Skip to main content

We can build Star Trek’s Enterprise, says engineer with tons of free time

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Everyone likes Star Trek. Even if you aren’t a fan of the show itself, you have to respect the ideals it contains. Peaceful exploration of space and making friends with weird, sexy aliens is the kind of thing mankind should aspire to. Its just too bad we’ll never be able to build a ship like the USS Enterprise to ferry us around the cosmos, huh?

Not so fast, bucko! It turns out that we totally can build the Enterprise. At least, according to this exhaustively detailed website.

Recommended Videos

Created by a relatively anonymous Trek fan who has spent the past 30 years working as an electrical and systems engineer at a Fortune 500 company, the site actually offers a well thought-out, surprisingly sane argument for why and how this project should be undertaken. He’s realistic about the difficulties of finding funding for the ship, and agrees that there are almost definitely political roadblocks to this thing’s completion, but beyond that he offers a host of compelling information.

He’s even got the “why” of this whole thing covered:

The USS Enterprise from Star Trek is a cultural icon, and we should latch part of the US space program on to this icon and build from there. We need a far grander vision of what we should be doing to get humans up into space and how we might gain a permanent foothold there. If we aren’t going to get a sustainable presence up there, then we should stop spending money for putting humans into space and instead focus on robotic missions like sending more advanced rovers to Mars, Venus, and elsewhere. If we are going to ask taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for projects to put Americans into space, it should be for an idea that they can relate to and be inspired by. The general form and characteristics of the spaceship should be inspirational – and building the first generation of USS Enterprise would surely be inspirational.

It’s true. The project would be inspirational, but the funding for this thing seems rather unlikely. According to the site, it will cost $50 billion over the next 20 years to construct this version of the Enterprise. Fortunately, our unnamed Trekkie already worked out how to find this money, with only minor tax increases and barely noticeable spending cuts to programs that are far less awesome than building Gene Roddenberry’s iconic spaceship.

Once we’ve built one of these ships, the site claims, we could the continue building an entire fleet, with new ships rolling off the line every three years. Thanks to the constant technological progress, each ship would be more advanced than the last while costing the same amount of cash. By the time we reach the 23rd century setting of the classic TV show, we should be able to field a ship far more capable than the one Captain Kirk commanded.

In the meantime, the site’s creator believes our fleet of ships could ferry us to Mars in as little as 90 days, while offering a comfortable 1g of on-board gravity and providing housing and workspaces for hundreds of explorers, scientists or especially adventurous, wealthy tourists.

Yes, we realize how it sounds, but before you roll your eyes at the idea, take a look at the website. If nothing else, it should provide you a few hours of entertainment while you pore over the man’s intensely detailed ship concept and ideas on how exactly to make this bird fly. If nothing else, it’s a better Trek fix than re-watching old seasons of Enterprise.

Earnest Cavalli
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Earnest Cavalli has been writing about games, tech and digital culture since 2005 for outlets including Wired, Joystiq…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more