Skip to main content

Justice Department probes major theater chains for antitrust violations

justice department investigates major theater chains for antitrust violations digital movie
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Ever wonder why it’s hard to find those big summer blockbusters at your local indie movie chain? The cause, at least in part, is thanks to what the industry calls “clearance agreements,” which ensure exclusive studio releases to major theater chains. The practice is now under investigation by the Justice Department, which is looking into the nation’s three largest theater chains, Regal, AMC Entertainment, and Cinemark, to see if they’ve violated anti-trust laws.

Reported by Deadline, AMC Entertainment, and Regal both announced that they received a Civil Investigation Demand from the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division last Thursday, and AMC also revealed it received notice from the Ohio Attorney General on Friday.

Recommended Videos

According to the report, each company must comply with “the production of documents and answers to interrogatories concerning potentially anticompetitive conduct, including film clearances and participation in certain joint ventures.” In other words, the Justice Department believes clearance agreements may be in violation of antitrust regulations, allowing the majors to hold an unfair advantage over the competition.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

In a statement, Regal today claimed that it “does not believe that the DOJ or state investigations will produce evidence the Company has engaged in any anticompetitive conduct in violation of Federal or state antitrust of competition laws,” but also added that it could provide “no assurances as to the scope, timing, or outcome” of the probe.

For its part, AMC Entertainment toed the same line, claiming it is “cooperating with the relevant governmental authorities,” but couldn’t predict the “scope, duration, or outcome of these investigations.”

Smaller theater chains have been crying foul for years over clearance agreements which they claim harm the consumer by limiting choice, as well as creating an unfair marketplace in which the larger chains are able to muscle smaller outlets out of the movie business altogether.

The Wall Street Journal reported in April that the Justice Department was stepping up its investigation, and we’re now seeing the results of those actions in definitive probes seeking to find out if, indeed, the big three have engaged in unfair, or unlawful practices to keep the smaller chains out of the loop.

Ryan Waniata
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Waniata is a multi-year veteran of the digital media industry, a lover of all things tech, audio, and TV, and a…
The Flash director says the film failed because people ‘don’t care’ about the DC hero
Barry Allen runs through the Speed Force in The Flash.

It's been nearly two years since The Flash hit theaters in 2023, and the film remains one of the most infamous bombs in recent comic book movie history. Its director, Andy Muschietti, isn't confused about why the film failed, though. During an interview on Radio Tu’s La Baulera del Coso, Muschietti said that he believes The Flash performed so poorly because it wasn't as widely appealing as everyone, including himself and its producers at Warner Bros. Pictures, hoped it would be.

"The Flash failed, among all the other reasons, because it wasn’t a movie that appealed to all four quadrants. It failed at that,” Muschietti argued. “When you spend $200 million making a movie, [Warner Bros.] wants you to bring even your grandmother to the theaters.”

Read more
Sebastian Stan says Thunderbolts is Marvel’s Breakfast Club
Bucky Barnes stands in the desert in Marvel's Thunderbolts.

Marvel Studios may have released only one film last year, but it has three theatrical titles coming in 2025. The movies in question -- February's Captain America: Brave New World, May's Thunderbolts*, and July's The Fantastic Four: First Steps -- all promise to move the Marvel Cinematic Universe's Multiverse Saga forward in their own unique ways. The three also seem very different from each other. Brave New World, for instance, is being marketed as a paranoid political thriller, while Fantastic Four has seemingly adopted a retro-futuristic, '60s-inspired aesthetic.

As for Thunderbolts*, one of the film's stars says that it has more in common with a classic 1980s coming-of-age dramedy than comic book fans may expect. "Thunderbolts* is really interesting because it was so fun, man," Sebastian Stan, who is set to make his MCU return as Bucky Barnes in the forthcoming film, revealed during his recent appearance on Variety's Awards Circuit Podcast. "I'm curious to see how people are going to respond [to it] because the closest [film] that comes [to mind] is that movie The Breakfast Club."

Read more
5 years ago, this sci-fi Alien rip-off drowned at the box office. Is it worthy of reappraisal?
The aqua suits in the movie Underwater

Five years ago in January 2020, just as the COVID-19 pandemic started to make its first headlines, a different kind of disaster arrived in movie theaters: Underwater. The movie starred Kristen Stewart, and based on the trailers, it looked to pay homage to older sci-fi horror classics. Yet Underwater turned out to be a super clunky, visually murky, and ill-paced film about a deep-sea mining station at the bottom of the Mariana Trench that inadvertently wakes up a giant deep-sea monster.

In theory, Underwater should have been enjoyable. Even if it added nothing to the genre and was just a poor homage to Alien, Cloverfield, and The Abyss, it should have been at least derivative fun. But it wasn't, and audiences stayed away from the big-budget film. So what went wrong, and is Underwater worth watching five years later now that it's available to stream at home?
Why Underwater is a Cthulhu-sized disaster
Underwater | Official Trailer [HD] | 20th Century FOX

Read more