Skip to main content

2013 Dodge Dart Aero: 41 mpg for $20,090

2013_Dodge_DartThe new Dodge Dart is a promising first collaboration for Chrysler and Fiat, but it doesn’t achieve the magic 40 mpg (highway) that every compact car is expected to, falling just short of that goal with 39 mpg highway. Now, Dodge has rectified that with the 2013 Dart Aero, which achieves 41 mpg highway with a manual transmission, and 40 mpg with an automatic.

The Dart Aero is a fuel economy special like the Ford Focus SFE and Chevrolet Cruze Eco. Like its Detroit rivals, the Dart uses aerodynamic tricks like grille shutters and underbody panels to reduce drag, as well as low-rolling resistance tires. All of that is needed for one to two mpg.

Recommended Videos

Under the hood is the 1.4-liter turbocharged inline-four found in other Darts and the Fiat 500 Abarth. In the Aero, it produces the same 160 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque it does in non-Aero Darts.

Now that the Dart has joined the 40 mpg club, it will have to fend off competition from the Ford and Chevy fuel economy specials, as well as the Honda Civic HF. The Mazda 3 and Hyundai Elantra also return 40 mpg, without any add-ons. Nissan is claiming 40 mpg for its redesigned 2013 Sentra (with the optional FE+ package), but that car hasn’t completed EPA testing.

In highway mileage, it’s nearly a dead heat, with the manual transmission Crzue boasting 42 mpg, the Dart and Civic at 41, and the rest of the packing at an even 40 mpg.

In city driving, there is a pretty steep drop-off in mileage. The Dart comes in last place here, with 27 mpg city. The rest of the pack achieves 28 or 29 mpg.

The Dodge does have some advantages outside the realm of fuel economy. At $20,090 with destination, the Dart is only undercut by the $17,740 Elantra and the $20,020 Mazda.

For that price, Dart buyers get more than most competitors. The Dart is tied with the Focus SFE for most horsepower in the 40 mpg compact car class. It also gets niceties like a leather-wrapped steering wheel, auto headlights, and “racetrack” LED taillights from the upscale Dart Limited. As with other Darts, an 8.4-inch touchscreen, 7-inch reconfigurable TFT gauge cluster, and wireless charging mat are optional.

For compact cars, 40 mpg highway is becoming more of a standard than a selling point. The Dart Aero’s modifications meet that standard, but it’s hard to pick a clear fuel economy winner when the numbers are this close. The Aero’s strongest selling point will probably be the fact that it’s a Dart: it puts good fuel economy in an attractive package.

Topics
Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more