Skip to main content

Strangely chonky exoplanet has astronomers puzzled

Astronomers recently discovered a hefty exoplanet orbiting a star similar to our sun. At just 15 million years old, this chunky planet is a baby by galactic standards, old, but it has researchers puzzled due to its tremendous density.

The planet, called HD 114082 b, is similar in size to Jupiter, but seems to have eight times its mass. It’s common for astronomers to discover gas giants similar to or larger than Jupiter, but it’s very unusual to discover a planet this dense and heavy.  “Compared to currently accepted models, HD 114082 b is about two to three times too dense for a young gas giant with only 15 million years of age,” said lead author Olga Zakhozhay in a statement.

Artist’s conception of a gas giant exoplanet orbiting around a Sun-like star. The young exoplanet HD 114082 b revolves around its Sun-like star within 110 days at a distance of 0.5 astronomical units.
Artist’s conception of a gas giant exoplanet orbiting around a sun-like star. The young exoplanet HD 114082 b revolves around its sun-like star within 110 days at a distance of 0.5 astronomical units. NASA/JPL-Caltech

If the mass measurements of this planet are correct, that would make it twice as dense as Earth — and Earth is already a dense planet, being a rocky type with a metal core. It could be that because the planet is so young, there is something about the way gas giants form that we are not yet aware of.

Recommended Videos

“We think that giant planets can form in two possible ways,” Ralf Launhardt, a co-author from the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, says. “Both occur inside a protoplanetary disk of gas and dust distributed around a young central star.”

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The first approach to how planets might form is called core accretion, in which a small core attracts other particles, which collide and stick to it until it becomes the starting point of a planet. The second theory is called disk instability, in which there is a disk of matter that cools and then splits into planet-sized chunks.

Most astronomers lean toward the core accretion theory, but this planet doesn’t fit that model. If it were formed by core accretion, you’d expect it to start off hotter than in the disk instability model, and hot gas should puff up to a larger volume. The small volume of this planet is a better fit with the less popular disk instability model.

However, there are many open questions about how planets form and how quickly they cool after formation. “It’s much too early to abandon the notion of a hot start,” said Launhardt. “All we can say is that we still don’t understand the formation of giant planets very well.”

The research will be published as a letter to the editor in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
Why the SpaceX Crew-9 launch has been delayed again
NASA’s SpaceX Crew-9 Commander Nick Hague smiles and gives two thumbs up during the crew equipment interface test at SpaceX’s Dragon refurbishing facility at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

The SpaceX Crew-9 mission, which will see just two astronauts head to the International Space Station (ISS) with two empty seats on their Crew Dragon spacecraft, has been delayed once again. This time, however, the delay is only one day, with the new launch date set for September 26.

The mission had originally been slated to launch on August 18 with four crew members, but this was pushed back to allow time for the troubled Boeing Starliner capsule to return, uncrewed, from the station. NASA decided that its astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, who traveled to the station on the Starliner, would stay on the station and become a part of Crew-9 -- so the two empty seats on the Dragon are reserved for them to travel home in in February next year.

Read more
James Webb is explaining the puzzle of some of the earliest galaxies
This image shows a small portion of the field observed by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope’s NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) for the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) survey. It is filled with galaxies. The light from some of them has traveled for over 13 billion years to reach the telescope.

From practically the moment it was turned on, the James Webb Space Telescope has been shaking cosmology. In some of its very earliest observations, the telescope was able to look back at some of the earliest galaxies ever observed, and it found something odd: These galaxies were much brighter than anyone had predicted. Even when the telescope's instruments were carefully calibrated over the few weeks after beginning operations, the discrepancy remained. It seemed like the early universe was a much busier, brighter place than expected, and no one knew why.

This wasn't a minor issue. The fact early galaxies appeared to be bigger or brighter than model predicted meant that something was off about the way we understood the early universe. The findings were even considered "universe breaking." Now, though, new research suggests that the universe isn't broken -- it's just that there were early black holes playing tricks.

Read more
Mars has ‘oceans’ worth’ of water – but it’s deep underground
More than 3 billion years ago, Mars was warm, wet, and had an atmosphere that could have supported life. This artist's rendering shows what the planet may have looked like with global oceans based on today's topography.

One of the key issues for getting humans to Mars is finding a way to get them water. Scientists know that millions of years ago, Mars was covered in oceans, but the planet lost its water over time and now has virtually no liquid water on its surface. Now, though, researchers have identified what they believe could be oceans' worth of water on Mars. There's just one snag: it's deep underground.

The research used data from NASA's now-retired InSight lander, which used a seismometer and other instruments to investigate the planet's interior. They found evidence of what appears to be a large underground reservoir of water, enough to cover the entire planet in about a mile of ocean. But it's inaccessible, being located between 7 to 13 miles beneath the planet's surface. The water is located in between cracks in a portion of the interior called the mid-crust, which sits beneath the dry upper crust that is drillable from the surface.

Read more