Intel Ships Dual-Core Atom 330

By Geoff Duncan Published September 22, 2008

Intel Ships Dual-Core Atom 330

Chipmaker Intel has officially begun shipping its dual-core Atom 330 processor, aiming to bring more horsepower to the netbook and nettop market while keeping within the Atom’s low-power footprint.

The new Atom 330 offers 1 MB of L2 cache (512 Kb for each core), supports DDR2 667 memory, and is designed for the Intel 945GC Express chipset, which features Intel GMA 950 graphics and Intel High Definition Audio. The unit is rated for 8 Watts of thermal design power, and is clocked at the same speed as its Atom 230 predecessor: 1.6 GHz.

Recommended Videos

It remains to be seen whether netbook and nettop developers will leverage the new resources in the Atom 330; while having a dual-core CPU could render some significant performance improvements, the bottom line is that it’s only an on-paper improvement unless software taps into the multi-core design…and on the low-end netbook market, developers haven’t yet shown a lot of willingness to put sweat and elbow grease into their applications. Also, the Atom 330’s design means system builders will still have to deal with having just one DIMM slot and one PCI slot, with no capability for DVI video output. However, the price may be right: Intel is charging $43 each for Atom 330s in lots of 1,000, while the Atom 230 runs $29.

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

I tested Intel’s Core i5-14600K against its cheaper sibling. Don’t waste your money

Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

Intel's new Core i5-14600K isn't a massive generational leap, as you can read in our Core i5-14600K review. No one expected it to be with Intel's 13th-gen CPUs already sitting among the best processors. The bigger question is if it's worth buying over last-gen's Core i5-13600K considering that both are readily available for around the same price.

I've tested both chips extensively across a range of productivity and gaming scenarios. The Core i5-14600K brings some minor improvements over its last-gen counterpart, but those looking to stretch their dollar the furthest are better off sticking with the Core i5-13600K.
Pricing and availability
An Intel 13th-generation 13600K Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Computing

I tested the Intel Core i9-14900K against the Core i9-13900K, and it’s not pretty

Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's new Core i9-14900K is a tough processor to evaluate. It brings the same number of cores and the same architecture as last-gen's Core i9-13900K, but Intel asserts that the new chip delivers some performance improvements. Is that true, and is it worth ditching last-gen's flagship for what Intel claims is its best processor?

The Core i9-14900K fixes some of the weaker areas of the Core i9-13900K. However, as you can read in our Intel Core i9-14900K review, the new processor does very little to justify spending a higher price for largely the same performance.
Pricing and availability

Computing

The Intel Core i5-14600K can’t take back the gaming crown from AMD

Intel Core i5-14600K processor inside its socket.

AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D has been the undisputed best gaming processor ever since it came out. Thanks to the power of AMD's 3D V-Cache, this CPU breezes through most games, but may not be the best option for productivity.

Intel, on the other hand, makes well-rounded chips, but can the new Core i5-14600K keep up with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D? We've tested both of those processors, and we're here to share some in-depth benchmarks to help you make your decision.
Pricing and availability