Skip to main content

Bentley Continental GT and GTC Speed get performance boost as plug-in hybrids

Front three quarter view of the new Bentley Continental GT Speed coupe.
Bentley

A few years ago, Bentley set off on a path to electrification that was paved with plug-in hybrids and added models like the Bentayga Hybrid to its lineup. However, that path was more of a parallel side road, with plug-in hybrids augmenting the lineup rather than replacing traditional gasoline-only models. Now they’re heading for the fast lane.

Unveiled Tuesday, the fourth-generation Bentley Continental GT Speed coupe and GTC Speed convertible are the most powerful Bentley road cars ever — and they’re plug-in hybrids. These performance models herald a new era for the Continental GT, Bentley’s signature vehicle, along with its GTC convertible variant.

Recommended Videos

The last Continental GT and GTC Speed used a 6.0-liter twin-turbocharged W12, but that’s been replaced with what Bentley calls the Ultra Performance Hybrid powertrain where a 4.0-liter twin-turbocharged V8 is teamed with an electric motor housed in an eight-speed dual-clutch transmission. Together, they produce 771 horsepower and 738 pound-feet of torque. That represents increases of 19% and 11%, respectively, over the non-hybrid powertrain. Bentley estimates a zero-to-60 mph speed of 3.1 seconds, with a top speed of 208 mph in hybrid mode and 87 mph in electric mode.

A 25.9-kilowatt-hour battery pack provides up to 50 miles of electric range based on the EU testing procedure (expect a lower number from the testing cycle used in the United States). The pack is mounted behind the rear axle to improve weight distribution. The added weight of the pack will also likely be less noticeable in the Continental, which has always been more of a fast ocean liner than a racing yacht. An onboard AC charger deliver 11 kilowatts of peak power, allowing for a full recharge in just under three hours, but Bentley hasn’t discussed DC fast-charging availability.

The all-wheel drive Continental GT Speed and GTC Speed also feature four-wheel steering, torque vectoring that can shunt power front to back and side to side, an electronic limited slip rear differential for better control of traction at the back, adaptive air suspension, and Bentley’s active anti-roll system, which uses actuators to tug the body upright should it start to lean over in corners.

The powertrain and chassis tech are wrapped in revised styling that isn’t a big departure from the previous Continental models. The most noticeable change is single headlights (the first on a mass-produced Bentley since 1959) with horizontal “eyebrow” elements and Matrix LED tech that allows for a more gradual transition between lit and unlit areas for a more natural feel, according to Bentley.

The interior again incorporates the Bentley Rotating Display, which allows the 12.3-inch infotainment touchscreen (compatible with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto) to be hidden when not in use. A 10-speaker audio system is standard, but customers also have the option of a 16-speaker Band & Olufsen system or 18-speaker Naim system with bass transducers built into the front seats. Those seats also have 20-way power adjustment, automatic climate control, and a posture-adjustment feature.

Production of both the Continental GT Speed and Continental GTC begins later this year at Bentley’s factory in Crewe, England, with deliveries following shortly after. Bentley isn’t discussing pricing, but expect it to be well into the six-figure range. Non-Speed versions of both the GT and GTC should arrive at a later date as well.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
2020 Karma Revero GTS adds performance to go with its sleek looks
2020 karma revero gts plug in hybrid 2019 los angeles auto show

Previous

Next

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more