Skip to main content

Amazon faces heat from federal labor board for alleged retaliation

Amazon workers in Chicago have filed complaints with a federal labor board, claiming they were retaliated against for speaking out against the company, according to a report in Buzzfeed News.

The Chicago employees filed charges against Amazon alleging they were retaliated against for protesting working conditions during the coronavirus outbreak, kicking off an inquiry from federal labor regulators, Buzzfeed News reports, in what experts say is an “unusual” move. The complaint says that Amazon targeted the workers specifically because they spoke out against the company and that the tech giant’s claims that workers violated social distancing rules are a ruse.

Recommended Videos

In a statement to Digital Trends, Amazon spokesperson Av Zammit said the allegations made by the Chicago workers were “simply unfounded.”

“Nothing is more important than the health and safety of our teams,” Zammit said. “Since the early days of this situation, we have worked closely with health authorities to proactively respond, ensuring we continue to serve people while taking care of our associates and teams. We have also implemented proactive measures at our facilities to protect employees, including mandatory social distancing, adding distance between drivers and people in the community when making deliveries, and providing masks for everyone to use, as we remain committed to keeping our teams healthy and safe.”

Zammit said Amazon has added new protections and benefits for workers since the coronavirus pandemic began to spread, including increased normal and overtime pay for warehouse workers and paid sick-leave for part-timers.

According to Buzzfeed, federal labor regulators declined to punish Amazon in one particular instance, saying the company’s conduct was unlawful but didn’t represent a pattern. However, the decision from regulators opened up the possibility for punishment if other valid claims against Amazon come forward in the next six months.

Amazon’s response to the crisis has been criticized by some of its workers as insufficient — and has led to allegations of retaliation. In New York City, worker Chris Smalls was fired after organizing a strike by workers at a Staten Island warehouse. Amazon claims Smalls was fired for violating orders to quarantine himself, which Smalls denied.

A reportedly leaked memo from Amazon detailed a PR strategy of shifting blame onto Smalls to make him the “the face of the entire union/organizing movement.”

Two other employees were fired after being vocally critical of safety conditions at Amazon’s warehouses.

The two employees in question, Emily Cunningham and Maren Costa, were members of a worker’s group called Amazon Employees for Climate Justice and had tweeted about Amazon’s treatment of its warehouse workers.

An Amazon representative told Digital Trends at the time that they were fired for “repeatedly violating internal policies.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated the incident Amazon was being investigated for. The inquiry relates to Amazon’s alleged treatment of workers in Chicago.
Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
The uncertain future cost of Apple’s Emergency SOS feature
Person holding iPhone 14 searching for Emergency SOS satellite.

It's been roughly two years since the launch of the iPhone 14 and its Emergency SOS via satellite feature. You might recall that during the first two years, Apple said it would be free to use but that it might require a subscription after that time, according to MacRumors. Last year, Apple extended the time limit by one more year, so you actually have until November 2025, when the trial period ends.

That's good news. The Emergency SOS feature is, quite literally, lifesaving. During April of this year, three university students lost their way in a canyon and used the feature to call for help. Another story arose in July where the feature came through once more in a moment of crisis. And if you keep digging, you'll find numerous other examples of how this tech is truly beneficial.

Read more
Apple’s smart home display already sounds like a convenience victory
Nest Hub Max

Over the past few weeks, rumors of Apple developing a smart display for home control have picked up pace. The company is said to be developing two versions, and one of them might even feature a robotic arm and revive an iconic Mac’s design. 

Now, Bloomberg has shared some juicy details about how the entry-level option will look and work. The device will offer a 6-inch screen with a square-ish format flanked by sensors, including a FaceTime camera in landscape orientation. 

Read more