Skip to main content

This horror remake shocked audiences 5 years ago. Here’s why you should watch it this Halloween

A girl knocks at a mirror door in 2018's Suspiria.
Amazon Studios

Even for a filmmaker as celebrated as Luca Guadagnino, remaking one of the most beloved and iconic horror movies in history isn’t an easy thing to do. Nonetheless, just one year after Call Me By Your Name launched him to the top of the international cinema scene, that’s exactly what the director did. Assembling a crew of talented collaborators, including Dakota Johnson, Tilda Swinton, modern Scream Queen Mia Goth, and Radiohead’s Thom Yorke, Guadagnino set out in 2016 to finally make his own interpretation of Dario Argento’s giallo horror classic, Suspiria.

The resulting film, an oppressively drab, operatic exploration of supernatural horror, looks and feels like a purposeful counter to the Argento original, rather than a straightforward remake. Guadagnino’s Suspiria eschews many of its predecessor’s defining aspects — namely, its vibrant color palette, surrealist direction, and prog rock score. For these reasons, the film proved somewhat divisive, and its box office earnings left plenty to be desired. In 2018, the general consensus seemed to be that the remake was an audacious, if not entirely successful, creative experiment for Guadagnino.

Recommended Videos

Five years later, the achievements of Suspiria, one of the best horror movies on Prime Video, seem more obvious now than they did before. Time has cleared away the furrowed-brow haze of uncertainty that initially surrounded the film, and revealed it to be a refreshing spiritual successor to its predecessor, one that doesn’t so much build on what came before as it does beautifully, hauntingly complement it.

Tilda Swinton kneels alone in a room in Suspiria (2018).
Amazon Studios

Luca Guadagnino’s Suspiria sticks to the same basic plot as the 1977 original. The film follows Susie Bannion (Dakota Johnson), an ambitious young American girl, as she gets accepted into a prestigious European dance academy, only to find herself manipulated and targeted by the coven of witches who secretly control it. As more of her fellow dancers begin to disappear and die under mysterious circumstances, Susie’s interest in the academy’s history and hidden power structure grows.

Unlike the original Suspiria, Guadagnino’s remake takes place specifically during the German Autumn of 1977, a period of kidnappings, assassinations, and political demonstrations that saw the long-simmering frustration, resentment, and guilt of a still-divided post-war Berlin violently bubble to the surface. The film, penned by David Kajganich, spends arguably a bit too long on its historical setting, which doesn’t so much directly connect to its witchy main plot as it does thematically reinforce it. That said, the German Autumn not only helps 2018’s Suspiria establish a suffocating atmosphere of unseen evil and terror, but also sets the stage for its subversive, nightmarish climax.

The film’s final act notably deviates from the blueprint set by Argento’s Suspiria, which tells a familiar Final Girl horror story from beginning to end. In Guadagnino’s version, Dakota Johnson’s Susie doesn’t just survive the horrors of her dance academy’s supernaturally parasitic culture, but holds those at the head of it accountable. This last-minute narrative swerve plays as both a grotesque response to the German Autumn and a compellingly contemporary update on the ending of the original Suspiria. Maybe, Guadagnino’s Suspiria argues, it’s not enough to just survive.

Dakota Johnson holds up her hands in Suspiria (2018).
Amazon Studios

Its thematic complexities aside, 2018’s Suspiria plays as a frequently hypnotic stylistic companion to its 1977 predecessor. The film is visually desaturated and cold in a way that the original Suspiria, with all of its rich blues, pinks, and reds, decidedly is not. Whereas Argento’s film delights in using the surreal architecture of its sets and its director’s own inimitable visual style to trap its characters in overly complex death traps, Guadagnino’s remake relies on stomach-churning body horror and precise crosscutting as its primary vehicles for death and destruction.

The film uses its dance academy setting — little more than set dressing in the 1977 original — as the source of its witches’ magic and its own instances of horror. There’s a physicality to Guadagnino’s Suspiria that is largely absent from Argento’s, one that turns the female bodies of its characters into instruments for both unmistakable beauty and death. Never is that demonstrated more brutally than in the film’s most well-known scene, which editorially links a dance by Johnson’s Susie to the violent death of one of her fellow students.

These creative choices make the Suspiria remake a fascinating reinterpretation of the Argento original. The latter is a visually stunning surrealist exercise in cinematic horror. Its pleasures are largely formal and superficial. Guadagnino’s Suspiria, conversely, is more concerned with externalizing the disturbing interior spaces of its characters. Over the course of its 152-minute runtime, it emerges as a more narratively ambitious, psychologically demanding film than its predecessor, but one that is no less bloodthirsty or violently expressive. Regardless of which you prefer, if time has proven anything, it’s that 2018’s Suspiria deserves to exist right alongside the classic that inspired it. Both offer experiences that are, in their own ways, unforgettable.

Suspiria (2018) is streaming now on Amazon Prime Video.

Alex Welch
Alex is a writer and critic who has been writing about and reviewing movies and TV at Digital Trends since 2022. He was…
The best Western of the 21st century is now on Netflix. Here’s why you should watch it
Three men hold guns in 3:10 to Yuma.

Once one of Hollywood's most popular and acclaimed genres, the Western is now a shadow of its glorious former self. During the mid-1940s, all the way to the late 1960s, the genre peaked, and many of the greatest Western movies came out, defining the myth of the Old West and cementing the cowboy as the defining figure of American identity. New Hollywood turned its attention elsewhere, and the genre slowly declined in popularity. However, the gritty nature of post-New Hollywood movies gave birth to the neo-Western genre, which endures to this day.

In 2007, James Mangold boldly took one of the best Westerns of the 1950s, Delmer Daves' 3:10 to Yuma, and remade it under a neo-Western approach. Starring Oscar winners Christian Bale and Russell Crowe, the film follows a small posse tasked with transporting the dangerous criminal Ben Wade to the town of Contention, where he is to board the 3:10 train to Yuma prison. Although acclaimed at the time of release, Mangold's 3:10 to Yuma has never received the attention or praise it rightfully deserves. Fortunately, this modern Western gem is now on Netflix, meaning it's the perfect chance for you to check it out. If you haven't, you absolutely should because it is probably the best Western to have come out this century; here's why.
It has brilliant performances from Christian Bale and Russell Crowe

Read more
Netflix is now streaming one of the scariest TV shows ever. Here’s why you should watch it
A man looks frightened in The Terror.

Netflix has added another horror treasure to its digital library with AMC's supernatural anthology series The Terror. Each season of this show features a standalone story in the vein of American Horror Story. But unlike the latter show, The Terror presents a more grounded and less stylized picture of horror by blending reality and folklore in a distinctive way.

After having won the Satellite Award for Best Genre Series, The Terror has proven itself a modern horror classic just waiting to be seen by more audiences. Here's why they should check out this acclaimed anthology this August.
It's a classical approach to horror

Read more
35 years ago, this underrated sequel radically changed an iconic horror series
A nun stands in a church in A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child.

Horror sequels are typically pretty awful. There are exceptions, of course. Evil Dead 2 is more beloved than the first one, and both Halloween III: Season of the Witch and Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter have their devoted fans. But those films are exceptions to the rule. For every Evil Dead 2, there are hundreds of The Exorcist IIs.

In the A Nightmare on Elm Street series, the third entry, The Dream Warriors, is generally considered the best sequel. It delved into Freddy Krueger's origin, brought back original series star Heather Langenkamp, and featured a cast of rising actors that included then-unknowns Patricia Arquette and Laurence Fishburne.

Read more