Skip to main content

Gamers are flocking to return Intel CPUs — and some are permanently damaged

A hand holds the Intel Core i9-12900KS.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Intel’s troubles with instability on 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs continues to escalate, and a new report suggests that gamers are returning these CPUs at a much higher rate than retailers expect. An anonymous European retailer says they’ve seen four times as many returns for 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs compared to 12th-gen, according to a report from French outlet Les Numeriques.

Returns have only ramped up recently, however. The retailer says that in the six months following the release of all three generations, the return rates are nearly identical. Looking at the rate now, however, 13th-gen CPUs are being returned four times as often as 12th-gen, while 14th-gen CPUs are being return three times as much. Given what we’ve learned about Intel’s instability issue, this suggests that the processors do, indeed, degrade over time.

The outlet speculates the return rate is somewhere around 5%, while most CPUs only get up to around a 1% return rate. Even that is a low estimate, as the outlet points out, considering there’s some percentage of processors that receive service directly from Intel. According to a report from Level1Techs, the number of affected processors could be as low as 10% and as a high as 50%.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

In addition, some number of these processors are damaged beyond repair, according to the retailer. Intel has pinned the blame of its instability problem on elevated voltage requests within the microcode of the processor. However, we’ve since learned that a manufacturing error is also causing issues, and leaked internal communications suggest there could be even more factors at play.

Intel has committed to release a microcode update in mid-August that will address the elevated voltages, but it might not fix every processor. According to the retailer, the processors that are permanently damaged won’t be fixed by the microcode update. It’s possible that some processors impacted by Intel’s manufacturing error are still in circulation as well, which also wouldn’t be fixed by the microcode update.

Although Intel has finally broken its silence in addressing the instability problem facing its CPUs — which has grown over the course of several months — we still don’t have a concrete answer if the microcode update will fix the widespread issue.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
No one is buying AMD’s new Zen 5 CPUs, and it’s painfully obvious why
The Ryzen 9 9900X sitting on its box.

AMD's new Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X, which were aimed at claiming a spot among the best processors, are off to a rocky start. According to early sales numbers from German retailer Mindfactory, the number of new AMD CPUs the website has shipped is only in the double digits, despite being on the market for nearly a week.

Mindfactory is only one retailer, but it actually displays the number of products it sold on its website. The Ryzen 5 9600X has seen over 20 sales, while the Ryzen 7 9700X has had over 30. You can see the lack of enthusiasm for Zen 5 CPUs elsewhere, though. On Amazon's bestsellers page, the last-gen Ryzen 7 7800X3D ranks in the first spot. The first Zen 5 CPU on the list, the Ryzen 7 9700X, is in 47th place.

Read more
Millions of AMD chips are being ignored in major security flaw fix
CPU pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X.

Hundreds of millions of AMD CPUs are facing a new vulnerability called Sinkhole. The exploit, which was first reported by Wired, impacts processors dating back to 2006, and it spans nearly all of AMD's products. That list includes Ryzen, Threadripper, and Epyc CPUs across desktop and mobile, as well as AMD's data center GPUs. Despite Sinkhole hitting some of AMD's best processors, only the most recent batch of chips will receive a patch that fixes the vulnerability.

AMD isn't patching Ryzen 1000, 2000, or 3000 processors, nor is it patching Threadripper 1000 and 2000 CPUs, reports Tom's Hardware. The company claims that these older CPUs fall outside of its support window, despite the fact that millions are still in use. Still, even the most recent Ryzen 3000 chips were released over five years ago, and it makes sense that AMD would want to focus its support on new chips like the Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X.

Read more
Intel’s downfall hurts everyone
intel downfall hurts everyone dt respec

Intel can't catch a break. The instability saga we've witnessed over the past few months, along with a historically disastrous earnings report for the company, has led Intel into some pretty bleak territory. The company even postponed its Innovation event this year; meanwhile, shareholders are filing a lawsuit against Team Blue. No matter how you slice it, Intel is having a bad time right now.

There's a lot of understandable anger pointed Intel's way right now, from game developers saying they're going to lose money, to gamers who say they've been denied returns, to shareholders that claim Intel fraudulently hid how bad things were. Those are all legitimate things to be frustrated about, and I understand the satisfaction you might feel when a company gets what it deserves.

Read more