Skip to main content

U.S. officials get tough on hoverboards, seize more than 16,000 counterfeit units

nyc subway hoverboard ban
Ben Larcey/Creative Commons
The U.S. authorities are getting tough on hoverboards, with the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency on Wednesday announcing it’d seized a record number of the self-balancing scooters for posing a serious health and safety risk.

Officers in Chicago confiscated 16,000 counterfeit boards worth an estimated $6 million in the raid, though the number is expected to run much higher due to the huge number of shipments still being processed.

Recommended Videos

The seized devices, many of which reportedly came from China, bear fake trademark logos and also contain batteries that fail to meet U.S. safety standards.

The hoverboard, which despite its name doesn’t really hover at all but instead uses wheels to move, was one of the holiday season’s biggest sellers. However, reports from around the world of sudden fires caused by dodgy lithium-ion batteries inside sub-standard models prompted many concerned retailers to pull the device from sale. Airlines, too, banned the board from flights.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) said recently it’d so far received reports of 39 hoverboard fires in 19 states.

An indication of just how serious the situation has become came last week when CPSC Chairman Elliot F. Kaye recommended hoverboard owners to keep a fire extinguisher with their machine at all times.

In its report outlining an ongoing investigation into the blazing boards, the commission said that many of the fires “occurred indoors and could have resulted in serious injuries if not for the quick actions of consumers to extinguish the fire.”

Commenting on the recent raid in Chicago, William Ferrara, CBP’s director of field operations, said, “Not only are these hoverboards a serious safety hazard but they also threaten our economic security by hurting legitimate businesses who invest significant amounts of resources into the development and protection of their brands.”

Reputable makers of the board will be desperately hoping the bad publicity soon fades away as counterfeit devices are gradually removed from the market, though it’s clearly going to take time for cautious consumers to be convinced of the product’s safety.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more