Skip to main content

Why James Cameron’s proposed Terminator reboot shouldn’t happen

Director James Cameron recently proposed his plan to reboot the Terminator franchise … again. In an interview on the podcast “SmartLess,” Cameron said: “If I were to do another Terminator film and maybe try to launch that franchise again, which is in discussion, but nothing has been decided, I would make it much more about the AI side of it than bad robots gone crazy.”

While this sounds like an interesting idea, the Terminator franchise has been rebooted multiple times before. Even though this proposed sequel could rectify the failures of its many previous movies, there are plenty of reasons why it’s high time to put the iconic sci-fi franchise to rest.

Recommended Videos

Franchise fatigue

Edward Furlong and Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator 2.
TriStar Pictures

Nearly 40 years after the first Terminator movie premiered, audiences seem to have gotten tired of the franchise after seeing its many follow-up films. The saga very much peaked with 1991’s Terminator 2: Judgment Day in terms of quality and profitability, and it has since delivered many lackluster films, including Rise of the Machines, Salvation, Genisys, and Dark Fate.

Seeing how Dark Fate was just the latest Terminator film to fail at the box office, it’s clear that people have lost interest in watching the titular killing machines come back time and time again. Unless the filmmakers use a smaller budget for a new sequel, they could risk making another box-office bomb.

It only worked with Cameron as director

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The two most successful Terminator films were the first two directed by Cameron, and the critical and commercial decline that followed is evidence that the movies only worked when the man who started them all was at the helm. Aside from being a producer and co-writer for Dark Fate, Cameron hasn’t really been involved in the Terminator franchise since he directed Judgment Day.

While the films made after Judgment Day were directed by the likes of Jonathan Mostow (Breakdown, U-571), McG (Charlie’s Angels, The Babysitter), Alan Taylor (Game of Thrones, The Sopranos), and Tim Miller (Deadpool, Love, Death & Robots), they still didn’t achieve the same level of acclaim as Cameron’s movies. It would probably best serve any future Terminator films if Cameron returned to direct them himself. However, he will be very busy directing his next three Avatar sequels for the rest of this decade, so it’s unlikely he’ll have the time or energy to focus on another Terminator movie.

The Terminators are pretty much the same

The T-1000 wagging it's finger in "Terminator 2: Judgment Day."
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Judgment Day reinvigorated the standard Terminator with the shapeshifting T-1000, a significant upgrade of the T-800. However, the Terminators that followed have since modeled themselves onthe T-1000 to the point that there not so different from each other. Machines like the T-X and the Rev-9 continue to share the ability to shap-eshift, regenerate, and create weapons, with only slight variations in their abilities.

The T-3000 from Genisys did use nanotechnology and introduced the ability to infect humans and turn them into Terminators. Even so, it still showed no significant difference from the T-1000, and it did not live up to its full creative potential as a walking, mechanical virus.

There’s nothing new to do with the story

Linda Hamilton and Natalia Reyes in Terminator: Dark Fate.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

After six movies and a short-lived series on Fox, there seems to be essentially nothing new that could be done with the franchise that would justify another big-budget reboot. Fans have seen John and Sarah Connor trying to elude the time-traveling Terminators many times before. They’ve also already seen John fighting Skynet’s army of machines as the leader of the resistance in Terminator: Salvation.

Even when Dark Fate created a new timeline with new characters, the overall story was still the same, with Sarah Connor and a Terminator once again trying to protect the future savior of humanity from an evil AI. Also, the fact that Dark Fate had new female characters fill in the archetypes created with John Connor and Kyle Reese came across to many people as a hollow attempt to appeal to modern audiences. All in all, Hollywood has tried and failed to repeat the same formula that made the first two Terminator films successful, and there doesn’t seem to be a better path for the franchise in sight.

It already has the perfect ending

T-800 giving a thumbs-up in "Terminator 2: Judgment Day."
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Though filmmakers have tried to keep the Terminator going for as long as they could, the overall story already found the best possible conclusion with Judgment Day. Not only did the film end with Sarah and the T-800 defeating the T-1000 and saving John’s life, but they also succeeded in creating a future of their own by preventing Skynet’s creation, with the heroic T-800 making the ultimate sacrifice to save humanity’s future by having himself destroyed.

The continuous retcons and timeline changes that have since been made have diminished the impact of Judgment Day, ruining what could have been the perfect ending for John and Sarah Connor. The filmmakers only rubbed more salt into the wound when Dark Fate killed off John in its very first scene, which made all the heroes’ efforts to protect him from the Terminators feel pointless.

Anthony Orlando
Anthony Orlando is a writer/director from Oradell, NJ. He spent four years at Lafayette College, graduating CUM LAUDE with a…
The Flash director says the film failed because people ‘don’t care’ about the DC hero
Barry Allen runs through the Speed Force in The Flash.

It's been nearly two years since The Flash hit theaters in 2023, and the film remains one of the most infamous bombs in recent comic book movie history. Its director, Andy Muschietti, isn't confused about why the film failed, though. During an interview on Radio Tu’s La Baulera del Coso, Muschietti said that he believes The Flash performed so poorly because it wasn't as widely appealing as everyone, including himself and its producers at Warner Bros. Pictures, hoped it would be.

"The Flash failed, among all the other reasons, because it wasn’t a movie that appealed to all four quadrants. It failed at that,” Muschietti argued. “When you spend $200 million making a movie, [Warner Bros.] wants you to bring even your grandmother to the theaters.”

Read more
Sebastian Stan says Thunderbolts is Marvel’s Breakfast Club
Bucky Barnes stands in the desert in Marvel's Thunderbolts.

Marvel Studios may have released only one film last year, but it has three theatrical titles coming in 2025. The movies in question -- February's Captain America: Brave New World, May's Thunderbolts*, and July's The Fantastic Four: First Steps -- all promise to move the Marvel Cinematic Universe's Multiverse Saga forward in their own unique ways. The three also seem very different from each other. Brave New World, for instance, is being marketed as a paranoid political thriller, while Fantastic Four has seemingly adopted a retro-futuristic, '60s-inspired aesthetic.

As for Thunderbolts*, one of the film's stars says that it has more in common with a classic 1980s coming-of-age dramedy than comic book fans may expect. "Thunderbolts* is really interesting because it was so fun, man," Sebastian Stan, who is set to make his MCU return as Bucky Barnes in the forthcoming film, revealed during his recent appearance on Variety's Awards Circuit Podcast. "I'm curious to see how people are going to respond [to it] because the closest [film] that comes [to mind] is that movie The Breakfast Club."

Read more
5 years ago, this sci-fi Alien rip-off drowned at the box office. Is it worthy of reappraisal?
The aqua suits in the movie Underwater

Five years ago in January 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic started to make its first headlines, a different kind of disaster arrived in movie theaters: Underwater. The movie starred Kristen Stewart, and based on the trailers, it looked to pay homage to older sci-fi horror classics. Yet Underwater turned out to be a super clunky, visually murky, and ill-paced film about a deep-sea mining station at the bottom of the Mariana Trench that inadvertently wakes up a giant deep-sea monster.

In theory, Underwater should have been enjoyable. Even if it added nothing to the genre and was just a poor homage to Alien, Cloverfield, and The Abyss, it should have been at least derivative fun. But it wasn't, and audiences stayed away from the big-budget film. So what went wrong, and is Underwater worth watching five years later now that it's available to stream at home?
Why Underwater is a Cthulhu-sized disaster
Underwater | Official Trailer [HD] | 20th Century FOX

Read more