Skip to main content

Alfa Romeo proves topless is always best with its 2015 4C Spider

Fiat’s Alfa Romeo division will introduce the 2015 4C Spider at the Detroit Motor Show, proving once and for all that it is serious about returning to North America after a long hiatus.

Previewed by a thinly-veiled concept that bowed last year in Geneva, the 4C Spider is essentially identical to the existing 4C Coupe but it gains more conventional-looking headlights, a carbon fiber windshield frame and a removable hard top that is also crafted out of carbon fiber. Alfa has previously confirmed that the Spider’s headlights will be available on the coupe as a no-cost option.

Inside, the 4C Spider boasts a race-inspired cockpit with a two-spoke flat-bottomed steering wheel, a driver-oriented center console and a digital instrument cluster. Bare carbon fiber adds a finishing touch to the track-ready look while hinting at the Spider’s ultra-lightweight construction.

Alfa Romeo has not made any mechanical changes to the 4C Spider, meaning that power comes from a mid-mounted 1.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that generates 237 horsepower at 6,000 rpms and 258 foot-pounds of torque between 2,200 and 4,250 rpms. Linked to a six-speed dual-clutch transmission controlled by shift paddles, the turbo four sends the 2,487-pound Spider from zero to 62 mph in 4.1 seconds and on to a top speed of 160 mph.

Alfa has partially offset the weight added by the convertible conversion by making the windshield and the side windows out of 10-percent thinner glass. Like the coupe, the 4C Spider is so light that it does not come with power steering.

Those looking to take their 4C racing can order the optional Track Package which adds larger sway bars on both ends, high-performance shock absorbers and additional carbon fiber trim inside out. The list of standalone options includes an Akrapovic exhaust system and Pirelli P Zero tires.

After greeting the show-going public in Detroit, the 2015 Alfa Romeo 4C will begin to arrive in dealerships next summer.

Ronan Glon
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more