Skip to main content

Pioneer spins into DJ market with potent, portable, powered speakers

pioner-s-dj05While at CEDIA last week, we couldn’t help but notice that several manufacturers were doing their best to make it known they had moved into the powered-speaker market. Monster Cable was sure to show off its Clarity HD Model 1, Paradigm was rocking the recently introduced Active Atom and now Pioneer, as it turns out, is calling attention to its take on the powered speaker. 

One might naturally ask: How are these different from computer and desktop audio systems? Well, for one thing, these powered speakers are on an entirely different level from a build- and sound-quality standpoint. Whereas most computer speakers are designed to sound good for games, movies and casual music listening, they aren’t nearly accurate enough for use by a recording artist, DJ or studio producer. Now that all three of those roles are more and more commonly handled by the same person, the importance of combining accurate sound reproduction with versatile connectivity and control are paramount. 

Recommended Videos

Pioneer’s S-DJ05 and S-DJ08 appear to hit all of those points and then some. As the model names imply, the two are differentiated by 5-inch and 8-inch midbass drivers (the S-DJ05 are pictured above). If there’s a difference in amplification power, Pioneer isn’t disclosing it, but we do know that each speaker is bi-amplified. 

The soft dome tweeter is touted as having outstanding dispersion with very even response across a wide axis. This would allow several listeners to crowd around the speakers and hear essentially the same quality audio. To further refine the sound, Pioneer has used a flared port on the front of the cabinet to focus chuff-free bass directly at the listener. 

Both models offer some  impressive connectivity with balanced XLR inputs, balanced 1/4-inch inputs and two RCA inputs found on the back of each speaker. Along with all the inputs are two EQ dials for high- and low-frequency adjustments.

The control module, which looks a lot like the sort we’ve seen with computer speakers, offers enough control to alter volume and EQ, and switch among any of the speakers’ four inputs. This means that at the press of one button, one could listen to a digital synthesizer one minute, switch to a mixing board the next, then route the sound through a couple of effects processors and be compared instantly. 

While Pioneer is clearly steering these speakers toward the the DJ crowd, we can see them as being useful for all sorts applications; a desktop audio system, mobile recording studio or a musician’s personal monitor, perhaps. The question remains, however: Do they actually sound good? At $899 per pair for the S-DJ05 and $1199 for the S-DJ08, we certainly hope so. Of course, we’ll know for sure soon enough. We expect our review samples to arrive shortly and we’ll report our observations soon. 

Caleb Denison
Digital Trends Editor at Large Caleb Denison is a sought-after writer, speaker, and television correspondent with unmatched…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more