viewtron was a consumer videotex service, offering shopping, news, airline information, ads, and banking through a custom color graphics terminal — costing subscribers $13.20 per hour, plus $900 for the hardware. It accumulated several thousand customers, but Knight Ridder dropped it after two and a half years of launching, having invested more than $50 million.

What we got instead: As with Project Xanadu, the writing was on the wall for Viewtron the moment the less corporate World Wide Web arrived on the scene. By this point, Viewtron was already out of business. We bet that more than a few of its investors have kicked themselves over the years for not hanging on a bit longer, though.

Luke Dormehl
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more