Skip to main content

BMW, GoPro let you record your on-road antics

If you’re anything like me, you’ve spent countless hours hunched over a GoPro suction cupped to the front of your car, trying to capture the perfect angle of a road race or scenic drive. But now, thanks to a new partnership between BMW and GoPro, recording your on-road antics and adventures just got a whole lot easier.

Starting in July, owners of all BMW and MINI models – built in 2012 or later – fitted with the BMW Apps or MINI Connected option, respectively, will be able control his or her GoPro camera from the comfort of the driver seat through the iDrive infotainment unit.

Recommended Videos

How does it work? Rather simply. The driver plugs an iPhone 4 (or later) running the GoPro App into the BMW or MINI’s USB port. Selecting the ConnectedDrive menu on iDrive will allow the driver to access and control a Wi-Fi-equipped GoPro camera (HERO3+ or later).

In the GoPro App in the ConnectedDrive system, drivers will be able to select from one of six preset camera modes: Leisure Drive Facing Out, Night Driving, Sport Driving, Sport Driving Facing Out, Drive Camera Facing In, Winding Road Time-lapse, and Straight Road Time-lapse.

Just as with the standard GoPro App function, the driver can start and stop recording with the camera at any time. Rather than digging through the iPhone, though, users will be able to easily access it all through iDrive.

In addition displaying to video from the GoPro, the in-dash 10.2-inch screen displays the camera’s vital stats including elapsed recording time, battery life, and Wi-Fi signal strength.

While not quite as comprehensive as the Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Performance Data Recorder option, in terms of telemetry overlays on the video capture, this clever new addition is far more accessible. Rather than being forced to choose the option at the dealer, current and future owners can simply go and purchase a GoPro if they wish to opt into the new feature.

Just remember, as brilliant and thoughtful as this may be, don’t record yourself breaking any road laws and upload it to the web. Even if you’re a brilliant driver or the next Martin Scorsese, law enforcement agencies will still ticket you.

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more