Skip to main content

2017 Fiat 124 Spider review

One part Mazda and one part Fiat, the new Spider is a charming roadster

2017 Fiat 124 Spider
2017 Fiat 124 Spider
MSRP $24,495.00
“The 2017 Fiat 124 Spider merges Mazda's tech with Fiat's flair to create a charming roadster.”
Pros
  • Proven, light weight sports car chassis
  • Brilliant convertible top design
  • Turbocharged power plant
  • On-track thrills promised from the Abarth model
Cons
  • Somewhat polarizing design
  • Lacking power below 3000 rpm

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Fiat 124 Spider. Although the car has been out of production for more than three decades, Fiat roadster fans have cause for celebration because the Spider returning to the global market this summer as a 2017 model. Despite the fact that the car now carrying the torch bears little mechanical resemblance to the roadster it derives its namesake from, it’s no less compelling than the original, which has the notable distinction of being the best-selling U.S. market Fiat ever.

Recommended Videos

If something looks strangely familiar about the shape and proportions of the Fiat 124 Spider, it may be because this car owes just as much to Japan as it does to Italy. The result of an engineering partnership between Fiat and Mazda, the 124 Spider is built alongside the MX-5 in Hiroshima, and much like the Subaru BRZ and Scion FR-S, the Mazda and Fiat share a platform. But unlike Toyobaru twins, the differences here run deeper than just badging, content and minor tuning tweaks.

But can a sports car with the underpinnings of a Miata capture the essence of that iconic Italian ragtop? With 350 miles between Los Angeles and Pebble Beach, a balmy summer day taking shape, and no shortage of narrow, twisting tarmac at my disposal once I arrived in town for Monterey Car Week, I intended to find out.

Italian style meets Japanese engineering

While there’s a number of nuanced differences between the Mazda MX-5 and the Fiat 124 Spider, the most obvious difference between the pair, from a mechanical standpoint, is that the Fiat does not use Mazda’s naturally aspirated 2.0-liter SkyActiv four cylinder motor. Instead, Fiat has festooned their turbocharged 1.4-liter MultiAir four-pot into the chassis.

The boosted mill outputs 160 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque in the Classica and Lusso trims, while the performance-focused Abarth model gets a unique exhaust system that bumps peak horsepower up to 164. Comparing the 124 Spider Abarth and its Japanese equivalent in MX-5 Club, that’s a difference of nine horsepower and 36 pound-feet of torque. It also means the 124 Spider is the most powerful four cylinder currently available in its class. Considering the fact that Mazda has stated their intention to leave engine output as-is with this generation of the Miata, opting for the 124 may be the easiest path to a more grunt if you find the MX-5 a bit lacking.

If something looks strangely familiar about the Fiat 124 Spider, it may be because this car owes just as much to Japan as it does to Italy.

But the Fiat 124 Spider’s differentiation from the Mazda MX-5 doesn’t simply begin and end at the power plant. Fiat wanted to give this roadster its own character without losing sight of what’s made the Miata a venerable modern-day sports car icon. Every body panel on the 124 Spider is unique to this model, with the design handled at Fiat’s Centro Stile division in Turin, Italy. While similarities in the proportions of the two cars are unavoidable, the Fiat cuts a decidedly more chiseled figure than the smooth, flowing design of the Mazda, and the 124 Spider’s prominent bug-eye-style headlamps and split grille help give the Fiat a unique visual identity.

Along with suspension tuning that’s more aggressive than the MX-5’s across the lineup, there’s also numerous soft-touch leather options exclusive to the 124 in order to provide the interior with a sense of European flare as well. A bespoke gauge cluster and Sport mode are also on hand for the Abarth model.

On the road

While there are efforts to establish a unique identity for the 124 Spider found throughout the car, from behind the wheel none are more obvious than the engine under the hood. The Multi-Air’s personality is a bit more raucous than the relatively understated nature of the naturally aspirated 2.0-liter in the Mazda. Along with its raspy exhaust note – which is particularly prominent in the Abarth model – how the Italian mill delivers the power is substantially different from Mazda’s SkyActiv power plant.

2017 Fiat 124 Spider
Bradley Iger/Digital Trends
Bradley Iger/Digital Trends

Because of the Mutli-Air’s heavy reliance on boost to make power, below 3,000 rpm the motor can feel a bit lethargic, and unsuccessful attempts to get underway from second gear in stop and go traffic during the mania of Monterey Car Week in my manual gearbox-equipped tester drove this notion home. Yet if you’re willing to play by the turbocharged rules, this little car can be a legitimate riot to bomb around in, and its curb weight of under 2500 pounds is a refreshing change of pace from the industry-wide bloat we’ve become accustomed to.

When it goes on sale this summer, the 124 Spider will initially be offered in three trim levels – Classica serves as the entry level offering, while Lusso offers more luxury and tech content and the Abarth model caters to enthusiasts with its focus on performance.

If you’re willing to play by the turbocharged rules, this little car can be a legitimate riot to bomb around in.

Like the Miata, the 124 Spider’s size might seem like a daunting proposition to taller drivers. While it normally wouldn’t be my go-to choice for grand touring duty, my 6’3” frame settled into the 124 comfortably for the five hour drive to Monterey. Although adjustment on the 124’s seats is fairly rudimentary, the overall comfort of these buckets – which differ in construction from the MX-5’s – was admirable considering the lengthy stints behind the wheel.

I also got to know the infotainment system well during our journey together, which is essentially unchanged from Mazda’s implementation in the Miata. Although it lacks some of the latest features like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, the system proved cooperative with my devices and responsive to commands, with a logically laid out and easy to navigate menu system. Inputs can be done either by touchscreen or an iDrive-like pivoting rotary knob and a collection of physical buttons, while basic tasks like volume control, skipping tracks and voice commands can also be done from the steering wheel.

The Bondurant connection

The Fiat 124 Spider gets stiffer suspension tuning than the Mazda across its three trim lines, but it’s unsurprising to learn that the Abarth’s tuning is the most aggressive among them. Serving as a counterpart to the performance-focused MX-5 Club, the Abarth gets Bilstein dampers, bigger wheels with grippier tires, a throatier exhaust system, and the availability of Brembo brakes and Recaro sport seats.

To help drive home the on-track prowess of the Fiat 124 Spider Abarth, Fiat has partnered up with the Bondurant Racing School in Chandler, Arizona, to provide expert performance driving instruction to every new Abarth buyer. Not unlike the SRT Experience offered on high performance Dodge products, Abarth owners will be treated to a day at the purpose built facility learning various high performance driving techniques from Bondurant’s roster of highly skilled instructors, many of which are former professional racers like Bob Bondurant himself. That’s a particularly nice little perk when you consider that even the top-spec Abarth comes in under $30k.

No “wrong” choice

If this has you torn between the MX-5 Club and the 124 Spider Abarth, I can’t say I blame you. Straight-line acceleration is essentially identical between the two cars at about six seconds flat to 60 mph, and while the Abarth undercuts the Club’s price by a few hundred bucks at $28,195, the difference becomes even more negligible when you start considering options like the Brembos and the Recaro seats. Still, the Abarth’s 1.4-liter turbo engine likely provides a bit more performance potential out of the box, yet lacks the linearity of the Mazda’s natural aspiration.

At the end of the day, choosing between a Fiat 124 Spider and a Mazda MX-5 is a subjective exercise – both cars are a blast behind the wheel and offer a genuine performance value along with a surprisingly amount of practicality. Although each cuts a substantially different figure aesthetically, which one is more appealing to the eye comes down to who you ask.

Perhaps the most reassuring takeaway here is that you can’t really go wrong with either one. Whether or not the Fiat suits you more ideally than the Mazda does, the notion of more of these light weight and well-balanced chassis finding their way into production – regardless of the badge on the hood – is a great thing indeed.

Bradley Iger
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Relocating to Los Angeles after competing his undergraduate degree in Rhetorical Studies at the University of California…
Robotaxi aside, a $25,000 EV would be pointless, Tesla CEO says
Blue Tesla Model 3 Highland on the road

Enthusiasts expecting to one day put their hands on the steering wheel of a $25,000 Tesla EV may feel like they’ve been taken for a ride.
CEO Elon Musk has just put a serious damper on those expectations, saying that outside of the driverless Robotaxi recently unveiled by Tesla, a regular $25,000 model would be “pointless” and “silly.”
During a conference call with investors, Musk was asked to clarify whether such a model was in the works.
"Basically, having a regular $25K model is pointless,” Musk said. “It would be silly. It would be completely at odds with what we believe." Tesla, Musk continued, has “been very clear that the future is autonomous.”
On October 10, Tesla unveiled its much-awaited robotaxi, called the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The company also unveiled the Robovan, a much larger autonomous vehicle expected to carry people or goods.
The automaker said the Cybercab is expected to be produced in 2026 and cost $30,000. Musk, meanwhile, said that it would be a $25,000 car without specifying if that price tag included federal tax credits.
Tesla’s ambiguity about an affordable entry-level model has been going on for years. In 2020, Musk signaled that a $25,000 Tesla would arrive within three years. It was later reported that Tesla had ditched the idea, instead favoring the development of a robotaxi.
Language within Tesla’s latest financial report still hints that new affordable Tesla models are on the way. But Musk’s latest comments are putting a floor on just how affordable these would be. So far, Tesla’s Model 3 Rear-Wheel-Drive remains the company’s cheapest model, with a base price of $38,990.
Some rival EV makers, meanwhile, are entering the affordable space more aggressively in the U.S.
General Motors has already put out its Chevy Equinox EV at a price of $27,500, including federal tax credits. Volkswagen America says it plans to release an under-$35,000 EV in the U.S. by 2027.

Read more
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more
Costco partners with Electric Era to bring back EV charging in the U.S.
costco ev charging us electricera fast station 1260x945

Costco, known for its discount gas stations, has left EV drivers in need of juicing up out in the cold for the past 12 years. But that seems about to change now that the big-box retailer is putting its brand name on a DC fast-charging station in Ridgefield, Washington.
After being one of the early pioneers of EV charging in the 1990s, Costco abandoned the offering in 2012 in the U.S.
While opening just one station may seem like a timid move, the speed at which the station was installed -- just seven weeks -- could indicate big plans going forward.
Besides lightening-speed installation, Electric Era, the Seattle-based company making and installing the charging station, promises to offer “hyper-reliable, battery-backed fast charging technology in grid-constrained locations.”
Its stalls can deliver up to 200 kilowatts and come with built-in battery storage, allowing for lower electricity rates and the ability to remain operational even when power grids go down.
If that sounds like it could very well rival Tesla’s SuperCharger network, it’s no coincidence: Quincy Lee, its CEO, is a former SpaceX engineer.
Costco also seems confident enough in the company to have put its brand name on the EV-charging station. Last year, the wholesaler did open a pilot station in Denver, this time partnering with Electrify America, the largest charging network in the U.S. However, Costco did not put its brand name on it.
In an interview with Green Car Reports, Electric Era said it was still in talks with Costco about the opening of new locations. Last year, Costco said it was planning to install fast chargers at 20 locations, without providing further details. It has maintained EV-charging operations in Canada, the UK, Spain, and South Korea.
Meanwhile, the wholesaler’s U.S. EV-charging plans might very well resemble those of rival Walmart, which last year announced it was building its own EV fast-charging network in addition to the arrangements it already had with Electrify America.

Read more