Skip to main content

Check out this life-size Bugatti Chiron made from over 1 million Lego pieces

The folks at Lego seem to have a passion for supercars. Lego unveiled a life-size McLaren 720S made from 280,000 bricks at the 2017 Goodwood Festival of Speed. Now Lego is following that up with a Bugatti Chiron model that is not only life size, but also drivable. It makes its public debut at the Formula One Italian Grand Prix in Monza August 30.

Recommended Videos

The Bugatti is made from over 1 million Lego Technic pieces, and took over 13,000 work hours to build, according to Lego. It’s powered by electric motors from the Lego Power Function toy line. Those motors aren’t meant to power something this big, so don’t expect the kick of a real Chiron’s 8.0-liter quad-turbocharged W16 engine. Even with 2,304 motors connected by 4,032 gear wheels, the Lego Chiron only has 5.3 horsepower and 67.8 pound-feet of torque, compared to 1,500 hp and 1,180 lb-ft in the real thing.

While Lego’s non-drivable McLaren 720S was substantially heavier than the real car, the 1.6-ton Lego Chiron may actually be a bit lighter than the genuine article. Nonetheless, we don’t expect the Lego car to be able to match Bugatti’s performance claims for the real Chiron. The automaker has promised 0 to 60 mph in under three seconds, and a top speed high enough to secure the title of world’s fastest production car.

It may not be able to move fast (top speed is 12.4 mph), but it can be driven like a real car. It has a complete interior — including seats and a steering wheel — made entirely of Lego. The outer skin is made of triangular elements interlinked to mimic a smooth surface, at least when viewed from a distance. The car also sports working lights, a rear spoiler, and a speedometer.

To prove that its Chiron replica is no mere static display, Lego took it to Volkswagen’s Ehra Lessien test track in Germany, where the real Chiron was developed. At the wheel was 24 Hours of Le Mans-winning racing driver and Bugatti brand ambassador Andy Wallace.

“Driving the Lego Chiron was a great experience, which I thoroughly enjoyed,” Wallace said in a statement. “All those years ago I could never have imagined that one day I would actually drive a Lego car!”

Don’t expect Lego to start selling life-size Chiron kits anytime soon, but the company does offer a 1/8-scale version that retails for $350. Bugatti just unveiled a sharper, reengineered version of the Chiron called the Divo; we expect it won’t be long before that car is remade in Lego, too.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Scout Traveler SUV vs. Rivian R1S: modern electric SUVs compared
Scout Motors Traveler SUV in a forest

Scout Motors has made a big comeback, now under the guidance of Volkswagen Group. Not only is the Scout brand being reinvigorated but it has already announced two new models in the form of the Scout Terra truck and the Scout Traveler SUV. The Scout Traveler SUV in particular is an interesting vehicle, but it has an uphill battle ahead of it thanks to competition from the likes of Rivian.

The Rivian R1S is often considered to be the best electric SUV out there right now, and while it's not cheap, it offers an excellent set of tech features, a long range, and more. So how does the Scout Traveler SUV compare with the R1S? We put the two vehicles head to head to find out.
Design
The exterior designs of the Scout Traveler and the Rivian R1S are similar in many ways, though there are some major differences. Both vehicles offer a relatively blocky shape characteristic of a traditional SUV. The Traveler is a little more traditional than the Rivian in that it has a spare tire on the back, which is both practical and gives it a rugged vibe.

Read more