Skip to main content

AMD’s new Ryzen AI 300 chips look like the real deal

AMD announcing its Ryzen AI CPUs at Computex 2024.
AMD

The pressure is on at Computex this year. With the May announcement of Copilot+ PCs and Microsoft’s deep partnership with Qualcomm, the stakes were high for AMD coming into the show. But the company certainly didn’t show up empty-handed.

Its announcements have all centered around Zen 5, the company’s latest architecture, both on desktop and mobile. But at the moment, these mobile chips feels especially noteworthy in light of Copilot+. AMD calls it the Ryzen AI 300 series. It’s a complete rebrand for AMD, not unlike Intel’s move to “Core Ultra” in its most recent generation. But this time, it’s all about AI.

Recommended Videos

The new mobile CPUs promise to deliver huge performance uplifts that will help them compete against Intel, Apple, and Qualcomm. The two chips that fall under the new branding are the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Ryzen AI 9 365. Both processors appear to be very similar, and they both mark a major upgrade over AMD’s previous ventures into the world of AI.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 365
Cores/threads 12/24 10/20
Frequency 5.1GHz 5.0GHz
Combined cache 36MB 34MB
NPU 50 TOPs 50 TOPs
GPU Radeon 890M Radeon 880M

The XDNA 2 neural processing unit (NPU) performance went up from 16 tera operations per second (TOPS) to 50 TOPS, enabling the chips to perform tasks such as running generative AI models locally. Reaching 50 TOPS on the NPU is a big deal for AMD. It needed a minimum of 40 TOPs to meet the requirements for Copilot+ experiences like Recall, but it went beyond that, beating the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite and potentially surpassing Intel’s upcoming Lunar Lake.

Aside from the vastly improved NPU, AMD is also serving up more GPU power with up to 16 compute units (CUs), which is comparable to a desktop RX 6500 XT.

AMD CEO Lisa Su presenting performance for Ryzen AI CPUs.
AMD

What do these improvements mean in terms of performance? AMD promises to deliver a vast improvement in AI responsiveness. When tested on the Llama-2 7(B) large language model, the Ryzen 9 HX 370 proved to be up to five times faster than the Ryzen 9 8940HS. It also did a good job when stacked up against Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite, winning by an impressive 60% in the 3DMark Night Raid Graphics test, 30% in Cinebench 24 nT, and 10% in Procyon Office. Productivity gets a boost, too, with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scoring a huge win in Blender, beating the Apple M3 by 98% and the Intel Core Ultra 185H by 73%.

AMD also shared some gaming benchmarks, once again comparing to the Core Ultra 185H, and it’s good news all around for AMD. The lowest lead it scored was 128% in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and the biggest was 147% in Cyberpunk 2077.

AMD's CEO presenting the chip for Ryzen AI.
AMD

The new Ryzen AI chips will eventually find homes in over 100 Windows Copilot+ laptops starting in July. Some of AMD’s partners include Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and MSI, and it’s not all just workstations like the Asus Zenbook S or the Asus Vivobook S — although those are coming too. Some of these laptops fill the gap in the lineup of more powerful Copilot+ PCs with discrete GPUs, such as the Asus ProArt P16.

AMD even teased that the upcoming processors will appear in some of the best gaming laptops, such as the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 or the MSI Stealth A16 AI+.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
This new patch improves Ryzen 9000 latency by over 50%
The Ryzen 9 9950X socketed in a motherboard.

A new BIOS update brings a much-needed fix for some of AMD's best processors. Since the launch of Ryzen 9000 over a month ago, some users and reviewers alike noticed that the core-to-core latency on these CPUs was significantly higher than on the last-gen Ryzen 7000. Trying new firmware proves that AMD addressed this issue, reducing latency by over 50% in some cases.

The problems affect inter-CCD (core complex die) latency, which refers to how quickly instructions can be transferred between two CCDs. CPUs that have more than one CCD, such as the Ryzen 9 9950X or the Ryzen 9 9900X, were suffering from really high inter-CCD latencies that were twice as high as those on their Ryzen 7000 counterparts. The latency sometimes surpassed 200 nanoseconds when data was being sent from one CCD to another.

Read more
AMD’s new CPU could silently replace the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D CPU.

AMD just expanded its lineup of gaming CPUs, but it's not a Zen 5 chip. Instead, AMD launched a new Zen 4 CPU, the Ryzen 5 7600X3D. Once again a Micro Center exclusive, the CPU could be an interesting budget offering ... if not for the fact that it still costs a pretty penny. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D seems to be disappearing from the market. What's going on?

The fact that AMD revisited the Zen 4 lineup is not surprising, as it still continues to release Zen 3 chips. It's also not shocking that the Ryzen 5 7600X3D is a Micro Center exclusive, as the Ryzen 5 5600X3D was also only available at that one retailer. In the case of the 7600X3D, though, it'll also be available in Germany through Mindfactory.

Read more
Your AMD Ryzen CPU is about 10% slower than it should be
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X installed in a motherboard.

AMD's Zen 5 CPUs haven't been able to impress in gaming, showing only small generational improvements -- but there are still some free frame rates to be won here. According to a comprehensive set of gaming benchmarks, a new Windows Update might be all that it takes to improve the performance of AMD's best processors, and this includes Zen 4 CPUs, too.

Earlier this month, Hardware Unboxed revealed that AMD's latest CPUs might be missing out on some frames per second (fps) in games due to a Windows bug. Switching to an Admin account (which is a little harder than it seems to be) fixed the problem, boosting both Zen 4 and Zen 5 CPUs by a considerable amount. AMD also hinted that this might be the issue behind Zen 5's lackluster performance, although it also blamed other factors, such as using different test suites or not running on Admin mode.

Read more