Skip to main content

Are self-driving cars the death of car ownership?

Tesla Cybercab at night
Tesla

Self-driving cars are coming. It remains to be seen how long that will take. Plenty of vehicles can more or less drive themselves on highways, but for now, they still can’t completely reliably drive themselves on all streets, in all conditions, taking into account all different variables. One thing is clear, though: the tech industry sees autonomous driving as the future of personal transportation, and they’re spending billions to reach that goal.

But what happens when we get there? Tesla made headlines for not only announcing its new Cybercab fully autonomous vehicle, but simultaneously claiming that customers will be able to buy one. That’s right, at least if Tesla is to be believed, the Cybercab doesn’t necessarily represent Tesla building its own Uber-killing fleet of self-driving cars, but instead giving people the ownership over the self-driving car industry.

Recommended Videos

Setting aside the fact that Tesla seems to constantly make claims that don’t pan out, the announcement begs the question: Will self-driving cars kill the concept of personal vehicle ownership in the long run?

Power to the people

The model that Tesla is seemingly pursuing essentially puts your own self-driving vehicle in your driveway. The benefits of that are clear — whenever you want or need, whether planned or on a whim, step outside and go.

Full Self Driving demonstrated from Tesla.
Tesla

That, of course, is no different from owning a car today — it’s just that when you get into that car, you can watch TV instead of having to steer. But owning a self-driving car could have different implications. What if, when you’re not driving the car you own, it’s driving itself?

“I believe that, for many people, owning a self-driving car will be a really attractive option,” said John Ellmore, a spokesperson for Electric Car Guide, in an interview with Digital Trends. “There will always be people who prefer the freedom that comes with having their own car.”

The advantages of that could be very meaningful. It could, basically, mean that you own an Uber vehicle that you don’t have to be in. When you’re asleep at night, your car could be driving people around town, and making you money, without you having to do anything. You could potentially even buy many Cybercabs, and own your own fleet of self-driving cars.

A Hyundai Ioniq 5 is equipped as a robotaxi.
Waymo

Even that could at least reduce car ownership. After all, rates for rides are likely to be a whole lot lower than they are now — mainly because a driver won’t be required. They’ll still need to cover the cost of charging, average wear and tear, and, of course, a little extra for the owner of the car. But with much lower ride fees, more and more people might choose to forgo ownership.

Land grab

Many experts predict a different outcome, though, at least in the long run. The concept is simple — why own a car when you can summon a cheap ride whenever you want?

If that’s the route that we go long-term, it could have massive implications for our cities. Charging and parking locations could be moved to outside of cities, freeing up tons of space inside of cities. Driveways could go away, allowing for more space for housing. All of a sudden, that driveway and garage you have taking up space could be converted into room for an expanded home or a larger yard.

Tesla Cybercab side profile
Tesla

“In the long term, self-driving cars will end up like today’s ridesharing services, but far more efficient,” continued Ellmore. “Instead of every household owning one or two cars, then people will join membership-based services where autonomous cars arrive when you need them, like a taxi service — meaning you wont need to worry about parking, maintenance, or insurance.”

That vision is nowhere near reality yet, and it’s unlikely that all of a sudden we’ll wake up one day in a world without car ownership. A change like this would take years, if not decades, as owned cars slowly go out of commission, and perceptions around the need to own your vehicle shift.

A likely outcome

The likely reality? A combination of the two. In the near-term, we’re still going to buy our cars. People still want to be able to hop in a car whenever they want, and massive self-driving rideshare services won’t just pop up overnight. For many, a service like that would need to be perfect, with near-instant access and more than enough rides at all times, before it’s usable. Many see their car as their freedom — especially in areas with limited public transportation.

But in the long-term, it’s entirely possible that car ownership could start to dwindle, and eventually die. Those massive subscriptions will pop up, starting in dense cities and growing from there. We’ve already seen that — services like Waymo have started growing in popularity and their service areas have expanded. Brave users in cities like San Francisco, who don’t travel much, could theoretically do away with their car right now, relying on Waymo at home and car rentals forthose few out-of-town trips.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
I reviewed an electric car like it was a phone, and I came to a shocking conclusion
The front of the Cupra Born VZ.

The Cupra Born VZ is not a smartphone — it’s an electric car. Yet, during my time driving it over the last five days, it has reminded me more than once about the device I spend most of my time using and reviewing.

This is not a put-down, nor is it a comment on electric versus combustion-engine vehicles, but more about how I, someone who doesn’t professionally review cars, can still easily recognize what’s good and bad about it. What’s more, the categories I usually break phone reviews down into, and the language I regularly use to talk about them, also neatly applies to the Born VZ.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more