Skip to main content

Nokia files fresh patent action against Apple

Nokia Head Office (Espoo)
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Finland’s Nokia is upping the ante in its patent battle with Apple, announcing that it has filed a new complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission saying that essentially all Apple hardware products—from iPhones and iPads to iPods to Macintosh computers—infringe on a variety of Nokia patents. The new complaint adds seven new patents covering technologies like multi-tasking, data synchronization, call quality, and interacting with Bluetooth accessories.

“Our latest ITC filing means we now have 46 Nokia patents in suit against Apple, many filed more than ten years before Apple made its first iPhone,” said Nokia VP of intellectual property Paul Melin, in a statement. “Nokia is a leading innovator in technologies needed to build great mobile products and Apple must stop building its products using Nokia’s proprietary innovation.”

Recommended Videos

The move comes just after a judge at the U.S. ITC ruled last week that Apple did not violate any of the patents cited in Nokia’s original complaint (PDF). Although the judge’s ruling is preliminary—a hearing will be held in a few month’s time on whether to sustain the judge’s ruling—the finding is a distinct setback for Nokia’s infringement complaints against Apple.

Nokia has indicated it does not agree with the initial determination and is waiting to see the full details of the ruling before determining how to proceed.

Nokia filed its original claim with the USITC back in late 2009, triggering a tit-for-tat battle of suits and countersuits between the companies. Nokia also has legal action pending against apple in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, and the U.S. state of Delaware.

Apple declined to comment on Nokia’s latest complaint.

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Learn from my mistakes: Don’t settle for a cheap tablet like the Nokia T20
Screens on the iPad Pro and Nokia T20 tablets.

The Nokia T20 has prompted a tablet epiphany. I have owned many different tablets over the years, with my lifestyle fitting the functionality they offer. Still, unfortunately, most of them have quickly been discarded due to never living up to expectations or failing to keep up with my usage. All except for the Apple iPad, that is. I’ve owned several generations, and none have been hidden away in the "tech drawer of doom."

Over the last few weeks, I’ve been using the Nokia T20 tablet, and it has finally brought about that epiphany. I've refused to believe it for ages, but I now can safely say that if you want a tablet, it’s absolutely worth paying more to get an iPad.
So many tablets
I don’t know what it is about the tablet in general. Maybe it’s because it can seem more frivolous than a smartphone, but I have often thought I should be able to buy a cheapish one and have it to satisfy my relatively basic needs. Over the years, I have used, purchased, or reviewed tablets made by Samsung, Huawei, Xiaomi, Lenovo, Amazon, and a few others. The ones I’ve bought personally have been cheaper models, usually spotted in a sale, but absolutely none of them are in use today. Poor software, substandard screens, and creaky performance almost immediately put me off, and after using them for a bit, they’d get retired.

Read more
Judge rules against both Apple and Epic Games in antitrust case
A man checks his phone in an Apple retail store in Grand Central Terminal.

United States District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers delivered a notable setback to Apple’s in-app purchases Friday morning. In a blow to the tech giant, Apple cannot prohibit developers from including external purchase buttons in the App Store. In other words, Apple will be required to allow apps to offer external purchasing options on their store pages. According to the ruling, this change is scheduled to take effect December 9, 2021.

The ruling provides more context for the battle of Epic Games versus Apple. Because Gonzalez Rogers ruled in favor of another claim brought on by Apple against Epic Games, the gaming giant will be required to pay Apple $3.6 million. This ruling harks back to their lengthy Fortnite fight, in which Epic offered direct external purchasing options in exchange for in-game discounts.

Read more
Apple cautions against placing iPhone 12 near a pacemaker
iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro

Anyone fitted with a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is likely to already be well versed in the potential dangers of getting close to a powerful magnet.

Still, Apple, keen to keep its customers safe and to avoid some ghastly news headline linked to its products, is cautioning those with an iPhone 12 and any MagSafe accessories to keep them a safe distance away from particular medical implants. This is because the iPhone 12 contains magnets as part of its new MagSafe feature (the iPhone 12 contains more magnets than previous models) as well as components and radios that emit electromagnetic fields. MagSafe accessories also contain magnets, while the MagSafe Charger and the MagSafe Duo Charger contain radios, too.

Read more