Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Lexus RC F vs. BMW M4: Which luxury hotrod belongs in your heated garage?

In 1985, BMW launched the original E30-generation M3, and put a target on its back.

The M3 offered the ferocious performance in the body of a practical two-door coupe, and it’s proved an irresistible combination ever since.

Over the years, the M3 has accumulated quite a rogue’s gallery – from the Mercedes-Benz 190E 16V Cosworth to the Audi RS4 – and they keep coming.

In 2008, Lexus launched the IS F, a bulked up V8-powered sedan that had the M3 in its sights, and at the recent 2014 Detroit Auto Show it unveiled a two-door successor called the RC F.

Across Cobo Hall from Lexus’ stand was the latest two-door BMW M model, now wearing M4 badging. The battle lines have been drawn.

Exterior design

Both of these cars are hot-rodded versions of “ordinary” luxury coupes, so designers were faced with the task of enhancing what was already there, without making the end results look like something from Fast & Furious.

You really do have to like the boy-racer look to appreciate the M4 and RC F, with their flared fenders, gaping front air intakes, and massive exhaust outlets.

The M4 is no shrinking violet, but it’s definitely the more restrained of the two.

That’s mostly down to the base 4 Series coupe’s minimalist styling, which looks handsome without taking any chances. Add more aggressive front and rear fascias, a hood bulge, and unpainted carbon fiber roof, and you’ve got an M4.

Lexus took a lot of risks with the RC coupe, which wears the same manic styling as the IS sedan it’s based on.

Those extroverted cues are compounded by styling elements taken from the departed IS F and the LFA supercar, including flared fenders and unusual stacked quad exhaust outlets.

In the end, neither car is classically pretty, but both will attract plenty of attention on the street. 

The BMW will appeal to buyers who want a degree of subtlety, and is a bit more dignified than its Japanese rival.

The Lexus lets it all hang out – as any good performance car should – and proves that sporty coupes don’t need to be stealthy.

For trying something new, Lexus gets the nod here.

Interior design, comfort, amenities

Like the exteriors, the interiors of the M4 and RC F are upgraded versions of what you’ll find in the respective base models.

For the BMW, that means a traditional-looking cabin with a console-mounted rotary infotainment controller, and the company’s baffling automatic shifter.

The Lexus’ interior is essentially carried over from the IS, with a slightly more expressive design, augmented with a new sport steering wheel. 

The F model also features the same multifunction binnacle as the LFA, which slides sideways to reveal secondary information. This can be a bit distracting.

Both interiors’ familiarity will probably make fast driving easier, but neither is particualrly remarkable.

This round is a tie.

Powertrain

When it comes to powertrains, BMW and Lexus seem to be moving in opposite directions.

The last M3 coupe was powered by a 4.0-liter V8, but the new M4 has a twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six under the hood, producing 425 horsepower and 406 pound-feet of torque.

Instead of making its engine smaller in response to the clarion call of efficiency, Lexus stuck with a 5.0-liter V8 for the RC F. Final figures aren’t in, but Lexus says it will produce more than 450 hp and more than 383 lb-ft of torque.

The M4 will be offered with either a six-speed manual or seven-speed M DCT dual-clutch automatic transmission. The Lexus gets an eight-speed auto, and both cars are rear-wheel drive.

Enthusiasts will definitely appreciate the availability of a clutch pedal in the M4, and the M DCT’s twin clutches will probably shave precious tenths off lap times.

So while the Lexus has more power than the BMW (albeit less torque), the M4 will probably be a more engaging drive.

Factor in the M4’s likely better fuel economy, and the Bavarian brigade wins this round.

Performance

This is what the M4 and RC F are all about. It’s what makes M and F more than just random letters.

BMW says the M4 will do 0 to 60 mph in 3.9 seconds with the M DCT dual-clutch gearbox (4.1 with the manual), and its top speed is electronically limited to 155 mph.

Lexus hasn’t released any hard numbers for the RC F, but 5.0 liters and eight cylinders should allow it to keep up with the beast from Bavaria.

Both cars deploy a significant amount of gadgetry in the pursuit of speed.

In addition to its dual-clutch transmission, the M4 has an Active M Differential that electronically metes out power to prevent the rear tires from getting vaporized.

There’s also M-tuned electric power steering, and Adaptive M Suspension set up with input from DTM drivers Bruno Spengler and Timo Glock.

Lexus doesn’t have any factory race drivers at its disposal, but it did give the RC F its own fully-independent suspension system with monotube gas-filled shocks.

The RC F also has its own trick differential, the Torque Vectoring Differential (TVD), which has three traction modes.

How all of these systems work together will be the key to each car’s success.

Four previous generations of M3 have given BMW plenty of experience, so it’s the odds-on favorite until we can get behind the wheel of both cars.

Cool factor

Both cars are likely to get plenty of attention thanks to their powerful engines and anabolic looks, but there may be a difference when bystanders see the badges.

Even with the new M4 designation, the successor to the M3 coupe is, to say the least, a known quantity. It’s a legend among gearheads, and even the less car-obsessed have probably heard of a BMW M3.

Tell your friends you’re driving a Lexus, and they’ll be impressed by the car’s sticker price more than anything else. The RC F is a brand new and–despite the IS F precedence–still a new type of car for the brand.

So people might not appreciate the RC F for what it is at first glance.

The M4 has street cred, and decades of racing heritage leading right up to today’s DTM cars, which is all pretty cool.

While the M4 is the cooler car, the RC F might be the perfect car for high-speed nonconformists.

In cool factor, then, the RC F takes the checkered flag.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more
Costco partners with Electric Era to bring back EV charging in the U.S.
costco ev charging us electricera fast station 1260x945

Costco, known for its discount gas stations, has left EV drivers in need of juicing up out in the cold for the past 12 years. But that seems about to change now that the big-box retailer is putting its brand name on a DC fast-charging station in Ridgefield, Washington.
After being one of the early pioneers of EV charging in the 1990s, Costco abandoned the offering in 2012 in the U.S.
While opening just one station may seem like a timid move, the speed at which the station was installed -- just seven weeks -- could indicate big plans going forward.
Besides lightening-speed installation, Electric Era, the Seattle-based company making and installing the charging station, promises to offer “hyper-reliable, battery-backed fast charging technology in grid-constrained locations.”
Its stalls can deliver up to 200 kilowatts and come with built-in battery storage, allowing for lower electricity rates and the ability to remain operational even when power grids go down.
If that sounds like it could very well rival Tesla’s SuperCharger network, it’s no coincidence: Quincy Lee, its CEO, is a former SpaceX engineer.
Costco also seems confident enough in the company to have put its brand name on the EV-charging station. Last year, the wholesaler did open a pilot station in Denver, this time partnering with Electrify America, the largest charging network in the U.S. However, Costco did not put its brand name on it.
In an interview with Green Car Reports, Electric Era said it was still in talks with Costco about the opening of new locations. Last year, Costco said it was planning to install fast chargers at 20 locations, without providing further details. It has maintained EV-charging operations in Canada, the UK, Spain, and South Korea.
Meanwhile, the wholesaler’s U.S. EV-charging plans might very well resemble those of rival Walmart, which last year announced it was building its own EV fast-charging network in addition to the arrangements it already had with Electrify America.

Read more
The UK’s Wayve brings its AI automated driving software to U.S. shores
wayve ai automated driving us driver assist2 1920x1152 1

It might seem that the autonomous driving trend is moving at full speed and on its own accord, especially if you live in California.Wayve, a UK startup that has received over $1 billion in funding, is now joining the crowded party by launching on-road testing of its AI learning system on the streets of San Francisco and the Bay Area.The announcement comes just weeks after Tesla unveiled its Robotaxi at the Warner Bros Studios in Burbank, California. It was also in San Francisco that an accident last year forced General Motors’ robotaxi service Cruise to stop its operations. And it’s mostly in California that Waymo, the only functioning robotaxi service in the U.S., first deployed its fleet of self-driving cars. As part of its move, Wayve opened a new office in Silicon Valley to support its U.S. expansion and AI development. Similarly to Tesla’s Full-Self Driving (FSD) software, the company says it’s using AI to provide automakers with a full range of driver assistance and automation features.“We are now testing our AI software in real-world environments across two continents,” said Alex Kendall, Wayve co-founder and CEO.The company has already conducted tests on UK roads since 2018. It received a huge boost earlier this year when it raised over $1 billion in a move led by Softbank and joined by Microsoft and Nvidia. In August, Uber also said it would invest to help the development of Wayve’s technology.Just like Tesla’s FSD, Wayve’s software provides an advanced driver assistance system that still requires driver supervision.Before driverless vehicles can legally hit the road, they must first pass strict safety tests.So far, Waymo’s technology, which relies on pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), is the only of its kind to have received the nod from U.S. regulators.

Read more