Skip to main content

2020 Toyota 86 Hakone Edition review: Cheap thrills

The 2020 Toyota 86 Hakone Edition.
2020 Toyota 86 Hakone Edition review: Cheap thrills
MSRP $28.00
“With a lightweight, agile chassis, Toyota's small sports car offers more fun for your money.”
Pros
  • More powerful than the competition
  • Nimble handling
  • Comfortable cockpit
  • Decently practical
Cons
  • Lack of driver-assist tech
  • Unpleasant exhaust note

The term “sports car” has become synonymous with “expensive.” What was once a source of cheap thrills in the 1940s and 1950s is now a status symbol. A Porsche 911 can crest six figures with options, and a Chevrolet Corvette is considered a bargain at nearly $60,000.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

Recommended Videos

Affordable sports cars still exist, if you know where to look. On paper, the 2020 Toyota 86 (pronounced “eight-six”) has everything you need for driving fun: An agile chassis, eager engine, available manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive. The little Toyota (and its Subaru BRZ sibling) provides some much-needed competition to the Mazda MX-5 Miata, which has dominated this space for over two decades.

Is the 86 as tasty as its ingredients suggest? To find out, we grabbed the leather-swathed key fob to a 2020 Toyota 86 Hakone Edition. Named after a famous Japanese road, it’s distinguished by green paint, bronze wheels, and tan seats. The Hakone Edition is priced at $30,825, compared to $28,015 for the base 86.

Design and interior

The Toyota 86 is a car of many names. It was co-developed with Subaru, which, as noted, sells its own version called the BRZ. Toyota’s version launched in the United States for the 2013 model year as the Scion FR-S, under the Japanese automaker’s now-defunct youth brand. When Scion was axed, the FR-S became the 86. The car hasn’t changed much over the years, though. The new-for-2020 Hakone Edition gets cosmetic changes only.

2020 Toyota 86 Hakone Edition
Stephen Edelstein/Digital Trends

The name “86” is a reference to the 1986 AE86-model Toyota Corolla, but the two cars are very different. The AE86 was a tuner-friendly version of Toyota’s ubiquitous compact car, later made famous in the manga and anime “Initial D.” The 86, on the other hand, is a pure sports car. The two Toyotas do share one important thing, though: rear-wheel drive, which bestows superior handling. The 86 also uses a Subaru boxer engine, which helps lower the car’s center of gravity, further improving cornering ability.

Outward visibility is excellent, so you can place the car easily on the road and don’t have to grit your teeth while parallel parking.

In size and price, the 86 most closely matches the Mazda MX-5 Miata and its sibling, the Fiat 124 Spider. While the Mazda and Fiat are two-seat convertibles, however, the Toyota is a fixed-roof coupe with two tiny back seats. Those seats aren’t really suitable for humans, but they do add a useful amount of cargo space.

Toyota does not reveal trunk space for the 86, but Subaru quotes 6.9 cubic feet for the identical BRZ — more if you fold the rear seats down. That’s not much, but it’s more than you get in a Miata or 124 Spider. The Mazda and Fiat offer fractionally more headroom and a couple of inches of additional legroom, but unless you are as compact as they are, all of these cars will be a tight fit.

2020 Toyota 86 Hakone Edition
Stephen Edelstein/Digital Trends

The 86 interior itself is plain but functional. The seats have thick bolsters, but are still comfortable enough for everyday use. The steering wheel is the perfect diameter and thickness, and the upright dashboard makes the cockpit feel a bit more spacious. Outward visibility is excellent, so you can place the car easily on the road and don’t have to grit your teeth while parallel parking. Materials aren’t fancy, but that is to be expected at this price.

Tech, infotainment, and driver assist

The simplicity of the 86 recalls classic sports cars, but so does its lack of tech. The car comes standard with a 7.0-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto — but that’s about it. The center console has just enough room for a smartphone, but plugging it in requires snaking a USB cable around the shifter.

Stephen Edelstein/Digital Trends

Even the federally mandated rear view camera gets a low-tech execution. Images are shown on a tiny section of the rear view mirror, not on the main screen, or across the entire length of the mirror, as some automakers have done.

You get a bit more with the Toyota’s Subaru BRZ sibling. To justify a slightly higher purchase price, Subaru offers built-in navigation and a few more audio options, including Pandora and SiriusXM.

This is a car you can have fun in without risking jail time.

The 86 also doesn’t get the Toyota Safety Sense 2.0 bundle of driver aids that is standard equipment on most of the automaker’s other models. That means buyers miss out on features like adaptive cruise control and autonomous emergency braking.

The Mazda MX-5 Miata isn’t available with adaptive cruise control either, but autonomous emergency braking, blind spot monitoring, and traffic sign recognition are available. The Fiat 124 Spider gets blind spot monitoring and rear cross traffic alert as part of an optional package, but none of the other driver aids from its Mazda sibling.

Driving experience

The 86 wasn’t designed to be a tech leader. It was designed to offer the best possible driving experience for the price, and it does deliver.

Like a well-crafted cheeseburger, Toyota (and partner Subaru) didn’t try to make the 86 fancy — they focused on making a handful of basic ingredients as good as possible. The 86 is powered by a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine sourced from Subaru that uses Toyota’s D-4S fuel-injection system, which toggles between direct injection and port injection to maximize efficiency. The engine has Subaru’s signature boxer configuration, which allows it to sit lower in the chassis. That lowers the car’s overall center of gravity, improving handling.

The boxer-four produces 205 horsepower and 156 pound-feet of torque in cars with the six-speed manual transmission, and 200 hp and 151 lb.-ft. with the six-speed automatic. That’s more than you get in the Mazda MX-5 Miata or Fiat 124 Spider, although the 86 can’t match the Fiat’s melodious exhaust note. The engine is also well -uited to sports-car duty, with an eager, rev-happy character.

Stephen Edelstein/Digital Trends

The 86’s trim proportions, relatively low curb weight (Toyota quoted a 2,799-pound weight for our Hakone Edition test car), and rear-wheel drive make the most of that engine. Many performance cars try to mask poundage with an extra dollop of power, meaning most of the fun happens at extralegal speed. The 86’s agile and communicative chassis makes every corner into an event—no matter the speed. This is a car you can have fun in without risking jail time.

The 86 isn’t perfect — it’s easy to accidentally grab fifth gear when you want third, and a Miata is a tad sharper overall — but it’s pretty close. You also pay for that epic handling with ride quality that will make highway commuting painful. The suspension does nothing to lessen the impact of bumps, and the cabin is noisy. If you want more refinement, you’ll have to trade up to a Toyota Supra.

Gas mileage and safety

Another benefit of a light car with a small engine is good gas mileage. The 86 is rated at 24 mpg combined (21 mpg city, 28 mpg highway) with the manual transmission, and 27 mpg combined (24 mpg city, 32 mpg highway) with the automatic. Over a week of driving, we averaged 24.2 mpg (according to car’s trip computer), even with a fairly heavy throttle foot.

Real world results that match government ratings are always encouraging, but the 86 can’t match a manual-transmission Miata’s 29 mpg combined (26 mpg city, 34 mpg highway) or a manual 124 Spider’s 30 mpg (26 mpg city, 35 mpg highway). The Mazda has a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine like the Toyota, while the Fiat has a smaller, turbocharged 1.4-liter four-cylinder.

A benefit of a light car with a small engine is good gas mileage.

The 86 received the top “good” score in four of five Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) crash tests, and was rated “acceptable” in the driver’s side small overlap front test. The Toyota has not received an overall rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Toyota offers a three-year, 36,000-mile basic warranty, and a five-year, 60,000-mile powertrain warranty. The automaker has a fairly good reputation for reliability. Subaru engines have a great reputation as well, although head gaskets are known to fail with high mileage. Replacements should be considered later in the car’s life.

How DT would configure this car

Hakone Edition models like our test car have unique style, and are likely a good bet for future collectibility. However, our ideal 86 would be a base model equipped with the optional TRD Handling Package, which isn’t available on the Hakone Edition.

TRD stands for Toyota Racing Development, the Japanese automaker’s performance division. Selecting this option means ditching the Hakone Edition’s snazzy green paint and 17-inch bronze wheels, but it adds Sachs dampers, Brembo brakes, and 18-inch wheels with stickier Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires. The package costs $2,320, so added to the car’s $28,015 base price, it would still come out slightly cheaper than a Hakone Edition — but with even better handling.

The 86 also has great aftermarket support. If there is something you don’t like about this car, an aftermarket part probably exists to change it. We’d start with a new exhaust system. The stock system makes a lot of noise, but most of that noise isn’t good.

Our take

Few cars perform their intended function as well as the 2020 Toyota 86. A Mazda MX-5 Miata is a tad better to drive, but it’s not something the average driver will notice. The 86 also makes up for that with a pinch of practicality  — and how often are you going to put the Mazda’s top down, really? The Fiat 124 Spider has a nice sound, retro styling, and a more comfortable ride, but it isn’t as sharp as the Toyota.

Toyota paid a price for its singular focus, however. For similar money, you can get cars that aren’t as pure as the 86, but have a greater breadth of talents. The Nissan 370Z boasts a 3.7-liter V6 with 332 horsepower, while sport compacts like the Honda Civic Si and Volkswagen Golf GTI offer everyday practicality. A Ford Mustang EcoBoost offers more space, power, and tech, but it also feels more like an ordinary car than a true sports car.

Should you get one?

Yes. The 86 defines cheap thrills.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Robotaxi aside, a $25,000 EV would be pointless, Tesla CEO says
Blue Tesla Model 3 Highland on the road

Enthusiasts expecting to one day put their hands on the steering wheel of a $25,000 Tesla EV may feel like they’ve been taken for a ride.
CEO Elon Musk has just put a serious damper on those expectations, saying that outside of the driverless Robotaxi recently unveiled by Tesla, a regular $25,000 model would be “pointless” and “silly.”
During a conference call with investors, Musk was asked to clarify whether such a model was in the works.
"Basically, having a regular $25K model is pointless,” Musk said. “It would be silly. It would be completely at odds with what we believe." Tesla, Musk continued, has “been very clear that the future is autonomous.”
On October 10, Tesla unveiled its much-awaited robotaxi, called the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The company also unveiled the Robovan, a much larger autonomous vehicle expected to carry people or goods.
The automaker said the Cybercab is expected to be produced in 2026 and cost $30,000. Musk, meanwhile, said that it would be a $25,000 car without specifying if that price tag included federal tax credits.
Tesla’s ambiguity about an affordable entry-level model has been going on for years. In 2020, Musk signaled that a $25,000 Tesla would arrive within three years. It was later reported that Tesla had ditched the idea, instead favoring the development of a robotaxi.
Language within Tesla’s latest financial report still hints that new affordable Tesla models are on the way. But Musk’s latest comments are putting a floor on just how affordable these would be. So far, Tesla’s Model 3 Rear-Wheel-Drive remains the company’s cheapest model, with a base price of $38,990.
Some rival EV makers, meanwhile, are entering the affordable space more aggressively in the U.S.
General Motors has already put out its Chevy Equinox EV at a price of $27,500, including federal tax credits. Volkswagen America says it plans to release an under-$35,000 EV in the U.S. by 2027.

Read more
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more
Costco partners with Electric Era to bring back EV charging in the U.S.
costco ev charging us electricera fast station 1260x945

Costco, known for its discount gas stations, has left EV drivers in need of juicing up out in the cold for the past 12 years. But that seems about to change now that the big-box retailer is putting its brand name on a DC fast-charging station in Ridgefield, Washington.
After being one of the early pioneers of EV charging in the 1990s, Costco abandoned the offering in 2012 in the U.S.
While opening just one station may seem like a timid move, the speed at which the station was installed -- just seven weeks -- could indicate big plans going forward.
Besides lightening-speed installation, Electric Era, the Seattle-based company making and installing the charging station, promises to offer “hyper-reliable, battery-backed fast charging technology in grid-constrained locations.”
Its stalls can deliver up to 200 kilowatts and come with built-in battery storage, allowing for lower electricity rates and the ability to remain operational even when power grids go down.
If that sounds like it could very well rival Tesla’s SuperCharger network, it’s no coincidence: Quincy Lee, its CEO, is a former SpaceX engineer.
Costco also seems confident enough in the company to have put its brand name on the EV-charging station. Last year, the wholesaler did open a pilot station in Denver, this time partnering with Electrify America, the largest charging network in the U.S. However, Costco did not put its brand name on it.
In an interview with Green Car Reports, Electric Era said it was still in talks with Costco about the opening of new locations. Last year, Costco said it was planning to install fast chargers at 20 locations, without providing further details. It has maintained EV-charging operations in Canada, the UK, Spain, and South Korea.
Meanwhile, the wholesaler’s U.S. EV-charging plans might very well resemble those of rival Walmart, which last year announced it was building its own EV fast-charging network in addition to the arrangements it already had with Electrify America.

Read more