Skip to main content

2018 Mini Countryman S E ALL4 review

It's a big Mini you can plug in. But there's still plenty of room for fun

2018 mini countryman s e all4 review plug in hybrid 10
Image used with permission by copyright holder
2018 Mini Countryman S E ALL4
MSRP $36,900.00
“Shockingly big on size but short on range, the Cooper S E Countryman ALL4 doesn’t want to stray from the city.”
Pros
  • Drive on gas, electric, or both
  • Fun to whip up around mountain roads
  • Instant torque
  • Space efficient and comfortable
Cons
  • Limited driving range
  • High price premium

It has been eons since Minis actually lived up to their namesake, and that’s one of the first things you notice about the Mini Countryman: It is anything but Mini.

Recommended Videos

A much, larger “crossover” version of the standard Cooper with two extra doors, the Countryman is the biggest and most practical Mini to ever sport the famed badge. Add a plug-in hybrid powertrain and you get this model: the Cooper S E Countryman ALL4.

Although seemingly a paradox on four wheels, the larger Countryman doesn’t stray far from the company’s tradition. During the ‘60s heyday of the iconic and truly small Morris Mini-Minor, the company also expanded its lineup with larger versions. And right now, Mini parent BMW Group is on a tear to add electric versions of just about everything.

In base form, the Cooper Countryman competes with the Audi Q3, and the Mercedes-Benz GLA. But because of its hybrid status, the Countryman S E ALL4 actually remains as the only car in its class with a plug-in hybrid powertrain. Is it worth the buzz, starting at $36,900?

Interior and tech

Despite their small footprints, Minis were always incredibly space efficient, being able to fit more inside than what meets the eye on the outside. Though much larger, the Countryman S E ALL4 retains that efficiency. Thanks to its upright and boxy profile, the Countryman is very easy to get in and out of, both in the front and rear, for full size adults. Once settled inside, the high roofline yields a very spacious and airy cabin, with plenty of space for five. Its gas competitors, the Audi Q3 and Mercedes-Benz GLA, all feel terribly cramped in comparison.

Because the Countryman is also a BMW plug-in hybrid underneath, technology is a big focus on the inside. The infotainment system lives front and center, inside a circular ring inspired by Mini’s iconic dashboards of yore. The speedometer and other gauges that used to live here have been moved behind the steering wheel.

Minis were always incredibly space efficient, being able to fit more inside than what meets the eye on the outside.

The screen runs Mini Connected, an on-board app suite that displays overall vehicle functions and the operation of the hybrid system. It also collects data based on your driving habits and reports it back to you, and all in the hopes that it can encourage you to become a more fuel-efficient driver. This is a hybrid after all, and that’s one of the Countryman SE ALL4’s missions.

Apple CarPlay is available as part of the basic Touchscreen Navigation Package, but if you want you want parking assist, active cruise control, and parking distance sensors, you’ll need to spring for the $1,250 Driver Assistance Package.

The dashboard layout and overall interior design seem well-thought out and fun, particularly with quirky touches like airplane-style rocker switches on the lower portion of the center console. But the materials seem a tad bit on the cheap, plasticky side for a car that can cost well north of $40,000.

2018-Mini-Countryman-E-S-Plug-In-Hybrid-review
Chris Chin/Digital Trends

Driving experience

Unlike larger and taller crossovers that drive more like SUVs, the Countryman drives like a tall wagon with just a tad bit of extra ground clearance. So rest assured, the Mini won’t bore you behind the wheel if you decide to tear up some backroads, or if you want to test your rear occupants’ tolerance to G-forces.  The fun-to-drive factor also makes it clear that BMW is more than a mere corporate parent, as Munich’s influence is written all over the Countryman. Settle down to normal driving and the Countryman does much better to absorb road imperfections than its smaller siblings.

The Mini won’t bore you behind the wheel if you decide to tear up some backroads.

Mash the gas and the Countryman S E ALL 4 jolts around quite a lot quicker than its 1.5-liter three-cylinder hybrid powertrain suggests on paper. Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised: This is, after all, the same turbocharged 1.5-liter TwinPower three-cylinder used in the i8 sports car, but in a detuned state. It powers the front axle while the additional electric motor powers the rear axle for a total of 221 horsepower and 284 pound-feet of torque. According to official test figures from in-house, the Countryman PHEV hits 60 in just 6.7 seconds.

The gas motor itself churns out 134 horses of those 221 and 162 of those 284 torques. But it’s the instant-on electric wallop that really allows the Countryman to feel like there’s a much bigger engine under the hood. On the road, it’s quite astonishing.

Should you want to shun gasoline entirely, flick the eDrive rocker switch and the Countryman will rely entirely on the small 7.6 kWh battery to power the electric motor. Mini says it will run on electric up to 77 mph and on a good day, 24 miles of range. Then, the gas engine comes in to operate like a hybrid, making the Countryman S E ALL4 only good for a total driving range of 270 miles. On both fronts, those are rather limited driving ranges.  Engineers had to shrink the size of the gas tank to fit the rather equally small battery pack to power the electric motor.

And this is where the Countryman begins to come up short. Errand runs around North New Jersey were enough to deplete the electric capacity and kick us into hybrid mode before we returned home with groceries. And any sort of public charging station was at least a five-mile route deviation from any of my destinations, given my living quarters doesn’t have charging options available. But it might fare better in other scenarios. Access to charging, and a stop-and-go commute between Brooklyn and Manhattan would make better use of the Countryman’s hybrid system.

Otherwise, the EPA rates the Countryman S E ALL4 at a combined city/highway rating of 65 mpg.

Warranty

All Minis come with a four-year, 50,000-mile warranty from bumper to bumper for all non-wear items.

How DT would configure this car

Though we reviewed the plug-in hybrid Countryman, we’d recommend just sticking with the all-gas engine if you do a lot of long distance driving outside the metropolitan city area. Get the Countryman S ALL4 for $5,000 cheaper, or even the front-wheel drive model if you don’t need all-paw traction. The S model adds a hint of sportiness to the mix with different suspension and tuning, and is worth the $2,500 upgrade.

Rounding the package out would be the top-spec “Iconic” trim over the base “Classic” and mid-grade “Signature” models, adding standard options like various trim upgrades, dual-zone automatic climate control, and tech upgrades like LED headlights and Apple CarPlay.

Our Take

The Mini Countryman S E ALL4 is an expensive proposition for personal intercity transport, where most people don’t even own a car because it’s already expensive and challenging to park and insure. Thus, the Countryman S E ALL4 only targets itself towards a very niche group of city dwellers looking for a large intercity family car with plug-in hybrid capabilities. At that, it succeeds, but beyond, it’s comes up just a bit short.

Should you get one?

Unless you live deep in the downtown neighborhood of a major city or in one of the nearby outlying neighborhoods of the center by 24 miles, and with access to charging infrastructure, just stick with the all-gas version. You really aren’t going to find the plug-in hybrid system useful and worth paying a huge premium for in the entire Countryman lineup. Thankfully, there are state and federal tax breaks that the Countryman S E ALL4 qualifies for. But even with assistance from gas power, it’s limited to 270 miles at best, meaning you’ll find yourself filling up quite often if you do any long-distance driving.

Chris Chin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Since picking up his first MicroMachine, Chris Chin knew his passion for automobiles was embedded into his soul. Based in…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more