Skip to main content

AMD’s FSR 3 will finally get a chance to shine in Starfield

A man walking into a dusty town on another planet in starfield.
Bethesda Game Studios

Starfield was mired in controversy on PC both prior to launching and after the game was finally released, but developer Bethesda seems committed to patching it into a better state. The studio has confirmed that the game will receive an update for both Nvidia’s Deep Learning Super Sampling 3 (DLSS 3) and AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3).

We’ve known for weeks that DLSS 3 was coming to the game. Bethesda confirmed support about a week after release, following a wave of backlash over the fact that the game exclusively used AMD’s FSR 2. The company says DLSS 3 is coming to a Steam Beta update next week, and it will roll out to all PC and Xbox players shortly after.

Note, DLSS is for PC Nvidia users only. We’ll also have AMD FSR3 support in a future update.

— Bethesda Game Studios (@BethesdaStudios) November 1, 2023

The big update here is AMD’s FSR 3, though. After a long year of waiting, FSR 3 arrived with barely a whimper in ho-hum titles like Immortals of Aveum and Forspoken. Given that AMD claimed it was “PC exclusive partner” for Starfieldmany assumed that FSR 3 would debut alongside the game. That wasn’t the case, and we haven’t gotten confirmation that FSR 3 would be added to the game until now.

It’s a big deal, as the outlook for FSR 3 up to this point hasn’t been great. Both Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum weren’t blockbuster releases, and upcoming releases sporting the tech like Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora haven’t generated the same anticipation as a game like Starfield. That left us to assume Starfield would never get FSR 3 support. In AMD’s reveal of FSR 3, just days before the release of Starfield, the company was shockingly quiet about Bethesda’s space-bound RPG.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Adding on top of that disappointment has been AMD’s Fluid Motion Frames (AFMF). The tech was supposed to add frame generation to thousands of games through AMD’s driver, but after releasing, it was discovered that AFMF would turn itself off during fast motion. That led to a situation where the frame rate would massively fluctuate during gameplay in titles that didn’t officially support FSR 3.

The inclusion of FSR 3 in Starfield shows that AMD’s tech has legs, though. We still don’t know when the update will arrive, with Bethesda simply saying it will arrive in “a future update.”

Although the updates are focused on PC, it’s worth noting that Bethesda didn’t say the FSR 3 update would be exclusive to PC. Unlike Nvidia’s DLSS 3, FSR 3 works on consoles in addition to PC. It could be a massive benefit to Starfield on consoles, which is otherwise restricted to a locked 30 frames per second. It will certainly benefit PCs that can’t use DLSS 3, as Starfield‘s PC performance still isn’t great.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Final Fantasy XVI already runs incredibly on PC, but there’s one problem
Clive fighting an enemy in Final Fantasy 16.

The moment Final Fantasy XVI hit Steam, I had the download queued. I plan on doing a closer look at the PC release once it arrives on September 17, but after playing through the opening section of the game, it's already looking like a promising PC port. It's well-optimized on the CPU, there are a ton of graphics options, and it's loaded with PC gaming tech. There's just one problem I'd like to see addressed before launch.

That mainly concerns the game's PlayStation 5 roots, where it ran either at 30 frames per second (fps) in resolution mode, or a wildly unstable 60 fps in its performance mode. Despite the PC release supporting frame rates up to 240 fps and running much smoother on modern hardware, its basis on PS5 still shows up, particularly in cutscenes.
Cutscene woes

Read more
AMD has nothing to lose, and that’s the problem
AMD CEO holding a Ryzen 7000 processor.

Being the underdog has its benefits. AMD's been running on the sheer momentum of its uphill battle against Intel -- and it's been working.

Over the past seven years, AMD has gone from being a second-rate CPU builder, only judged by its undercutting of the competition from Intel, to an absolute titan. Each generation, it has consistently released some of the best processors money can buy, and even when Intel bites back, AMD holds strong.

Read more
No one is buying AMD’s new Zen 5 CPUs, and it’s painfully obvious why
The Ryzen 9 9900X sitting on its box.

AMD's new Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X, which were aimed at claiming a spot among the best processors, are off to a rocky start. According to early sales numbers from German retailer Mindfactory, the number of new AMD CPUs the website has shipped is only in the double digits, despite being on the market for nearly a week.

Mindfactory is only one retailer, but it actually displays the number of products it sold on its website. The Ryzen 5 9600X has seen over 20 sales, while the Ryzen 7 9700X has had over 30. You can see the lack of enthusiasm for Zen 5 CPUs elsewhere, though. On Amazon's bestsellers page, the last-gen Ryzen 7 7800X3D ranks in the first spot. The first Zen 5 CPU on the list, the Ryzen 7 9700X, is in 47th place.

Read more