Skip to main content

The iPhone 6S bests the Galaxy S7 edge by 17 seconds in this speed test

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Samsung’s new Galaxy S7 edge may feature a water-resistant design, neat camera tech, and impressive array of internals, but it might not be the fastest smartphone on the block. In a side-by-side comparison between the Galaxy S7 edge and a range of other high-end handsets including the Moto X Pure Edition, the Nexus 6P, and the iPhone 6S Plus, the Galaxy S7 edge took a bit longer on average to open, pause, and resume applications and games.

Prolific YouTuber Jerome Ortega ran the Galaxy S7 through its paces, recording with the handset’s built-in stopwatch the length of time it took to launch a predefined sequence of apps and games. He then did the same with the Nexus 6P, Moto X Pure, and iPhone 6S, quickly opening the same series of apps. The result? The Galaxy S7 edge fared well against the Nexus 6P and Moto X Pure, besting the former by two seconds and the latter by 16, but fell 17 seconds short of the iPhone 6s’s time.

Recommended Videos

On paper, that last result’s a tad surprising. The Galaxy S6 edge packs Qualcomm’s bleeding-edge quad-core Snapdragon 820 processor and 4GB of RAM, a much newer and theoretically better package than the iPhone 6s’s dual-core Apple A9 chip and 2GB of RAM. But Ortega’s findings largely line up with results from cross-platform benchmarking apps: online statistics from GFXBench show the Snapdragon 820 and A9 trading blows in 3D rendering tests.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Thermal issues may be partly at fault. In a detailed rundown of the Galaxy S7 edge, Android enthusiast community XDA Developers recorded mild throttling, or the forced slowing of hardware components due to heat buildup, during more intensive tests. The reviewers noted that the Galaxy S7’s thermal performance seemed improved over handsets packing Qualcomm’s older 810 processor, but that in severe cases, the handset became unresponsive for seconds on end.

Software’s another potential culprit. The Galaxy S7 hasn’t formally hit store shelves (and won’t until March 11). so it’s quite possible that Samsung has a few last-minute tweaks in store. That’d be par for the course: shortly after the launch of the Galaxy S6 last year, the company released a memory management fix that dramatically improved the smartphone’s responsiveness.

Ultimately, speed tests like these need be taken with a grain of salt — it’s tough to account for every variable that might affect performance. Still, if the numbers are any indication, the hardware gulf between Apple’s and Samsung’s flagships may not be as wide as anticipated.

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
I did an iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S24 Ultra camera test. The results shocked me
The back of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.

The iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra are both big phones with big screens, big power, and big price tags. The cameras are also impressive, but which one of these two archrivals takes better photos?

I’ve been using the Galaxy S24 Ultra again over the past few weeks and have put it against Apple’s latest top iPhone to find out. And the results are pretty shocking.
The cameras
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Read more
5 phones you should buy instead of the iPhone 16
Someone holding the iPhone 16.

Apple’s iPhone 16 has arrived, and it’s quite an impressive offering this year. Not only does it come in some of the best colors we’ve seen in a while, but it closes the gap between the base and Pro models even more.

That's all to say the iPhone 16 is a fantastic phone, but if you’re thinking about buying it as your next smartphone purchase, you should also consider some of these alternatives.
iPhone 16 Plus

Read more
Samsung is catching up to the iPhone in an unexpected way
A person holding a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and an Apple iPhone 15 Pro.

It's a well-known fact that Apple products retain value for much longer than non-Apple products. Or is it? According to recent data from SellCell, things might be changing.

According to its report, SellCell says that iPhones still hold their value better than the competition, but they depreciate faster with every new release. At the same time, Samsung's flagship models have begun to last a little longer. In fact — and get ready for a lot of numbers — the iPhone has seen almost a 5% drop in value year-over-year since the iPhone 12 was released — and the iPhone 16 is losing value 8% faster than the iPhone 15 and has lost an average of 41.2% of its value in the first two weeks since release. That's a much greater loss than the iPhone 14 and 15 models, at 33% and 33.2%, respectively.

Read more