Skip to main content

Tim Cook said Silicon Valley built a chaos factory. Are Apple’s hands clean?

Tim Cook WWDC 2019
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The King of Silicon Valley just called it a “chaos factory.”

Giving a commencement speech at Stanford University, Apple CEO Tim Cook criticized his fellow Silicon Valley giants for disregarding the privacy of their customers.

Recommended Videos

“We see it every day now, with every data breach, every privacy violation, every blind eye turned to hate speech. Fake news poisoning our national conversation. The false promise of miracles in exchange for a single drop of your blood. Too many seem to think that good intentions excuse away harmful outcomes,” Cook said.

“It feels a bit crazy that anyone should have to say this. But if you’ve built a chaos factory, you can’t dodge responsibility for the chaos. Taking responsibility means having the courage to think things through,” he continued.

Cook was not-so-subtly calling out his fellow Big Tech giants: Facebook, Google, and Amazon. It’s a sign that Apple got the memo as governments (and customers) realize just how big of an impact massive tech companies have in their lives. He’s not wrong in calling that impact chaotic. But Apple’s trying to capitalize on that chaos while protecting itself from the consequences.

As Congress, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Department of Justice move toward antitrust investigations against the big four Silicon Valley companies, Apple decided to position itself as The Good One. That’s good business, too. Cook seems to have realized something that the other tech giants have yet to embrace: Privacy is profitable.

You can see it in the latest features unveiled at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference earlier in June. The latest version of the iPhone’s operating system will come with a “Sign in with Apple” feature that allows you to log into apps without forking over your email address. Facebook, Google, Amazon have long offered a version of this login feature (tied to your email, of course), which Apple Senior Vice President of Software Engineering Craig Federighi described as “convenient” but coming at the cost of privacy — another dig at competitors.

Cook is in something of a privileged position as the least chaotic member of the chaos factory. Apple makes its money off selling you devices, whether that’s an iPhone or a MacBook, or by taking a cut of sales from its App Store. But by baking privacy into its already-expensive products, Apple’s essentially making protections for your data a luxury good.

You generally don’t pay Facebook or Google for products because they’re essentially advertising companies. They make a huge portion of their revenue via ad sales that target you down to your interests or location. Ever gotten a notification from Google about a store you just walked by? That’s because Google wants to track you and let advertisers do the same. It’s how these companies make their money.

That’s also why it’s hard to take Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg seriously when he says he wants to build a “privacy-focused social platform.”

Amazon’s something of a hybrid, but it relies on knowing everything about you so it can suggest items you’ll actually buy. There’s also Alexa, which has its own cavalcade of privacy issues — including a report that thousands of workers around the world listen to Alexa recordings.

Cook has seen what the future holds for big tech as policymakers reach a rare bipartisan consensus. The House of Representatives launched a major antitrust investigation into Facebook, Google, Apple, and Amazon earlier in June. Democratic presidential candidates like Elizabeth Warren have called for breaking up Silicon Valley’s biggest companies. The Trump Justice Department and FTC could launch antitrust investigations of their own any day now. There are also European regulators, who could make even stricter privacy rules in the aftermath of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Silicon Valley is waking up to the fact that it could be a rough couple of years. Cook is trying to get ahead of the game by expanding Apple’s privacy features and encouraging his rivals to do the same.

If lawmakers and the public continue to scrutinize big tech and privacy becomes a bigger issue, we could start to see a kind of privacy arms race. Where Apple goes, rivals tend to follow. If we’re lucky, we could see a huge ramp-up of privacy features across our devices and apps as rivals compete for customers. That might not fix the chaos factory, but it would at the very least make it a little less chaotic.

Mathew Katz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Mathew is a news editor at Digital Trends, specializing in covering all kinds of tech news — from video games to policy. He…
My iPhone 14 Pro camera is ruined, and it’s all Apple’s fault
The iPhone 14 Pro's camera module.

Every year, Apple touts the iPhone as having an incredible camera system — and, yes, the hardware is certainly impressive. The iPhone 14 Pro has the latest advancements that Apple offers in terms of camera upgrades, including a huge jump to a 48MP main camera with pixel-binning technology (four su-pixels to make up one larger pixel), a telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, faster night mode, and more. Again, on the hardware front, the iPhone 14 Pro camera looks impressive. And it is!

But what good is great camera hardware when the software continues to ruin the images you take? Ever since the iPhone 13 lineup, it seems that any images taken from an iPhone, unless it’s shot in ProRaw format, just look bad compared to those taken on older iPhones and the competing best Android phones. That’s because Apple has turned the dial way up on computational photography and post-processing each time you capture a photo. It’s ruining my images, and Apple needs to take a chill pill and take it down a notch.
These 'smart' features aren’t as smart as they claim

Read more
Google’s Android monopoly finds its biggest challenge, and Apple might be next
Apps screen on the Google Pixel 7.

The Competition Commission of India slapped Google with two hefty fines over anti-competitive strategies that have allowed it to dominate the mobile ecosystem in India. Totaling over $250 million, the penalties reprimand Google for forcing smartphone makers to avoid Android forks, prefer Google’s web search service, and pre-install popular cash cows like YouTube on phones.

Google was also disciplined for forcing its own billing system on developers that allowed the giant to take up to a 30% share of all in-app purchases for applications listed on the app store. Google is not really a stranger to titanic penalties; The EU handed Google a record-breaking fine of approximately $5 billion in 2018 for abusing its dominant market position — a penalty that was upheld in September this year following Google’s appeal.

Read more
Sorry, Google — Apple is right to keep ignoring RCS for the iPhone
Apple Messages opened on iPhone 13 Pro Max

With the release of iOS 16, Apple sees its Messages app pick up a slew of notable updates with one notable exception: RCS (Rich Chat Services).

Despite Google's continued attempts at public shaming, the iPhone maker has covered its ears and steadily plowed around in building out its own fairly successful messaging service. After a look at the state of RCS in 2022, this may just have been the right choice.
RCS is still a mess

Read more