Skip to main content

AI research: Google teams up with leading experts at Oxford University

ai research google teams up with leading experts at oxford university deepmind artificial intelligence 2 970x0
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Google on Thursday announced a partnership with Oxford University to collaborate on artificial intelligence (AI) research in the areas of natural language understanding and image recognition.

The announcement was made in a blog post by Google’s VP of engineering, Demis Hassabis, who also happens to be co-founder of DeepMind, the AI startup Google acquired at the beginning of the year for an estimated $400 million.

Recommended Videos

Hassabis wrote in the post that the Mountain View company will be working with two AI research startups – Dark Blue Labs and Vision Factory – founded by a total of seven research specialists, several of whom are based at the university.

Dark Blue, which comprises “four world leading experts in the use of deep learning for natural language understanding,” will lead efforts to research and enhance voice recognition technology.

Meanwhile, Vision Factory, whose team includes one of the world’s leading experts on computer vision systems, will continue their work developing visual recognition technology using deep learning, which is essentially about teaching machines to process and comprehend information in a way similar to humans.

The DeepMind co-founder said that the collaboration will involve Google making a sizable contribution for the establishment of a research partnership with the Computer Science Department and the Engineering Department at Oxford University, “which will include a program of student internships and a series of joint lectures and workshops to share knowledge and expertise.”

Before Google acquired DeepMind, the London-based startup had received funding from several high-profile tech entrepreneurs and investors, enabling it to launch applications connected with simulations, e-commerce, and games.

While Google hasn’t revealed any specific plans for its ongoing AI research, it seems it’ll be tied in with the slew of robotics-linked startup acquisitions it’s been making in recent years as it seeks to push forward in this fast-developing field.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more