Skip to main content

Redesigned Audi A7 Sportback refines a familiar shape, and a ton of new tech

The first-generation Audi A7 was one of the brand’s biggest styling hits. Sporting a distinct sloping roofline, it proved hatchbacks can be cool. But now Audi is faced with the task of upgrading and refreshing that signature style.

Like most recent Audis, the second-generation 2019 A7 Sportback is more evolutionary than revolutionary. The new model sports muscular flared fenders, a more aggressive front fascia, and a dramatic-looking taillight structure, but it still has the same familiar shape as the last A7. You know what they say about fixing things that aren’t broken?

Recommended Videos

The changes are more significant under the skin. The new A7 will be offered exclusively with mild-hybrid powertrains, pairing internal-combustion engines with a 48-volt electrical system and a lithium-ion battery pack. While the A7 won’t be able to drive for significant distances on electric power alone, it will have the ability to harvest electricity through regenerative braking, and coast for short periods with its engine off. Going mild hybrid also allows for a more aggressive engine start-stop system, which Audi claims will save more fuel than previous systems.

The only powertrain available at launch will be a 3.0-liter turbocharged V6, teamed with the mild-hybrid system, a seven-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive. Under Audi’s questionable new naming system, this model will be known as the A7 55 TFSI. The engine produces 340 horsepower and 368 pound-feet of torque, and acts on its own to propel the car. Audi claims a 0-to-62 mph time of 5.3 seconds and a top speed of 155 mph, but with 34.6 mpg (albeit on the wildly optimistic European testing cycle).

Electrification isn’t the only high-tech trick the A7 has up its sleeve. The body is made from a mix of aluminum and steel to save weight, and the A7 is available with four-wheel steering for the first time. At low speeds, the rear wheels steer in the opposite direction of the front wheels to improve maneuverability, while all four wheels steer in the same direction at higher speeds to improve stability.

The A7 will also be available with a plethora of driver-assist systems under the Audi AI moniker. Similar to Tesla’s Summon feature, it will be able to park itself without a driver onboard, although the feature won’t be available until late 2018. An adaptive cruise-control system that can provide steering inputs to center the car in its lane will also be on the menu, along with an “efficiency assistant” that coaches the driver into saving fuel. Depending on the model, the A7 can be equipped with up to five radar units, five cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and a laser scanner, Audi says.

On the infotainment front, the A7 features Audi’s MMI system with a display split into a 10.1-inch upper screen and 8.6-inch lower screen, with the latter handling climate control and text input. Audi’s Virtual Cockpit is also available, replacing the gauge cluster with a 12.3-inch screen. The A7 can also “talk” to other cars through Car-to-X services, which utilizes what Audi describes as “swarm intelligence” to learn about road hazards.

The new Audi A7 goes in sale in Germany in late February 2018 U.S. sales will begin later in the year, making the A7 a 2019 model. In Germany, the A7 will start at 67,800 euros ($80,237). U.S. pricing won’t be revealed until closer to its arrival on this side of the Atlantic.

Updated: Added live photos and U.S. launch information

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more