Skip to main content

Thanks to telemetry, Bugatti can spot problems with its cars before customers do

Bugatti

If you’re one of the lucky few who own a 1,500-horsepower, $3 million Bugatti Chiron supercar, you should expect periodic calls from the automaker about tire pressure. Bugatti remotely monitors all Chirons from its factory in Molsheim, France. The automaker claims this has allowed it to, among other things, detect an under-inflated tire in an owner’s car thousands of miles away.

Nothing about the Chiron is normal, so it’s not really surprising that Bugatti doesn’t handle maintenance like other automakers either. Tire-pressure sleuthing is made possible by a built-in telemetry system. Similar to technology used in race cars, the system transmits all kinds of data between cars and the factory in real time.

Recommended Videos

Bugatti is able to monitor a car 24 hours a day, seven days a week, as long as the car is in an area with cell coverage. The automaker used this data-monitoring tech in its last supercar, the Veyron, but claims the system used in the Chiron can track even more data. The system monitors 10,000 signals from different parts of the car, such as the engine, transmission, lights, climate control, and infotainment system. Bugatti even used telemetry to monitor prototype Chirons being tested on different continents during the car’s development process.

If a problem is detected, Bugatti can dispatch one of its so-called “Flying Doctors” to wherever the car happens to be located. Unlike their medical counterparts, these doctors still make house calls. Bugatti only has three Flying Doctors, but they can have a car sent back to the factory or to one of 34 global Bugatti dealers if needed.

The telemetry system is a two-way connection, allowing Bugatti to change certain vehicle settings and push software updates remotely in some cases. The system also allows for real-time stolen vehicle tracking, according to Bugatti, which wasn’t available on the Veyron. Granted, that feature has been available on less-exotic cars for some time.

Customers have to give their consent for the telemetry system to be activated when they purchase their cars, and Bugatti says that the majority of customers have agreed to allow data monitoring. The automaker claims to have strict security protocols, including allowing only a handful of employees to access the data. Other automakers will have to address issues of security and transparency as we approach the much-discussed future of connected cars, but Bugatti is already there.

“Bugatti’s telemetry system is our version of the connected car — exclusive and individual for our customers and saving time and money for our developers,” said Norbert Uffmann, who led the system’s development. “This is “Connected Car” à la Bugatti, and it has already been available for more than a decade.”

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more