Skip to main content

Cadillac ATS Coupe vs. BMW 435i: Art & Science vs. the Ultimate Driving Machine

Once you reach a certain age or income bracket, you might be looking for a car that’s got a little performance, some nice but tasteful looks, a bit of badge recognition, and at least a nod to practicality. What that all adds up to in the modern car market is a sports coupe. Two of the best sports coupes on the market right now are the BMW 435i and the Cadillac ATS Coupe.

But which one to get? Well, allow Digital Trends to break it down for you. And because we are ballin’, as the kids say, we aren’t going to be messing around with anything but the top end of the range. So let’s get this duel started.

Performance

Recommended Videos

If you are going to make a sports coupe, you have to have an engine and chassis that can live up to the ‘sports’ part. After all, you really need some way to justify the fact that your car only has two doors.

Fortunately, when you are talking about BMW, performance is rarely an issue. The 435i is no exception, this car packs a 3.0-liter twin-turbo inline six-cylinder that churns out 302 precise German horsepower. That kind of power in a light two-door package is good for 0 to 60 in about 4.6 seconds. That’s thanks in part to the lightning quick eight-speed automatic. But even with impressive figures like that, this car is really set apart by the way it handles. It’s everything you would expect in a Bimmer: refined, precise, and aggressive.

Coming up with a good analogy for a BMW is always hard because it is such an odd mixture of technical brilliance, exhilaration, and heart pounding fear. After thinking about it for a while, I decided that the best way to describe the 435i is like a dental drill that is powered with napalm. The only downside is that if you get the xDrive all-wheel drive system, you lose a lot of the dynamism and fun of the drivetrain.

The Cadillac ATS Coupe though, is stunning. This car is maybe the best example of how much Cadillac has changed in the last fifteen years. Driving this car gives you the complete sports car experience, and that starts with the engine and transmission. The top-end ATS is powered by a 3.6-liter V6 that makes 321 horsepower and 275 pound feet of torque. Because it is naturally aspirated this engine can slam you back in your seat at any speed or rpm. Cadillac hasn’t released the 0 to 60 time of the ATS Coupe with the V6, but it should be comparable to the BMW 435i.

The car handles, well, like a BMW. In step with the BMW, you can get the ATS with all-wheel drive, but even with this option the ATS is taught, light on its feet, and feels constantly ready for more. And while its automatic transmission might have two fewer speeds than the BMW, it is even more responsive.

You might remember all those ridiculous commercials Cadillac put out with the ATS sedan conquering various difficult roads around the world. Well let me tell you; the smiles on the drivers faces were not acted. The ATS is that fun.

If I am honest, in its rear-wheel drive format, it is not quite as refined or lithe as the BMW, despite being a bit lighter and more powerful. But the fact that it is even this close has to be considered an impressive achievement for Caddy. Still, this category goes to the BMW by a nose.

Styling

Styling will always be a subjective evaluation, I might find a particular car beautiful and you might simply be wrong about it. But, nonetheless, design plays a huge role in how we see cars and how well they sell. Both the 435i and the ATS Coupe are doing their best not only to look good in their own right, but also to stand out in a crowded field.

The 435i does this in a classically understated BMW way. Its layout and stance are more aggressive than the car’s 3 Series counterparts, however the car still hews closely to the BMW look. I love the front fascia and lights. BMW has really nailed the use of light surrounds.

The broad stance and tapered rear end hint at this car’s gymnast-like agility. But this impression is let down by a humdrum silhouette. The fact that the 435 is based on a four-seater is obvious, and the consequence are looks that don’t tell you much about how special this car is.

Ultimately BMW has a lot to lose with a love-or-hate design language. The consequences of that are a car that looks good, but a bit generic.

The ATS on the other hand is an example of Cadillac’s more forward-thinking design language. In an effort to overcome a stodgy and deeply uncool image, the company has pushed design much further than most of its competitors. 

The ATS might make heavy use of Cadillac’s ‘Art and Science’ – otherwise known as: ‘rulers only’ – design language, but its lines still evoke the swooping lines of a classic sports car. And while BMW may have a very good thing going with its headlight setup, Cadillac’s new look is one of the best out there. It manages to be modern, while still suggesting the fins of Cadillac’s past.

Pictures really do not do the ATS justice, seeing one of these in person will make your realize that this is not just a good looking car, but also one that is very different from anything else on the market.

Cadillac gets the win here.

Price

Ordinarily I would save this section for the practicality of the cars, things like the interior space, how good the tech is and so on. But in reality that it’s not these things that set the two cars apart. These are luxury cars from luxury automakers. If it’s an option that appears on modern cars, you can get it on these two. What is different is how much it costs, and how you pay for it.

The starting price for a BMW 435i is $46,000, which sounds like a lot, but not an outrageous amount for what you are getting. The problem is that you aren’t going to spend anywhere close to that. Essentially every piece of equipment is an option, and none of them is cheap. With BMW’s online configuration tool,  a rear-wheel drive 435i can reach as high as $62,000. And I wasn’t even splurging on things like 19-inch wheels. I was adding options like a rear-view camera ($900) and leather seats, which you would think should be standard on a German luxury car, but actually cost $1,450.

Cadillac hasn’t released prices for the ATS Coupe yet, it goes on sale shortly, but we can get a good idea of how different matters are by looking at the ATS sedan. There is some gouging. For instance, a sunroof is a $1,050 option. But still, you can expect to spend up to $10,000 less on a similarly equipped ATS Coupe.  

It’s not just that it is a lot of money, which it is, but also how you feel spending it. It sucks to have to spend $5,000 on the sort of optional equipment that comes standard on a $26,000 Mazda3, especially when BMW doesn’t even take you out for ice cream after they are done rummaging around in your pockets.

Ultimately BMW does this sort of thing because, as one of the world’s best selling luxury brands, they can. But when you can get a car for less money that might actually be better, why wouldn’t you?

The edge goes to Cadillac ATS Coupe

Conclusion

During the Second World War, BMW made aircraft engines, including those on the world’s first jet fighter. Cadillac made tanks. Where BMW went on to make sports cars, Cadillac kept making tanks, they just put fins on them. For a long time that was all you needed to know about why you should get a Bimmer instead of a Caddy.

But the ATS is a sign of how much things have changed. It may still be a little ways away from being an ultimate driving machine, but it might actually be more fun than its German rival. 

I couldn’t fault anyone for choosing the BMW; it is a great car that you would never regret owning. But with the ATS Coupe being so much cheaper, you might regret buying the 4 Series. And that for me is enough of a reason to say that if you want a sports coupe, it should be the one from Detroit, not Munich.

Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more
Costco partners with Electric Era to bring back EV charging in the U.S.
costco ev charging us electricera fast station 1260x945

Costco, known for its discount gas stations, has left EV drivers in need of juicing up out in the cold for the past 12 years. But that seems about to change now that the big-box retailer is putting its brand name on a DC fast-charging station in Ridgefield, Washington.
After being one of the early pioneers of EV charging in the 1990s, Costco abandoned the offering in 2012 in the U.S.
While opening just one station may seem like a timid move, the speed at which the station was installed -- just seven weeks -- could indicate big plans going forward.
Besides lightening-speed installation, Electric Era, the Seattle-based company making and installing the charging station, promises to offer “hyper-reliable, battery-backed fast charging technology in grid-constrained locations.”
Its stalls can deliver up to 200 kilowatts and come with built-in battery storage, allowing for lower electricity rates and the ability to remain operational even when power grids go down.
If that sounds like it could very well rival Tesla’s SuperCharger network, it’s no coincidence: Quincy Lee, its CEO, is a former SpaceX engineer.
Costco also seems confident enough in the company to have put its brand name on the EV-charging station. Last year, the wholesaler did open a pilot station in Denver, this time partnering with Electrify America, the largest charging network in the U.S. However, Costco did not put its brand name on it.
In an interview with Green Car Reports, Electric Era said it was still in talks with Costco about the opening of new locations. Last year, Costco said it was planning to install fast chargers at 20 locations, without providing further details. It has maintained EV-charging operations in Canada, the UK, Spain, and South Korea.
Meanwhile, the wholesaler’s U.S. EV-charging plans might very well resemble those of rival Walmart, which last year announced it was building its own EV fast-charging network in addition to the arrangements it already had with Electrify America.

Read more
The UK’s Wayve brings its AI automated driving software to U.S. shores
wayve ai automated driving us driver assist2 1920x1152 1

It might seem that the autonomous driving trend is moving at full speed and on its own accord, especially if you live in California.Wayve, a UK startup that has received over $1 billion in funding, is now joining the crowded party by launching on-road testing of its AI learning system on the streets of San Francisco and the Bay Area.The announcement comes just weeks after Tesla unveiled its Robotaxi at the Warner Bros Studios in Burbank, California. It was also in San Francisco that an accident last year forced General Motors’ robotaxi service Cruise to stop its operations. And it’s mostly in California that Waymo, the only functioning robotaxi service in the U.S., first deployed its fleet of self-driving cars. As part of its move, Wayve opened a new office in Silicon Valley to support its U.S. expansion and AI development. Similarly to Tesla’s Full-Self Driving (FSD) software, the company says it’s using AI to provide automakers with a full range of driver assistance and automation features.“We are now testing our AI software in real-world environments across two continents,” said Alex Kendall, Wayve co-founder and CEO.The company has already conducted tests on UK roads since 2018. It received a huge boost earlier this year when it raised over $1 billion in a move led by Softbank and joined by Microsoft and Nvidia. In August, Uber also said it would invest to help the development of Wayve’s technology.Just like Tesla’s FSD, Wayve’s software provides an advanced driver assistance system that still requires driver supervision.Before driverless vehicles can legally hit the road, they must first pass strict safety tests.So far, Waymo’s technology, which relies on pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), is the only of its kind to have received the nod from U.S. regulators.

Read more