Skip to main content

2014 Infiniti Q50S review

2014 Infiniti Q50S front angle
2014 Infiniti Q50S
MSRP $43,650.00
“The 2014 Infiniti Q50S might be one of the best-looking luxury sport sedans on the American market today. Beyond that, however, it’s a bit confused.”
Pros
  • Exterior styling
  • Butter-smooth powertrain
  • Crisp sport suspension
Cons
  • Incongruent Infiniti InTouch infotainment
  • Lifeless power steering

Let’s skip the pleasantries. Rather than buttering up this review by recalling Infiniti’s finer days, with its M45 or G37, how about we just get to the meat of the thing, shall we?

Recommended Videos

The Infiniti Q50S is one of the best looking, smoothest driving, and most confused cars on the road today.

Its features run the gamut from god-awful to awe-inspiring – and everything in between. It’s left me wanting to both high-five its designers and also spit in their coffee.

It, then, is a fun car to write about … but being interesting on paper doesn’t a good car make. There’s so much to say about this thing, so let’s just start at the very beginning (a very good place to start) with its gorgeous front end.

Paleo Diet

For the last several years, I’ve found Infinitis to be horrendous looking things.

Someone, it seemed, back at the home Japan office got the idea in his or her head that chiseled was out and that bulbous was in. The result was a line of cars that looked like they had the mumps – or had been severely stung by bees.

Thankfully, along with a new naming scheme that I won’t bother to mentioning here, Infiniti has resculpted its line, starting with the Q50. Amazingly, it’s done a bang-up job. After putting the formerly badged G37 sedan on a strict Paleo Diet, the resulting Q50 looks very handsome indeed. I dare say that it’s one of the best-looking sports sedans on the American roads today.

It’s not just handsome; it’s efficient, too. The doors have been redesigned to make getting in and out of the car easier. And the drag coefficient has dropped to 0.26, which is very slippery indeed.

Finally, the mid-size Infiniti sedan looks the part of a BMW-fighter. The same can’t be said for the rest of the car, however.

Two screens

Stepping inside, we find a very comfortable cabin that is distinctively Infiniti. What do I mean by that? Aside from the overuse of purple accent lighting (sorry, gents, this isn’t a Prince music video), buyers will find well-shaped seats, plenty of passenger room, and a dashboard that appears to have been pulled directly from a Nissan … but with extra stuff bolted on.

Aside from the exterior looks, the Q50S’ powertrain is its best feature.

The most offensive of these bolt-ons is the new touchscreen, called Infiniti InTouch next-generation Human Machine Interface, which resides beneath the now-ancient satnav screen in the center of the dash. Now, normally, a new touchscreen that is as intuitive and works as well as the one in the Q50 would receive top marks in my book. Installing it below the aforementioned navigation unit, though, is like adding insult to injury.

Infinitis have always been fairly nice on the inside, if not a bit garish. In recent years, though, the brand’s interior quality has been undermined by the nearly decades-old Nissan navigation system. Yes, it serves a purpose, but so does Veterans Administration … need I say more?

Rather than remove the old nav system from the new Q50 model, Infiniti designers added a supplemental touchscreen beneath it, which handles all other, normal infotainment tasks like phone pairing, radio, and climate control, that used to be controlled through that one nav screen – or by a series of buttons.

2014 Infiniti Q50S interior front
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While the new InTouch interface is nice to look at and brilliant to use, it’s a bit of an oddity. It’s a stark reminder that, when creating the new Q50, Infiniti wanted to spend money to make it nice … but not too much money.

“Integrate the nav into the new touchscreen, eh? Millions you say? No, let’s just put the old nav above the new screen. Then give it a marketing-speak, buzzword-y name.” It’s the incongruity of the two screens that stands as a metaphor for the rest of the car: all the best bits are nearly ruined by the poorly thought-out extras.

Having set that tone, let’s continue to the driving dynamics.

Smooth and limp

Infiniti made a name for itself with its 3.7-liter V6. Over the years, and through its applications, it’s been many things: buzzy and fast all the way to gravely and slow. Now, though, engineers have finally refined it to its finest form. Under the hood of the Q50S, it makes 328 horsepower and 269 pound-feet of torque. Thankfully, the 3.7 is now surprisingly buttery and also very, very quick – capable of 0 to 60 in around 5.0 seconds.

I dare say the Q50S one of the best-looking sports sedans on the American roads today.

All the 3.7’s power is routed through a very keenly geared seven-speed automatic transmission, which sends power to the rear wheels. Aside from the exterior looks, the Q50S’ powertrain is its best feature. The engine provides V8 levels of power, while also returning V6 levels of efficiency. Infiniti estimates the Q50S to achieve 20 mpg city, 29 highway, and a combined score of 23.

The brakes, too, are quite good. They’re sharp without being overly grabby and – at least from my several heart-rate-raising drives – virtually fade free. And the S’ sporty suspension held the body flat in hard cornering, but didn’t rattle my teeth out of my head over uneven road surfaces.

The driving brilliance ends there, I am afraid. The electric steering was absolutely lifeless and numb. German automakers have made some numb steering systems lately, but this one takes the cake. It all but ruined an otherwise excellent driving experience.

2014 Infiniti Q50S engine macro
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This, unfortunately, was the normal setup. Infiniti also offers something called “Direct Adaptive Steering”, which removes the physical connection between the steering wheel and the wheels. I’ve not yet driven this DAS system, but, given the lifelessness of the standard unit, I am sure it’s nightmarish.

Ultimately confused

The Infiniti Q50S has some excellent points. And it has some downsides, too. Frankly, every car in this sport luxury sedan does. Unlike its competitors, though, the Q50S doesn’t feel like a complete, cohesive unit.

It feels confused and like a car designed with a mixed budget. Exterior styling was given all the money it needed, as was powertrain. The interior folks were given – I’d wager – about 25 percent fewer funds than they needed. While the steering team’s budget consisted of a can with a few old nickels at the bottom.

The 2014 Q50S would have been a fine offering in, say, 2007. Right now, though, it feels eight years behind the curve.

When it comes down to it, the $46,000 versions of the Audi A4 and BMW 328i are nicer on the inside, offer a more well-rounded driving experience, and are perceived to be more up-market than the Infiniti.

I’ll give Infiniti credit for trying to spice up its mid-size sedan. But it’s a bit too little too late – and certainly not enough to defeat the Germans.

Highs

  • Exterior styling
  • Butter-smooth powertrain
  • Crisp sport suspension

Lows

  • Incongruent Infiniti InTouch infotainment
  • Lifeless power steering
Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra forge a new path for EVs
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra.

Electric vehicles are inseparable from newness, whether it’s new tech, new designs, or new companies like Rivian, Lucid, and Tesla. But the Volkswagen Group’s new EV-only brand also relies heavily on the past.

Unveiled Thursday, the Scout Traveler electric SUV and Scout Terra electric pickup truck are modern interpretations of the classic International Harvester Scout. Manufactured from 1961 to 1980, the original Scout helped popularize the idea of the rugged, off-road-capable utility vehicle, setting the stage for modern SUVs.

Read more
Robotaxi aside, a $25,000 EV would be pointless, Tesla CEO says
Blue Tesla Model 3 Highland on the road

Enthusiasts expecting to one day put their hands on the steering wheel of a $25,000 Tesla EV may feel like they’ve been taken for a ride.
CEO Elon Musk has just put a serious damper on those expectations, saying that outside of the driverless Robotaxi recently unveiled by Tesla, a regular $25,000 model would be “pointless” and “silly.”
During a conference call with investors, Musk was asked to clarify whether such a model was in the works.
"Basically, having a regular $25K model is pointless,” Musk said. “It would be silly. It would be completely at odds with what we believe." Tesla, Musk continued, has “been very clear that the future is autonomous.”
On October 10, Tesla unveiled its much-awaited robotaxi, called the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The company also unveiled the Robovan, a much larger autonomous vehicle expected to carry people or goods.
The automaker said the Cybercab is expected to be produced in 2026 and cost $30,000. Musk, meanwhile, said that it would be a $25,000 car without specifying if that price tag included federal tax credits.
Tesla’s ambiguity about an affordable entry-level model has been going on for years. In 2020, Musk signaled that a $25,000 Tesla would arrive within three years. It was later reported that Tesla had ditched the idea, instead favoring the development of a robotaxi.
Language within Tesla’s latest financial report still hints that new affordable Tesla models are on the way. But Musk’s latest comments are putting a floor on just how affordable these would be. So far, Tesla’s Model 3 Rear-Wheel-Drive remains the company’s cheapest model, with a base price of $38,990.
Some rival EV makers, meanwhile, are entering the affordable space more aggressively in the U.S.
General Motors has already put out its Chevy Equinox EV at a price of $27,500, including federal tax credits. Volkswagen America says it plans to release an under-$35,000 EV in the U.S. by 2027.

Read more
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more