Skip to main content

‘Passive sharing’ clogs the arteries of social networks, but is it too late for a bypass?

social media overload passive sharingSocial media can be a great way to keep in touch with friends, find out what’s going on in the world, or just catch up with the latest memes. It can also be a hellish stream of drivel which reminds you of a roomful of people all competing to see who can shout the loudest and completely ignoring everyone else. People have always made jokes about the pointless nature of much of what is shared on social media, and there’s some kernel of truth there. I don’t care what anyone had for lunch, unless you ate a monster truck and you have a video of yourself doing it.

The thing is, most people know better than to share inanities nowadays. We are becoming more sophisticated in our use of it and social media can actually be a powerful outlet sometimes, a cultural conduit on the world. Sadly, despite a certain maturing of our social-media habits, our streams remain clogged with unwelcome entries. The problem of feeds full of irrelevant nonsense is fast becoming much, much worse and it’s all thanks to spam advertising by the back door, otherwise known as passive sharing.

Recommended Videos

Passive sharing has gone too far. It’s time we rose up and demanded less spam in our social media. Who’s with me?

What is passive sharing?

You’re passively sharing on social networks whenever some information about your life is broadcast out to friends without any initiation on your behalf. For instance, configuring Spotify to share what you’re listening to at any given moment is passive sharing.

You could look at passive sharing a number of ways. Passive sharing is narcissistic commentary for egomaniacs who are too lazy to post their own status updates. Passive sharing is the automation of completely pointless information. Passive sharing is a cheap form of targeted advertising. Passive sharing is a wonderful way to get recommendations on great new things to read and buy from the people who really matter to you.

Personally, I think it’s a mixture of three of those statements. I’ll let you guess which ones.

Is passive sharing always bad?

Yes. If you can think of a situation when it isn’t, then please post a comment. I understand the potential utility of finding out what my friends and family are doing, or what they like, but if they can’t be bothered to share it themselves, then it doesn’t look like a resounding recommend to me. The trouble is what we’re really talking about here is a running commentary on what they are doing. The fact they listened to this song, completed this achievement in a game, or read an article on something does not tell me what they thought about it.

The first time I can really remember seeing passive sharing was in MSN Messenger when it would tell me what songs my contacts were listening to. I guess BBM (BlackBerry Messenger) would do it with involuntary read receipts, so whoever just sent you a message would know if you had read it. That read receipt has been rolled out into most messengers now, and it’s arguably the most useful application of passive sharing that I’ve ever seen, but I still hate it. I’d gladly stay in the dark about whether someone has read the last message I sent yet, than feel compelled to quickly reply to messages I receive because the sender knows I already read them.

Advertising spam

Apps on all sorts of platforms now want permission to plug into your existing social media accounts, and the problem of passive sharing has exploded. All of these apps are just looking for opportunities to advertise their wares.

amazon passive sharing social mediaIt’s like that screen you get when you buy anything on Amazon now that says – “I just bought: ‘Sewing Machine Oil’” and gives you the option to share with Facebook, Twitter or by email (I used it to quiet down a computer fan, in case you’re wondering). At least this prompt gives you the chance to think “No one wants to know what I just bought on Amazon” and choose not to share it.

Passive sharing in most apps is turned on by default. They ask for permission to access your Facebook account, Twitter profile, or whatever else, when you first install them. Some apps can’t even be used without a Facebook account. When you accept this and give the app access, it starts broadcasting your actions to your friends and contacts.

Who wants this?

Who does this serve? Do you want people to know what you just read, what you are listening to, what you just bought, that your farm needs more goats, or you just slayed a troll? Even if you do want to share some things, surely you don’t want to share everything? Wouldn’t you prefer to be able to choose?

Think of all the people on the other end. How many of your Facebook friends are interested in your reading habits, or how you just awarded someone +K in knitting on Klout, or beat Aunt Bessie at SongPop? I’m going to hazard a guess at “none.”

The truth is, only app developers and publishers see any benefit from passive sharing, because they are using you to get to your loved ones, friends, and even casual acquaintances. They are using you to broadcast ads for free. The result is timelines and streams that are full of junk we don’t want to read. The social media experience is genuinely degraded by passive sharing. I used to get curated information from my friends, now I get automated dross.

Why does social media allow it?

This is the big question. If social media sites and services want to make money from advertising, and Facebook definitely does, then why allow advertising spam to sneak into our feeds when they don’t earn on it? If they won’t kill passive sharing because users don’t like it, then maybe they’ll kill it because it dilutes their potential to sell advertising.

Perhaps platforms like Facebook are now realizing that the easy integration that has made their brands ubiquitous is a double-edged sword. Is there an easy way to get it back under control now that the horse has bolted? Maybe. Put it this way – if they offered a tick box tomorrow that allowed you to turn off all passive sharing, outgoing and incoming, how many of you would tick it?

Simon Hill
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Simon Hill is an experienced technology journalist and editor who loves all things tech. He is currently the Associate Mobile…
LG’s new Gram Pro finally looks like a serious MacBook Pro rival
An LG Gram laptop on a table.

Just ahead of CES, LG has announced a refresh to its Gram Pro lineup, as well as launched a budget-friendly Gram Book. The tweaked Gram Pro laptops are the most exciting, though, with the the LG Gram Pro 17 catching my eye.

First off, it's been thinned out a bit, dropping down to 0.62 inches thick, which is almost the same thickness as the 16-inch MacBook Pro. The LG Gram Pro 17 is also a full pound and a half lighter than the MacBook Pro, both of which are striving to be one of the best laptops you can buy.

Read more
Nvidia’s new GPUs show up in prebuilts, but the RTX 5090 is missing
iBUYPOWER RTX for AI PCs side view of pre-built on sale hero

Nvidia's upcoming RTX 5080 and RTX 5070 Ti just appeared in several iBUYPOWER gaming PCs. This is the first U.S. retailer to list Nvidia's RTX 50-series in prebuilt systems. The listings are interesting, with performance figures that really don't add up. Still, the biggest question is: Where's the GPU that's bound to beat all the current best graphics cards? Yes, we're talking about RTX 5090.

The listings have already been taken down, but they were preserved by VideoCardz. A total of five systems were listed by iBUYPOWER, but they all contained the same two GPUs -- either the RTX 5080 or the RTX 5070 Ti. Both cards are said to come with 16GB of memory, and we expect them to be announced on January 6 during the CES 2025 keynote held by Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang.

Read more
OLED gaming monitors are about to get a lot brighter
Path of Exile 2 running on an Asus gaming monitor.

One of the biggest criticisms leveled against OLED monitors, despite being some of the best gaming monitors you can buy, is how dim they are. Although brightness is steadily increasing, it looks like the next crop of OLED gaming monitors will make quite the leap when it comes to HDR performance. Ahead of CES 2025, VESA has revealed a new tier of its DisplayHDR standard that's focused squarely on the brightness of OLED monitors.

The certification is DisplayHDR True Black 1,000. Most OLED gaming monitors, such as the MSI MPG 321URX or Alienware 27 QD-OLED, are certified with DisplayHDR True Black 400. This certification level is reserved for OLED -- or extremely high-end mini-LED -- displays that achieve nearly perfect black levels. According to VESA's specifications, the display has to reach 0.0005 nits with a checkboard pattern. Now, VESA is focusing on the other end of the spectrum, adding a more demanding tier that maintains those low black levels while pushing brightness higher.

Read more