Skip to main content

2018 Jaguar XF S Sportbrake review

Jaguar's stealthy Sportbrake totally reinvents the (wagon) wheel, and we love it

2018 Jaguar XF S Sportbrake Review
Miles Branman/Digital Trends
2018 Jaguar XF S Sportbrake
MSRP $70,450.00
“If you can overlook the Sportbrake’s luxury failings, this is the family hauler to have”
Pros
  • Standout style in the age of SUVs
  • Punchy engine
  • Responsive chassis
  • Generous cargo volume
Cons
  • Aging infotainment with missing features
  • Interior quality feels beneath the asking price

Car shopping is the ultimate process of refinement – though not always through the right steps. Buyers often start with a brand they like or a cool vehicle they’ve seen through advertisements or in a parking lot. If a friend or family member owns the model in question, they can be polled for feedback. Then follows some online research, a dealer visit, and a purchase. Sometimes, this procedure can yield the right car for a given owner. These days, it often leads to an SUV or a crossover when many motorists really belong in a wagon.

Recommended Videos

With better fuel economy, a more comfortable ride, better handling, and similar cargo capacity, wagons shouldn’t be overlooked in the age of SUVs. Thankfully, automakers are once again producing great wagons (some never stopped), giving consumers compelling reasons to make the switch.

Within the luxury sector, Mercedes-Benz has held down the long-roofed fort with its E400 4Matic+ Wagon ($63,050), but Porsche’s Panamera 4 Sport Turismo ($96,200) and Jaguar’s XF S Sportbrake ($70,450) came to play. We’ve spent some time in the hottest version of Porsche’s wagon and Mercedes-AMG’s family hauler, but this is our first crack at Jaguar’s one-size-fits-all wagon.

The Sportbrake isn’t just cool to car people. Of all the folks who ogled the Jag wagon while we held the keys (and there were many), only a couple drove what we’d consider enthusiast vehicles. More often, someone would roll down the window to their Ford Fusion or pause on the way back to their Lexus RX to dish a compliment to the Sportbrake. It makes sense; this wagon deserves attention.

Interior and tech

Jaguar’s interior design has its strengths and weaknesses. Clean lines and uncluttered surfaces make for an elegant dashboard. There’s leather where we want it (on the steering wheel, seats, center console, and door armrests), a full-length panoramic glass roof, and a microfiber suede headliner. Alas, the overall experience is “premium-lite” (and you can’t pay to upgrade this service).

Lesson one: the Sportbrake isn’t just cool to car people.

Our biggest concern is the fit and finish of the cabin materials. The perforated leather seats aren’t molded into a welcoming design, the trim pieces feel sub-standard for a $70,000 luxury car, and, apart from the trick gear selector and air vents that “wake” upon startup, we’re missing any real “dazzle” to match the car’s provocative silhouette.

2018 Jaguar XF S Sportbrake Review
Miles Branman/Digital Trends

Technology, too, is a mixed bag. Jaguar’s 12.3-inch digital driver display and 10-inch infotainment system provide clear visuals and extensive customization, but the absence of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto is a big whiff in 2018 (for any segment of the market). The InControl Touch Pro module features a tiled design to shortcut common functions like audio, navigation, climate control, and Bluetooth calling. Other settings require a little more legwork, and the system’s delayed response to inputs can get frustrating. We can’t claim to prefer Mercedes-Benz’s confusing Comand infotainment, but Porsche’s slick system is more intuitive and faster than Jag’s setup. Audi’s MMI Touch Response is, too.

The interior experience is merely “premium-lite” (and you can’t pay to upgrade this service).

The mix of controls on the steering wheel, center stack, and touchscreen suit driver preferences, and an available head-up display helps reduce distraction. Standard driver aids include blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alerts, front and rear parking sensors, and lane keeping assist as standard. An optional driver assistance package adds adaptive cruise control, a 360-degree camera, traffic sign recognition, and parking assistance.

Convenience highlights include available heated and cooled front seats, heated rear seats, four-zone climate control, a Wi-Fi hotspot, and an 825-watter Meridian surround sound system. Passenger space is excellent, with full-size adults fitting comfortably on the rear bench. Though the glass roof can’t be opened like a traditional sunroof, the added light improves cabin ambiance. With the rear seats in place, Jaguar’s XF Sportbrake affords 32 cubic feet of space, second only to the E400 Wagon (35 cu. ft.) in the premium wagon segment. With the rear seats folded, its total 70 cu. ft. is best-in-class.

Driving experience

Performance SUVs are forced to defy the physics of their high centers of gravity, but a wagon must only manage its additional mass. If Jaguar can make the F-Pace handle gracefully, then the sedan-height Sportbrake should be nothing short of brilliant in a corner.

2018 Jaguar XF S Sportbrake Review
Miles Branman/Digital Trends

Indeed it is. Jaguar’s rear-biased all-wheel drive system and fine-tuned chassis are more than a match for the XF wagon’s 275 extra pounds compared to the sedan. The Sportbrake predictably and confidently claws its way around corners while the electronic steering system does an excellent impression of unassisted feedback. Turn in is sharp and steering weight — while heftier than both the Panamera and E400 — is never anchored.

Second only to the Sportbrake’s physique is its finesse.

Once the Jag sees corner exit, its 3.0-liter supercharged V6 gets busy sending 380 horsepower and 332 pound-feet of torque to the four wheels via a ZF eight-speed automatic transmission. Whether in drive or sport mode, the Sportbrake doesn’t hold back its aggression, though sport tees up the transmission and throttle for urgency. Alternatively, an eco mode deflates throttle response and nudges the transmission to a higher gear in an effort to save fuel.

Jaguar’s has used ZF’s eight-speed unit for a number of years now, and while it’s still a solid gearbox (especially in full automatic mode), it’s beginning to show some age. Manual shifts of the steering wheel-mounted paddles take that extra fraction of a second to register compared to the latest units from Mercedes-Benz and Porsche. It’s a subtle distinction, but one that encourages us to leave the shifting to the computer.

When the pace slows, the XF S Sportbrake affords luxury-grade ride smoothness with the help of its adaptive suspension dampers. Even with dynamic drive mode engaged, Jag’s wagon keeps the cabin free of jarring movements from bumps and potholes. No amount of casual motoring will save owners from the Sportbrake’s thirsty motor, however. Despite its modest weight gain, the wagon loses two combined mpg to the XF sedan, for a 21 mpg average. City and highway ratings are 18 and 25 mpg, respectively. Mercedes-Benz’s E400 Wagon doesn’t see a higher combined estimate than the Jag, but Porsche’s Panamera 4 Sport Turismo bests its rivals by two mpg.

Warranty

Jaguar’s warranty coverage is generous by all measures. While Mercedes-Benz and Porsche only offer four years or 50,000 miles of limited protection (without free scheduled maintenance), Jaguar covers its owners for five years or 60,000 miles and includes scheduled maintenance for the entire term. Jag extends its powertrain warranty a year beyond its competitors as well. Historically, Jaguar vehicles are something of a joke in terms of reliability, and though predicted reliability is far higher than ever before, German luxury brands consistently score better on reliability tests.

How DT would configure this car

Customizing our ideal XF Sportbrake is a fairly streamlined process given the car’s single powertrain, drivetrain, and transmission configuration. The Firenze red of our tester certainly pops, but we prefer the caesium blue ($565) on gloss black painted 20-inch split-spoke wheels ($1,020) with the black exterior trim pack ($360). Inside, the dark brown (brogue) leather would pair best with grey figured ebony trim. We’d tack on a few convenience goodies too. The comfort and convenience package ($1,805) brings with it heated a cooled front seats and soft-close doors. The aforementioned driver assistance kit ($3,495) is a must, as is the technology package’s ($3,265) Wi-Fi hotspot, navigation, digital instrument cluster, and upgraded sound system.

Our Take

Thank goodness Jaguar builds this car. The XF S Sportbrake is practical, striking, and engaging – all words that describe the company’s compact SUV, but carry deeper meaning for its midsize wagon. A lofty price tag puts the Sportbrake out of reach for some shoppers, but those who can plop down $70,000 will get one of the most practical conversation pieces you can buy today. Let wagons back into your hearts, people!

If not for the Jag wagon’s strong competitors, we’d probably overlook its luxury missteps in awe of its style and speed. However, both the Porsche Panamera 4 Sport Turismo and Mercedes-Benz E400 Wagon offer more sumptuous cabins and tactile quality. The Porsche’s sky-high price tag will put it out of the running for most, but the Mercedes-Benz’s lower starting figure (before the options list runs rampant) makes for an attractive buy. One shouldn’t overlook Jaguar’s free scheduled maintenance (worth at least a grand or two after five years), but the Mercedes is less likely to encounter as many issues in the long run.

Should you get one?

For the money, Mercedes-Benz’s E-Class Wagon is a better buy (but we might just ignore logic and take the Jag).

Miles Branman
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Miles Branman doesn't need sustenance; he needs cars. While the gearhead gene wasn't strong in his own family, Miles…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more