Skip to main content

NASA is hiding solar UFOs, claims YouTube user

Image used with permission by copyright holder

As space geeks will tell you, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory is a pretty neat tool for exploring our solar system. Created in 1995 as a joint effort from NASA and the European Space Agency, the Observatory’s role is to gather information about the sun. Pictures, activity data, radiation level readings; that sort of thing. To date SOHO has been pretty successful. Originally scheduled for a mere two year solar study, the Observatory is still staring at the sun, almost 17 years later.

However, this successful information gathering campaign has also generated its share of controversy. Not over the expense of the project or the ethical ramifications of widening our understanding of mankind’s role in the cosmos, but instead SOHO has lead a surprising number of people to believe that NASA is picking up images of aliens, then blatantly lying to the general public about them.

Recommended Videos

Below this text you will find a video created by YouTube user “rob19791.” In it he republishes images captured by SOHO on May 3, dramatically zooming in on a certain object in the picture that he claims is a UFO. NASA, in turn, claims that the object is the result of cosmic rays affecting its cameras.

Then, on May 4, the satellite that captured the images went offline. According to NASA, “SOHO went into ‘Emergency Sun Reacquisition’ mode on Friday May 4, 2012, caused by a false trigger of the Coarse Sun Pointing Attitude Anomaly Detector.” In other words, a glitch. The space agency claims to be working on a fix for the problem, but so far has no information on when this particular imaging system will be back up and running.

This is crucial, because it set off a firestorm of YouTube controversy. As you can see in the below video, rob19791 believes that NASA purposely took the cameras down to prevent mankind from seeing the truth about this Sol-obsessed UFO (or, at the very least, that it is trying to prevent us from noticing an apocalyptic solar flare that will kill us all). “NASA are clearly trying to stop us looking at the sun,” he writes. “The reasons could be anything from the crafts/ships seen recently or an impending solar flare that will wipe out humanity.”

It wouldn’t be fair for us to take sides in this conflict, so instead we leave it to you, dear reader: Who do you trust more? NASA, a multi-billion dollar space agency whose funding relies almost entirely on actually finding new and interesting things out there to study, or rob19791, some dude with a YouTube account?

Earnest Cavalli
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Earnest Cavalli has been writing about games, tech and digital culture since 2005 for outlets including Wired, Joystiq…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more