Skip to main content

Do EV tax incentives actually work? ‘Energy Policy’ article suggests they don’t

Just plug in that EV anywhere Nissan Leaf
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s no denying: 2013 was a good year for plug-in hybrids and EVs, with both categories showing startling jumps in purchase numbers. This is no doubt due to many factors, but some might suggest that federal and state tax credits have helped to build interest in cars that are otherwise too expensive.

However, the authors of recent article “Increasing electric vehicle policy efficiency and effectiveness by reducing mainstream market bias”, by Energy Policy, aren’t among them.

Recommended Videos

The snappily titled article suggests that these incentives are inefficient and actually harming the long-term adoption of EVs and other energy friendly vehicles. The basic point of the article is that focus on mainstream consumers is misplaced, and that the incentives to not effectively change the decisions of consumers.

In essence, the people who would buy EVs would do so regardless of the incentive, and people who aren’t yet ready to make the switch aren’t enticed by the tax credit. The result is that taxpayers subsidize people who already would have bought an EV.

The authors of the article go on to suggest that we focus on providing incentives to niche markets like taxis, ride sharing companies, and fleet vehicles. Groups purchasing vehicles for these applications can be the subject of more direct subsidies, and individual incentives make a broader impact.

There is another benefit to this method of incentivizing the transition to EVs; as we covered a while back, there are many parts of the country where EVs offer little or no environmental benefit when compared to conventional vehicles. In areas where coal and fossil fuels dominate the energy grid, an EV’s carbon footprint can actually be larger than an efficient gas or diesel powered vehicle.

When you incentive consumers everywhere to make the switch, you may not actually be deriving an environmental benefit. If we follow the path of the authors of this article, individual segments and geographic regions where EVs make the most sense can be targeted.

Whether you agree with the article or not, it raises good questions about how we choose to promote efficient and environmental cars as they become more prevalent. 

Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more