Two sisters find their long-lost brother via viral Facebook post

By Jose Alvarez May 13, 2015

two sisters find their long lost brother via viral facebook post findrobertbarwick — KCTV 5 Kansas City

They haven’t been face to face in 60 years … and then they Facebooked.

Two sisters were able to find their brother after six long decades when a Facebook post went viral, KCTV 5 Kansas City reported. The sisters — Linda McCloskey and Betty Jean Musselman — posted a picture on Facebook that quickly went viral and drew the attention of forensic historian Michael Jeffcoat, who saw the picture on the social-networking site. He wasn’t alone: It received 250,000 shares in only three days.

Recommended Videos

McCloskey and Musselman were separated from their brother 60 years ago when their parents could no longer care for them. Their brother, John Barwick, was sent to a school for the deaf and blind, as he had a hearing disability. The sisters had trouble finding Barwick because his first and last names are common in the South, KCTV said. The historian was nonetheless hopeful.

“The last time I saw you, I was hugging you. Now I’m hugging you again.”

“I just had a sense there could be a resolution,” Jeffcoat said. He teamed up with private investigator Jill Ward, and within three days, Jeffcoat and Ward were able to find Barwick in West Palm Beach, Florida. Local authorities in West Palm Beach located the man, who was in shock — unaware that his family had been looking for him.

“The first time I hugged him, I said ‘the last time I saw you, I was hugging you. Now I’m hugging you again’,” McCloskey said. “It was just magnificent, he’s such a wonderful man.” Barwick, McCloskey, Musselman, and Amy Sciotti, McCloskey’s daughter, went to the beach to make up for lost time.

Thanks to social media, the three siblings were reunited again. The sisters even set up a GoFundMe account to buy Barwick a new home, as he has been living in a trailer for the past 20 years.

Topics

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Introduced to tech at a young age, Jose has grown attached to video games in particular. He has covered topics such as…

News

Facebook’s long-promised Supreme Court for content won’t be here for a long time

Facebook Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before the House Financial Services Committee on "An Examination of Facebook and Its Impact on the Financial Services and Housing Sectors" in the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, DC on October 23, 2019.

The Facebook Oversight Board that can overrule CEO Mark Zuckerberg is taking longer than expected, and its inauguration is being pushed back, based on a blog post the social media giant published on Tuesday, December 10.

The Oversight Board was expected to begin deliberating early next year, according to previous reports. However, a new post says the company has put $130 million into the board and is still working to source and review candidates as part of its selection process.

News

Facebook will protect your data — as long as no one’s paying them for it

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaking on a panel at the Paley Center for Media

At a Capitol Hill hearing Tuesday — no, not the one with the impeachment and such — Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) asked Jay Sullivan, Facebook’s product management director for privacy and integrity in Messenger, whether Facebook collected any data from its Messenger Kids app. It was the exact same question, Durbin said, that he had posed to Mark Zuckerberg last year, when he received an answer he deemed unsatisfactory.

“I have significant concerns that the data gathered by this app might be used or sold,” Durbin told Sullivan. “[Zuckerberg] responded, ‘in general, that data is not going to be shared with third parties.’ I said his use of that terms was ‘provocative and worrisome.'” Durbin then asked Sullivan the same question. “Is your answer that there is no information collected via Messenger Kids that is shared by Facebook to any third parties?”

Social Media

I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.