Skip to main content

You thought your Wi-Fi was bad? Threatening hot spot delays flight for two hours

An airplane coming into land.
A Quantas flight was delayed two hours while crew searched for a wifi hotspot called Mobile Detonation Device welcomia/123rf
If you were looking for a place to connect to Wi-Fi and saw a hot spot called “Mobile Detonation Device,” how would you feel? Freaked? Well, that’s the justified reaction a woman had when she checked for a wireless connection on a plane about to take off from Melbourne, Australia, this weekend, according to a report in The West Australian.

When the passenger saw the Wi-Fi access point name she alerted the crew. That’s when the flight’s plans changed. First, according to passenger John Vidler, the captain announced a delay. “He said there was a device on the plane that had a name on it that he found threatening and that we were not leaving until that device was brought to him,” according Vidler. Then they waited for someone to come forward while the crew and security personnel searched the plane.

Recommended Videos

When no device was located or brought forth, security and Quantas cleared the plane for take off, and the flight eventually landed in Perth two hours behind its originally scheduled arrival time. According to Vidler, he and 40 others decided they were not taking that flight and deplaned.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

There was no mention of authorities demanding to see and inspect every hot-spot-capable device among passengers and crew. The device could have been on or off the plane.

Assigning one’s phone, tablet, or portable computer with such an ominous name, particularly on a device set up to be found and accessed by others, is of questionable taste. Like on the “What were you thinking?” level.

Carrying that device to an airport, let alone possibly on a plane with the hot spot enabled, is unquestionably stupid, potentially dangerous, and, in this case, capable of disrupting the day for a lot of people. It’s just a shame the prankster was able to get away without discovery.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
This is the GPU I’m most excited for in 2025 — and it’s not by Nvidia
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX graphics card.

The next few months will completely redefine every ranking of the best graphics cards. With Nvidia's RTX 50-series and AMD's RDNA 4 most likely launching in January -- and even Intel possibly expanding its Battlemage lineup -- there's a lot to look forward to.

But as for me, I already know which GPU I'm most excited about. And no, it's not Nvidia's rumored almighty RTX 5090. The GPU I'm looking forward to is AMD's upcoming flagship, which will presumably be the RX 8800 XT (or perhaps the RX 9070 XT). Below, I'll tell you why I think this GPU is going to be so important not just for AMD but also for the entire graphics card market.
Setting the pace

Read more
Google Street View camera captures highly suspicious act, leading to arrests
The Google Street View image showing someone loading a large bundle into the trunk of a car.

Imagery from Google’s Street View has reportedly helped to solve a murder case in northern Spain.

Street View is the online tool that lets you view 360-degree imagery captured by cameras mounted on Google’s Street View cars that travel the world.

Read more
AMD’s RDNA 4 may surprise us in more ways than one
AMD RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT graphics cards.

Thanks to all the leaks, I thought I knew what to expect with AMD's upcoming RDNA 4. It turns out I may have been wrong on more than one account.

The latest leaks reveal that AMD's upcoming best graphics card may not be called the RX 8800 XT, as most leakers predicted, but will instead be referred to as the  RX 9070 XT. In addition, the first leaked benchmark of the GPU gives us a glimpse into the kind of performance we can expect, which could turn out to be a bit of a letdown.

Read more