Skip to main content

Battle of the rally cars: 2014 versus 2015 Subaru WRX

Born on rally stages and coveted by a generation of Gran Turismo gamers, the Subaru WRX redefined affordable performance when it first landed on U.S. shores for the 2002 model year. More than a decade later, it’s a cult hero.

While onetime rival Mitsubishi’s Lancer Evolution withers, Subaru unveiled the redesigned 2015 WRX at the 2013 Los Angeles Auto Show.

As with every redesign of a popular model, Subaru had to balance making meaningful improvements with respect for what made the WRX a fan favorite. Here’s how the new model stacks up against its predecessor. 

Exterior design

Despite an alluring concept from the 2013 New York Auto Show that seemed to indicate otherwise, the 2015 WRX is once again based on the Impreza compact.

That’s not a bad thing though, as both the 2015 and 2014 versions have plenty of attitude courtesy of flared wheel arches, bigger wheels and tires, and hood scoops.

However, the 2015 WRX has a much crisper, more aggressive design. The third-generation Impreza that formed the basis for the 2014 WRX had blander, more generic styling, and even the WRX treatment couldn’t fully cure that.

The only aesthetic disadvantage to the 2015 is the lack of a hatchback body style, which has some fans seething.

Regardless of which WRX you buy, there’s only one proper color scheme: WR Blue paint with gold wheels, just like the factory World Rally Championship racers of the 1990s and 2000s that give this car its pedigree.

Interior design, comfort, amenities

The 2015 WRX is much more spacious than the 2014 thanks, again, to the redesigned Impreza base car. Subjectively, the difference between new car and old feels like trading a compact car for a midsize.

There are also a few new toys, including a standard 4.3-inch LCD center-stack display (with a digital boost gauge, among other features), rearview camera, and optional 9-speaker Harman Kardon audio system.

Both cars feature simple, straightforward interiors. These are cars built to encourage their drivers to look out the windshield, not down at a modernist cup holder.

Still, the more spacious and better-equipped 2015 WRX gets the nod here.

Powertrain

Just as a Ford Mustang wouldn’t be a Mustang without a V8, a WRX wouldn’t be a WRX without a turbocharged boxer-four engine.

The 2015 WRX uses a new 2.0-liter version shared with the Forester XT. It produces 268 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque, compared to 265 hp and 244 lb-ft from last year’s 2.5-liter mill.

However, the most controversial change for 2015 is the addition of a seemingly-unsporty continuously-variable transmission (CVT) alongside a six-speed manual. The 2014 WRX was only available with a five-speed manual.

The two models are about evenly matched here. 

Since the CVT is an option (one hardcore Subaru fans will likely avoid like the plague) it really comes down to the 2015’s extra manual-transmission gear ratio. That’s an important improvement, but not important enough to give the 2015 WRX a win in the powertrain contest.

Performance

The 2015 WRX gets some other mechanical hardware that, according to Subaru, will make it easier to drive fast. 

There are now two versions of the Japanese carmaker’s Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system, one for each transmission. Among other differences, manual cars get a 50:50 front-rear torque split, while automatics get a 45:55 split.

Other additions for 2015 include electric power steering, an Active Torque Vectoring system – which uses the front brakes to redistribute power and lessen understeer – and the SI Drive control system formally exclusive to the more expensive WRX STI.

All of these additions should make it much easier to probe the new WRX’s limits, although drivers used to the more basic 2014 model might not be too enthusiastic about so many electronic backseat drivers. 

Price

The 2015 Subaru WRX starts at $27,090 (including destination), compared to $26,790 for a base 2014 model. 

A range-topping WRX Limited with a CVT costs $31,990, while the 2014 WRX Limited five-door – the most expensive 2014 model – started at $30,290.

So prices haven’t gone up significantly, but the 2015 WRX is probably the better value considering its higher equipment level.

However, Subarus are as tough as cockroaches, so a used 2014 model isn’t exactly a penalty, especially for drivers who care less about tech.

Cool factor

The 2015 and 2014 Subaru WRX may appear similar at first glance, but they have different character traits.

The 2014 WRX is rough and ready, a compact sedan (or hatchback) with rally-car running gear that delights with its unadulterated approach to performance.

The best way to describe the 2015 WRX is “grown up”. Everything from the styling to the steering and all-wheel drive systems is more polished, more refined, and will likely be easier to live with.

Refinement and ease of use are important, but they generally don’t factor into considerations of coolness.

So while the 2015 WRX is undoubtedly the better car, the 2014 is the cooler car.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more