Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Reviews

Joy ride: 2015 Nissan GT-R NISMO

By

The 2015 Nissan GT-R NISMO isn’t quite as value-friendly as the GT-R has been in the past, but it’s faster and more nimble than ever before.

After only 15 minutes of seat time with the all-new, $150,000 Nissan GT-R NISMO, I’m starting to wonder why anyone buys quarter-million dollar supercars anymore.

Recommended Videos

NISMO, Nissan’s high-performance arm (think Mercedes’ AMG or BMW’s M division), has created one of the fastest cars in the world for a relative bargain. Think about it this way: for just about the same money as the GT-R NISMO, buyers can get an Audi R8 V10. Yes, the R8 has more street cred, but it’ll lose in a head-to-head race with the GT-R …. every single time.

Speed through subtleties

For 2014, Nissan took the necessary measures to improve GT-R owners’ biggest complaint: interior refinement. While I appreciated the improvements, it’s still hard to say that the GT-R is on par with other $100,000 sports cars on the market. In terms of performance, however, the GT-R outshines supercars that are twice the money – and then some.

For 2015 year, the introduction of the NISMO model dials the go-fast figures up even further, creating an ultimate – and perhaps final – version of the supercar before it gets redesigned next year.

Unfortunately, this quick spin didn’t include any track time. However, it did include a back-to-back comparison with the “Track” trim of the standard GT-R, and the differences were pretty obvious.

First and foremost, there are a few styling differences that will immediately set the NISMO apart from the other Godzilla (the GT-R nickname) variants on the road. The NISMO brand makes tasteful use of red trim bits, which can be seen in both the front and rear. There’s also a special wing spoiler, set of wheels, and optional titanium exhaust – a NISMO exclusive that looks and sounds more aggressive – all of which should scream to onlookers that this is no standard, slouchy GT-R; this is a purpose-built, track-focused spine mangler.

In terms of performance the GT-R outshines supercars that are twice the money – and then some.

Inside, there’s NISMO branding galore, but little else changes. Buyers still get the same comfortable, supportive seats, beefy steering wheel, and customizable performance screens as the standard GT-R.

In stark comparison to many of the GT-R’s competitors, it offers a rear seat and a proper trunk. Admittedly, they’re both cramped – even on a good day – but the extra space is a luxury that buyers just won’t find in most other supercars.

Roll the car onto the asphalt, and you’ll find a less restrained vehicle than the GT-R has ever been in the past. The dual-clutch automatic still feels a little unrefined, but it gets the job done. However, the hand-built, twin-turbocharged 3.8-liter V6 engine puts down a massive 600 horsepower and 481 pound-feet of torque – up from the already enormous 545 hp on the base model.

Once those turbos spool, the experience falls categorically into supercar territory. Head pinned and knuckles white, the GT-R NISMO’s launch from zero is sphincter-clenching moment … 100 percent of the time. That’s what 0 to 60 in 2.9 seconds will do to you.

2015 Nissan GT-R NISMO
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Thanks to its sophisticated all-wheel-drive system and a dedicated computer to support that system, the drama ends almost immediately after that. Traction is immense around cloverleaf turns and twisting roads, and the GT-R feels almost lazy, underwhelmed on surface streets. In the NISMO model, the GT-R’s suspension has been stiffened and retuned significantly. These suspension tweaks can be quickly felt in sweeping, high-speed turns.

Otherwise, the GT-R NISMO remains perhaps the most practical two-door supercar on the market, even despite its stiff ride. It’s a large car, and at least the front two passengers can sit comfortably in its soft, but supportive seats, as well as toss their weekend bags into the trunk. And, unlike its competitors, you can toss the kids in the back, too.

Conclusion

While the 2015 Nissan GT-R NISMO may not be the most refined supercar on the market, it remains the quickest car money can buy, even as its price climbs to $150,000.

It’s probably fair to say that this model has started to lose a little in terms of its value statement, especially compared to the “slower” early models that cost less than half that when they were new.

The fact that it can keep up with the Porsche 911 Turbo S, Ferrari 458, Lamborghini Huracán, and McLaren 650S in a straight line and around the track, however, still makes the Nissan GT-R NISMO one of the most interesting purchases a supercar buyer can make.

Highs

  • Faster than cheaper than anything else for the same money
  • Incredible traction
  • The most trackable version of the GT-R

Lows

  • Design beginning to look vintage
  • Interior quality not quite up to snuff
  • Clunky transmission noises
Topics
Davis Adams
Davis Adams
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Whether you're talking about gadgets or cars, Davis always seems to prefer "next year's models." He's a neophile to the core…
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra forge a new path for EVs
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra.

Electric vehicles are inseparable from newness, whether it’s new tech, new designs, or new companies like Rivian, Lucid, and Tesla. But the Volkswagen Group’s new EV-only brand also relies heavily on the past.

Unveiled Thursday, the Scout Traveler electric SUV and Scout Terra electric pickup truck are modern interpretations of the classic International Harvester Scout. Manufactured from 1961 to 1980, the original Scout helped popularize the idea of the rugged, off-road-capable utility vehicle, setting the stage for modern SUVs.

Read more
Robotaxi aside, a $25,000 EV would be pointless, Tesla CEO says
Blue Tesla Model 3 Highland on the road

Enthusiasts expecting to one day put their hands on the steering wheel of a $25,000 Tesla EV may feel like they’ve been taken for a ride.
CEO Elon Musk has just put a serious damper on those expectations, saying that outside of the driverless Robotaxi recently unveiled by Tesla, a regular $25,000 model would be “pointless” and “silly.”
During a conference call with investors, Musk was asked to clarify whether such a model was in the works.
"Basically, having a regular $25K model is pointless,” Musk said. “It would be silly. It would be completely at odds with what we believe." Tesla, Musk continued, has “been very clear that the future is autonomous.”
On October 10, Tesla unveiled its much-awaited robotaxi, called the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The company also unveiled the Robovan, a much larger autonomous vehicle expected to carry people or goods.
The automaker said the Cybercab is expected to be produced in 2026 and cost $30,000. Musk, meanwhile, said that it would be a $25,000 car without specifying if that price tag included federal tax credits.
Tesla’s ambiguity about an affordable entry-level model has been going on for years. In 2020, Musk signaled that a $25,000 Tesla would arrive within three years. It was later reported that Tesla had ditched the idea, instead favoring the development of a robotaxi.
Language within Tesla’s latest financial report still hints that new affordable Tesla models are on the way. But Musk’s latest comments are putting a floor on just how affordable these would be. So far, Tesla’s Model 3 Rear-Wheel-Drive remains the company’s cheapest model, with a base price of $38,990.
Some rival EV makers, meanwhile, are entering the affordable space more aggressively in the U.S.
General Motors has already put out its Chevy Equinox EV at a price of $27,500, including federal tax credits. Volkswagen America says it plans to release an under-$35,000 EV in the U.S. by 2027.

Read more
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more