Skip to main content

Are Sofia and Broxton just the first casualties in an Intel Atom cull?

intel apollo lake cpus pentium celeron launched intelhq
Shutterstock
Intel seems to be killing off its low-cost Atom chip family, the processors used in a host of smartphones, tablets, and other small form factor devices. The strategy is likely intended to allow the manufacturer to concentrate its interests on other, more lucrative areas of its output.

The Atom chips code-named Sofia and Broxton are to be cancelled with immediate effect, according to a report from PC World. Sofia processors had already begun shipping, while delays had forced the Broxton chip to miss its scheduled 2016 launch date.

Recommended Videos

The culling of the Atom line is the first major element of Intel’s plan to reshuffle after the company announced an 11-percent cut to its work force, as reported by CNN. Shifting focus to products that offer a better return on investment is a smart choice, but it’s perhaps at the cost of groundwork laid in previous years.

Intel bet big on its smartphone and tablet interests, investing billions into Atom, but ultimately the company couldn’t compete with rival ARM. There have been calls for Intel to discontinue the Atom line before today, owing to the poor performance that the processor delivered in order to achieve its budget-friendly price tag.

It’s likely that the company will now attempt to push its Core M processors in place of Atom chips. Those parts offer up more power and better performance, but that would in turn be reflected in their pricing.

The resources freed up by Intel’s termination of the Sofia and Broxton chips will likely help bolster the company’s efforts to get in on the ground floor with 5G components. 5G networks are expected to become the norm over the next few years, which could be a huge boon for a company able to supply the necessary chips and modems.

Brad Jones
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Not this again: Intel Arrow Lake may have instability issues
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's Arrow Lake is just a couple of days from hitting the market, and we've been inundated with various reports and leaked benchmarks. Today's news doesn't sound good, though. YouTuber Moore's Law Is Dead reports that Arrow Lake, also referred to as Core Ultra 200-S, may have some instability issues -- much like what we've seen Intel battle for months on end with Raptor Lake.

Before we dive in, keep in mind that all of this is yet to be confirmed, and we're mere days away from finding out whether it's true or not. However, it could give some buyers a reason to hold off and read the reviews before preordering the CPUs. Moore's Law Is Dead talked about various reviewers and tech YouTubers who had something bad to say about Arrow Lake's stability. The issues are twofold: A wild discrepancy between benchmarks, and running into crashes.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips may have a secret weapon
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

An upcoming Intel graphics solution, namely the Intel Arc 140T, has recently been spotted on GFXBench. The most interesting bit is that it offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Xe2-based Arc 140V iGPU that recently made its appearance on Intel’s latest Lunar Lake mobile CPUs.

A post by X (formerly Twitter) user Michael (@miktdt) compares GFXbench scores of the Arc 140T with two Arc 140V SKUs—one with 16GB memory and the other with 8GB. The 8GB Arc 140V reached 6,613 frames with an average of 106.7 framers per second (fps), while the 16GB version achieved 6,839 frames at 110.3 fps. However, the Intel Arc 140T, equipped with 16GB of memory, excelled with 11,056 frames at an average of 178.3 fps, surpassing the 16GB Arc 140V by 62%, despite both GPUs sharing eight Xe cores.

Read more
Intel’s new Arrow Lake CPUs can still consume a ton of power
Pins on Core i9-12900K.

Intel has made a big deal about the efficiency of its upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs, which are looking to earn a spot among the best processors when they release later this week. Some early benchmark results HXL on X (formerly Twitter) show that the CPUs can still draw a ton of power if you stray from Intel's default power settings, however.

The post, which you can see below, shows the Core Ultra 9 285K peaking at 370 watts of power draw in Cinebench R23's multi-core test. The CPU itself is blacked-out, but you can tell it's the Core Ultra 9 285K from the 24 cores picked up by Cinebench. The Core Ultra 9 285K has a maximum turbo power of 250W, according to Intel, and a base power of 125W.

Read more