Skip to main content

2014 Buick Encore review

2014 buick encore review front angle
Image used with permission by copyright holder
2014 Buick Encore
MSRP $24.00
“Most of Buick’s lineup might be stuck in the 1990s, but the Encore – despite its looks – is hugely modern and wondrously tech-savvy for the money.”
Pros
  • Tech features
  • Affordable price
  • Relatively spacious interior
Cons
  • Outdated exterior styling
  • Bland interior

General Motors filed bankruptcy a few years ago and began slashing brands. I thought, surely, Buick would get the axe along with Hummer, Saturn, and Oldsmobile.

Recommended Videos

For some reason, though, GM kept Buick on its books. This left me scratching my head with dismay.

The Encore looks as though it was designed by a man who’s never seen a car that wasn’t built by General Motors.

Unlike the brands GM kept alive, Buick didn’t seem to have an identity. Cadillac is the new BMW-fighting American brand. Chevy remains the economical family brand it’s always been. Buick, though, just seems to have simply adopted the old codgers who were scared away from Cadillac when it was rebranded as sport luxury. Why keep such a moniker?

Over the last few years, Buick answered my questions with a few new and surprising products.

First it unleashed the entry-level Verano, which is based upon the German-designed Opel Astra. While I’d never recommend the Verano over, say, the Mercedes CLA-Class, I would say it’s a fine car.

Building on that, Buick has released another variant of that Opel platform in the shape of a compact CUV called the Encore. And that is what I found myself piloting around Portland this week.

Looks and amenities

I’ve been debating my feelings on the exterior design of the Encore, and I think I’ve come to a conclusion: I like it, but just.

Like the rest of the Buick line, the Encore looks as though it was designed by a man who’s never seen a car that wasn’t built by General Motors. If the Saturn and Oldsmobile brands were your visual standard, you’d be quite proud of the Encore’s confused lines and accents. Hold it up against a comparably priced Audi Q3 or Mercedes GLA, and you’ll wonder what century the Encore is from.

Look at the thing. It has those silly, outdated hood vent things, a stubby, beak-like nose, and – for some reason – blue accenting in the headlights. With features like that, it should come with a complementary N’Sync CD. It’s wildly twee.

All that said, I kind of like it. Yes, it’s a body only its designer could love. But despite its 1990s, micro-luxury looks, it sits proud, as if it’s chiming, “my mom says I’m the handsomest boy in school!”

For that, it finds a place in my heart.

Power and handling

Under the Encore’s not-so-rakish hood is a turbocharged 1.4-liter Ecotec four-cylinder engine making 138 horsepower, which is mated to a six-speed automatic that sends power down to the front wheels. The EPA rates the Encore at 25 mpg city, 33 highway, with a combined score of 28.

Off the line, the power isn’t great – nor is traction. In the wet, anything more than three-quarters throttle will send one wheel spinning. And when it does grip, power won’t wow anyone under the age of 75. It’ll get up and go and you won’t feel like pulling over to whip some motivation into it; you just won’t be wowed either.

Buick Encore engine ecotec
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This isn’t to say the powertrain is bad. I kind of liked it. It’s got a great sound for such a little motor. Compared to other compact CUVs and it’s downright sporting. Korean engines, by comparison, buzz. This Ecotec has a mighty little roar. Again, it’s plucky. It’s scrappy.

Surprise

Yes, I was surprised Buick received a stay of execution in 2008. That aside, it’s the Encore that really surprised me.

Although it’s designed on a German platform and sold by an American automaker, the Encore is built in Korea with parts out of China. That doesn’t have any broader relevance; it’s just interesting. I just wanted you to know that.

That out of the way, let’s talk interior. The interior – just like the exterior – isn’t anything to send Buick a thank-you letter for. It’s grey and looks like most GM products. Underneath that uninspiring sea of grey buttons is shockingly impressive list of features.

For the $30,685, you get: forward-collision warning, lane-departure warning, rearview camera, side blind zone alert, rear cross-traffic alert, dual climate controls, 7-inch color IntelliLink display, Bose sound system, Bluetooth, and heated leather seats and steering wheel.

That’s more kit than you get any pretty much any car under $50,000, let alone $30,000.

Finalities

When it comes to evaluating a car, sometimes you have to sit back and look at the bigger picture. Yes it has outdated looks and its interior, though roomy, isn’t a knockout, unlike those of its competitors.

For the money, though, it’s an absolute bargain. For $30,000 you get a car that has all the comfort and features you’d expect from a Mercedes for about half of the cost. Yes, it won’t win any beauty pageants, nor will it win any races. For a comfortable runabout, full of the best tech the automotive industry has to offer, it’s a winner.

I still don’t really ‘get’ Buick. But I get the Encore. And I like it.

Highs

  • Tech features
  • Affordable price
  • Relatively spacious interior

Lows

  • Outdated exterior styling
  • Bland interior
Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E first drive review: Electric muscle
Blue Ford Mustang Mach-E on a rooftop

For its first serious attempt at a mass-market electric car, Ford decided to launch a crossover SUV inspired by one of its most iconic models, the Mustang.

The 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E will likely prove controversial with traditional fans, who are used to Mustangs having only two doors, with V8 engines under the hood. While the original Mustang is a stereotypical muscle car with decades of history, the Mach-E takes its place in a growing field of electric crossovers, competing with the Tesla Model Y and the upcoming Volkswagen ID.4 and Nissan Ariya.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more