Skip to main content

2012 Nissan Versa review

2012 Nissan Versa
MSRP $11.00
“It might be the driving equivalent of a trip the dentist, but the 2012 Nissan Versa is a roomy, well-built car.”
Pros
  • Great Fuel economy
  • Spacious Interior
  • Cut-throat pricing
Cons
  • Uninspired handling and performance
  • Noisy interior
  • Largely lacking in comfort features
  • Sluggish CVT

If your war chest isn’t what it used to be, or you’re simply looking to purchase your first set of wheels, now is a great time to shop around. Gone are the days when buying an entry-level car meant giving up more of your bank account than you’re prepared for. Nowadays economy cars sport snazzier designs, snappy interiors, and are crammed with more options than ever before, while cutting costs and features has given way to wide array of comforts typically enjoyed up the ladder.

Recommended Videos

For the 2012 Nissan Versa, the Japanese automaker has attempted to deliver an inexpensive ride with just enough of a pulse in the hopes of attracting buyers looking for more than what entry-level vehicles have traditionally offered.

So how does the Versa fair? Well, with respectable fuel economy, a roomy interior and attractive price point, the 2012 Versa will easily lure in more economy-minded buyers, but its painfully dull exterior and uninspired drive managed to appeal to our fiscal sensibilities more than anything else.

Space Versa style

While we haven’t driven last year’s model, the 2012 Versa remains largely unchanged. Nissan has managed to shed about 150 pounds of the latest Versa with styling cues carrying over faithfully.

Unfortunately from a design perspective, the Versa does very little to generate excitement. While the hatchback model offers a little more skip to its step and added utility – although not really enough, in our humble opinion — our Versa sedan review unit exhibits truly vanilla visuals. It’s not ugly, poorly designed, or anything of the sort – it’s just…well, boring. And when you take into account the more aesthetically pleasing competition populating the segment, like the Kia Rio, Honda Fit and the Ford Fiesta, you too will have difficulty averting your eyes from the Versa’s more attractive rivals.

2012 nissan versan review subcompact car interior front
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Luckily the Versa’s interior picks up the slack a bit. Not in a unique, stylish or anything-close-to-fun sort of way — but it’s solid, roomy, and easily fits four full-sized adults (not a task easily accomplished in the segment). Sitting in the driver’s seat is fairly comfortable, and about what we would expect from a car in its class.

Taller passengers will find headroom is abundant throughout, with plenty of legroom to go around. And for its small stature the Versa punches well above its weight — even daring to encroach on territory occupied by larger cars like the Accord and Camry, delivering ample space up front and in the rear. Cargo room is equally impressive with a total of 14.8 cubic feet. Drivers looking to administer austerity measures will no doubt happily trade pizazz for practicality.

Big yet barren

While you can consider us on board with the ever-increasing presence of new and useful technology, cluttering up interiors and needlessly jamming in buttons and screens is thoroughly annoying. Such distractions are not, however, a problem here. That said, the Versa does teeter on the verge of being barren, with not so much as an inner armrest to be found.

Image used with permission by copyright holder
       

Despite our S models rather desolate, yet cavernous, interior, the 2012 Nissan Versa never feels cheap – it just looks cheap. And not because of the materials used; the silver trim accents on the steering wheel add a helpful bit of bling. It’s just seems that, in designing the Versa, Nissan appeared more concerned with making the interior look and feel as spacious as possible than making it look and feel high-quality. This is all well and good, of course, but a little pampering would have done wonders. At least give us an armrest Nissan! (We’re really hung up on that, as you can tell.)

The list doesn’t stop there though. Standard equipment on the S trim level excludes amenities such as power windows, power locks, and limits the number of speakers to two, but includes air conditioning and an AM/FM CD stereo along with an aux port perfect for bringing along your MP3 player’s vast library of tunes. For $350, customers can throw down for the S Cruise Control package, which includes an additional trunk light and two rear speakers.

Fuel — not fun — for the frugal

New to the 2012 Versa sedan is a revised 109 horsepower, 1.6-liter four-cylinder CVT engine that delivers excellent fuel economy and little else.

The CVT outfitted sedan garners the best EPA rated fuel economy among its various drivetrains, netting 30 mpg in the city and 38 on the highway, while the five-speed manual sees those numbers drop to 27/36. It doesn’t quite reach the heralded 40 mpg club occupied by the Ford Fiesta or Chevy Sonic, but it’s up there among the top fuel earners nonetheless.

Observant individuals and eco-minded drivers will be happy about the 2012 Vera’s “Puredrive” badging, which appears on the trunk lid and indicates the 1.6-liter engine’s lower carbon-dioxide emissions.

2012 nissan versa review subcompact car promoLike most entry-level cars the Versa drives adequately enough for your day-to-day grind, and is best when confined to suburban and city driving. Tackling hills and passing traffic on the freeway can be a difficult endeavor, which is where the Versa truly struggles. Road noise can be overly intrusive and the car tends to lose stability when asked to exceed anything above 65 mph.

Because of its ability to deliver a righteous boost to fuel economy, we’re able to overlook certain shortcomings, like the Versa’s deafening CVT engine and lethargic performance. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the Versa’s handling.

Steering into and out of sharper turns and curves does little to instill confidence in the Versa’s road characteristics and is best approached with caution and sensibility. It never encroaches upon feeling unsafe or dangerous, but the Versa just doesn’t respond well to more demanding scenarios. Needless to say, driving the Versa is a rather uninspiring experience, but it is a practical one, so bear that in mind and weigh what type of driving experience truly matters to you.

Finish line

Sadly, we can’t all drive around in Maseratis, Benzes, or chromed-out Fisker Karmas (you know who you are). But those of us who happen to occupy the bottom end of the automotive food chain still feel entitled to competent, stylish, and comfortable cars for our hard-earned cash. Unfortunately, the 2012 Nissan Versa falls short of some of those expectations.

2012 nissan versa review subcompact car top down roof angle
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While the Versa’s design is about as exciting as Kristin Stewart demonstrating her acting range, it more than makes up for with its unrivaled value (base price starts at $11,750 including a $760 destination fee) and completive fuel economy. Toss in an automatic CVT engine like the one found in our review unit, $350 Cruise Control Package, carpeted floor and trunk mats for $170, and that price jumps to just over $14,000.

It might be the driving equivalent of a trip the dentist, but the 2012 Nissan Versa is a roomy, well-built car. It doesn’t deliver a gripping driving experience, but makes a compelling argument with its roomy interior, excellent fuel economy, and wallet-friendly sticker price. Cash-strapped shoppers or first-time buyers would do well to at least give the Versa a test drive, but will ultimately find more exciting alternatives among its competitors.

Highs:

  • Great Fuel economy
  • Spacious Interior
  • Cut-throat pricing

Lows:

  • Uninspired handling and performance
  • Noisy interior
  • Largely lacking in comfort features
  • Sluggish CVT
Amir Iliaifar
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Associate Automotive Section Editor for Digital Trends, Amir Iliaifar covers the ever increasing cross-section between tech…
2023 Kia Niro EV first drive review: Practical doesn’t have to bore you to tears
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Kia Niro EV.

If you want to see just how quickly the electric car landscape has changed over the past few years, take a look at the redesigned 2023 Kia Niro EV.
When the first-generation Niro EV launched for the 2019 model year (following hybrid and plug-in hybrid Niro variants), it was a pretty big deal. The Niro was Kia’s first EV not based on a conventional gasoline model, and the first intended for high sales volumes.
The second-generation 2023 Niro EV boasts more tech, more space, and more extroverted styling than its predecessor, but it’s still very much in the shadow of the Kia EV6. Once Kia’s main EV attraction, the Niro is being refocused as a more affordable option to take on the likes of the Chevrolet Bolt EV/Bolt EUV, Volkswagen ID.4, and Nissan Leaf.
Kia plans to offer the Niro EV in trim levels named Wind and Wave, but hasn’t released pricing for either. Note that the previous-generation 2022 Niro EV started at $41,245; the new model could see a price increase because of its updates. And because it’s assembled in South Korea, the 2023 Niro EV won’t qualify for the revamped federal EV tax credit, Kia has confirmed.

Design and interior
Like the previous generation, the Niro is part of a three-pronged lineup that also includes the Niro Hybrid and Niro PHEV (plug-in hybrid models). All three maintain the tall-wagon shape of the first-generation Niro, but with much bolder styling.
Where the previous Niro was a wishy-washy mix of car and SUV styling elements, the 2023 Niro is the result of the same fearless design department that produced the EV6 and the 2023 Kia Sportage. The traditional automotive “face” was rearranged with a visor-like element, protruding grille, and hexagonal lighting elements. Contrasting trim panels break up the profile view, and conceal “Air Blade” elements around the taillights that, Kia claims, reduce aerodynamic drag.
Kia used sustainable materials to further decrease the Niro EV’s environmental impact.

Read more
Nissan wants the 2023 Ariya to be its comeback EV, but the bar has been raised
Front view of the 2023 Nissan Ariya.

Nissan played an understated role in the modern era of electric cars. While Tesla gets most of the attention, the Nissan Leaf became the first modern mass-market EV when it launched in December 2010. But Nissan has squandered that early lead. The Leaf remains a decent car, but Nissan needed to follow it up with another model, specifically an SUV, that would appeal to more car shoppers. That’s where the 2023 Nissan Ariya comes in.
The Ariya is the long-awaited sequel to the Leaf, boosting updated tech, better performance, and an SUV body style to match current trends. But during the Ariya’s long gestation (it was originally supposed to launch in 2021), other automakers have come up with electric SUVs of their own. So while it was once a leader, Nissan must now follow the Ford Mustang Mach-E, Hyundai Ioniq 5, and Kia EV6, among others.
Pricing starts at $44,485 (with destination) for the base Ariya Engage trim level with front-wheel drive and the smaller 65-kilowatt-hour (63-kWh usable capacity) battery pack. Pricing rises to $61,485 for the top Platinum+ model with all-wheel drive and a 91-kWh (87-kWh usable capacity) pack, but all-wheel drive models won’t arrive until after the front-wheel drive models. Nissan hasn’t discussed plans to assemble the Ariya in the U.S., so it likely won’t qualify for the revised federal EV tax credit.

Design and interior
If it had launched even two years ago, the Ariya would have looked cutting-edge. Its rounded exterior surfaces make a nod to aerodynamics while still preserving the SUV look buyers love. It’s a nice-looking vehicle too, but so are the Ford Mustang Mach-E, Hyundai Ioniq 5, and Kia EV6, all of which have gone on sale since the Ariya was announced in 2020. Nissan is no longer a trendsetter, but the Ariya can at least claim a more SUV-like feel than those other EVs, in both its tall profile and high-and-mighty driving position.
More significant than the styling, though, is that the Ariya rides on a new EV-specific platform. In contrast to the Leaf, which shares some of its structure with gasoline cars, engineers could take full advantage of the efficiencies of an electric powertrain and maximize interior space. Like certain other automakers, Nissan also opted out of a frunk in order to maximize passenger space, moving components like the air conditioner under the hood to make more room in the cabin.
Rounded surfaces nod to aerodynamics while still preserving the SUV look buyers love.

Read more
2022 Volkswagen ID. Buzz first drive review: The iconic hippie hauler goes electric
Volkwagen's ID. Buzz drives down the road.

Volkswagen's growing family of ID-badged electric cars has a new mascot: the ID. Buzz. Inspired by the vintage air-cooled Bus models and previewed by a close-to-production concept unveiled in 2017, the heritage-laced van offers an electric powertrain, an eye-catching design, plus an interior that's high-tech and almost lounge-like. I tested a Buzz prototype in England in February 2022 and walked away impressed, and time driving a regular-production model in and around Copenhagen, Denmark, confirmed these impressions. This was worth the wait.
Design and interior
While you can tell that the Buzz is on the same branch of the Volkswagen family tree as the split- and bay-window Buses prized by hippies decades ago, designers decided not to go full-retro as they did with the New Beetle released in 1997. The headlights aren't round, for example, and they're much higher than the original van's. It's the same story out back: The lights are horizontal, located right below the big hatch's window, and connected by a light bar. This is intentional -- Volkswagen aimed to echo the original model without cloning it.

In terms of proportions, the Buzz is pretty spot on. The front end isn't entirely flat and the front doors are positioned behind the front wheels rather than over them, but the design is as close to the old van's as modern regulations allow. The Buzz variant that I drove in Denmark measures 185.5 inches long, 78.1 inches wide, and 76.8 inches tall, so it's about as long as a Tiguan but around 10 inches taller and five inches wider. This is what Volkswagen refers to as the short-wheelbase model, and it's not coming to the United States. We'll get a long-wheelbase model that hasn't been unveiled yet; it should look just like the European-spec model but with more space between the front and rear axles.

Read more