Subaru’s 2016 WRX steps up its tech with Starlink screen, crash avoidance

By Andrew Hard April 23, 2015

From a ‘driver’s car’ standpoint, the Subaru WRX and its mental STI brother are hard to argue against. For under $35,000, you’ll be able to keep up with European sports cars that cost triple the money, with everyday usability and practicality than can give even the most experienced enthusiasts pause.

Where they lack, though, is in their refinement and technology offerings. They’ve made massive strides in recent years, but even the cheaper Volkswagen GTI has the WRX beaten in comfort by a significant margin.

Recommended Videos

For 2016, Subaru took a break from performance and styling to meet this challenge head on. The 268-horsepower WRX, which starts at $26,595, now offers a new, 6.2-inch ‘Starlink’ touchscreen system as standard. The 2015 model offered a 6.1-inch unit with Premium and Limited models only, and to be honest, it needed some work. We’re glad to see Subaru address that.

2016 Subaru WRX — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Buyers can upgrade to a 7.0-inch touchscreen if they wish, which is part of a $2,100 technology package. Also included with Premium and Limited trims, the infotainment unit bundles multi-touch gesture controls, SMS texting, iTunes tagging, and an extra USB port.

Another big addition to the WRX is the ‘EyeSight’ collision mitigation system, now available on the range-topping, $30,395 Limited version. You can only get it with the CVT though, and it comes alongside navigation, blind spot detection, lane change assist, rear cross-traffic alert as well as leather-trimmed upholstery and LED low-beams.

As for the 305-hp WRX STI, there are fewer changes. The entry-level, $34,695 rally car gains the same 6.2-inch touchscreen as the base WRX, and the $40,790 STI Limited similarly features a 7.0-inch unit.

Unique to the STI is a low-profile trunk spoiler that is now available as a no-cost option alongside the big boy racer wing. The car also equips blind spot detection and rear cross-traffic alert for 2016.

As far as the current model goes, we’ve gotten our hands on one. Stay tuned for our full review of the 2015 WRX Premium coming next week.

2016 models will arrive at Subaru dealerships this summer.

Topics

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Andrew first started writing in middle school and hasn't put the pen down since. Whether it's technology, music, sports, or…

Cars

Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders

Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Cars

BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too

BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Cars

Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say

Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.