Skip to main content

Bentley Continental GT3 concept: Bentley takes its land yacht racing

Bentley Continental GT3 conceptBentley won a string of Le Mans victories in the 1920s, and since then it’s been trying to convince people that its gilded luxury cars are actually sports cars. It raced and won at Le Mans in 2003, and now Bentley is back with the Continental GT3 concept, which was shown at this week’s Paris Motor Show and previews a new Bentley racer that will take to the track next year.

One look at the stock Continental GT reveals the enormity of Bentley’s task. This four-seat coupe, which weighs over 5,000 pounds in stock trim, will have to compete against Porsche 911s, Ferrari 458 Italias, and Chevrolet Corvettes, among others.

Recommended Videos

Under such circumstances, how can Bentley’s racing Continental look anything other than ridiculous? What can its engineers do to make the car something other than Boss Tweed in a track suit?

Bentley did not build the Continental GT3 concept for any specific race series, it only said that it was “tailored for race specification.” The GT3 does ditch the stock Continental’s all-wheel drive in favor of rear-wheel drive, and its bodywork definitely looks racecar-esque.

The GT3 concept has the massive rear spoiler, air intakes, and flared wheel arches of a racecar, which are pretty shocking to see on a Bentley. It may not turn out to be a successful racer, but this car will certainly give everyone who sees it a reason to smile.

In theory, those modifications should provide a balance of downforce to keep the GT3 planted, and aerodynamic efficiency to allow it to slice through the air with minimal effort. However, a racer needs more than sleek bodywork.

Bentley did not divulge any mechanical details, but it is likely that a production GT3 would borrow the 6.0-liter, twin-turbocharged W-12 from the Continental GT Speed, the fastest production Bentley. It produces 616 hp and 590 lb-ft of torque in stock form.Bentley Continental GT3 concept overhead view

That seems like plenty of power, but Bentley will have to seriously lighten the Continental’s chassis to improve acceleration and handling.

Bentley says the Continental GT3 has already been approved by the FIA for competition, and its first venues will probably be 24-hour endurance races like the one held every year at the Nürburgring. Further modifications might be needed for individual events of series.

Bentley’s return to racing is the culmination of a years-long effort to revive the brand’s performance image. The 2003 Le Mans win was orchestrated by corporate sibling Audi and coincided with the launched of the first Continental GT. Since then, Bentley has been experimenting with high performance models, including the Supersports and Speed, and even set a world ice racing speed record.

A Bentley will never be quite as good as a purpose-built performance car like a 911, but it’s cool to see the company trying to break a stereotype. It’s cars may be luxurious, but that doesn’t mean they need to be boring.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more