Skip to main content

Is Honda’s 2017 Rebel 500 ABS the perfect second bike for a newbie street rider?

Honda’s 2017 Rebels are a good size for street riders who want a motorcycle to get around town, with occasional short to medium-length trips. The two bikes are exactly alike except for the engines. While the single-cylinder 286cc-engine Rebel 300 could be a great first bike if you’re buying new, the 2017 Honda Rebel 500 ABS is arguably a better setup for a second bike. It could be an ideal bike for a wide cross-section of riders.

The Rebel 500’s 471-cc liquid-cooled parallel twin engine has more power than the 300. The bike also weighs more at 414 pounds compared to the 300’s 370 pounds. We also think the anti-lock brake system (ABS) version of the $6,300 Rebel 500 is worth the extra $300 over the non-ABS version, especially on a bike you may keep for decades.

Recommended Videos

The only downside with the Rebel ABS versions (the same applies to the Rebel 300) is you’re limited to a black paint job. The black looks cool, but so do the red and matte silver metallic versions — the bright yellow may be too much for some riders’ tastes. The other colors are all available with the non-ABS 300s and 500s. The wheels, engines, and exhaust systems have the blacked-out look common on many newer bikes.

The Rebel’s wheelbase is a respectable 58.7-inches. The standard fat tires, 130/90-16 inches up front and 150/80-16 inches in the rear, look right as well. The low 27.2-inch seat height will work for most adult riders, so you won’t be stretching to put both feet on the ground at stop lights.

The Rebel 500’s wheelbase is similar to the Harley-Davidson Iron 883’s 59.6-inch and the Triumph Bonneville T100’s 59.1-inch. The Harley and the Triumph both have larger tires front and rear than the Honda. The 883’s unladen seat is 28.9 inches high, and the T100 seat measures 31.1 inches from the ground.

We’re not saying the Rebel 500 compares to the Iron 883 or the T100 overall. Those modern versions of iconic bikes have engines almost twice the size of the Honda’s. Physically, however, the three bikes aren’t all the much different in size, so if you buy the Rebel you aren’t going to feel like you’re riding on a dinky little bike.

The Rebel 500 ABS won’t be everyone’s favorite second (and maybe lasting) motorcycle. If you really want a cafe racer, a big touring bike, a dual sport on and off road bike, or one of the many “Is-that-a-real-chopper, mister?” models from Honda or other manufacturers, the Rebels’ yell won’t call you. If you spend a lot of time on freeways, chances are you’ll want something heavier for more stability and power.

But if you want a decent-looking, low hassle bike to ride around town, possibly to commute on, and maybe to take on occasional trips, you could do a lot worse than the Rebel 500 ABS. If you decide to add a passenger seat, panniers, a small windscreen, or other accessories, Honda is happy to fix you up.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more